مقایسه مهارت های خودتنظیمی در دانش‌آموزان دوره متوسطه اول هوشمند و سنتی

الموضوعات :

ربابه فلاح کفشگری ¹ , شعبان حیدری ²

1 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی عمومی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران
2 - عضو هیأت علمی گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد ساری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساری، ایران

تاريخ الإرسال : 07 الخميس , جمادى الأولى, 1436 تاريخ التأكيد : 08 الخميس , جمادى الثانية, 1437 تاريخ الإصدار : 22 الإثنين , ربيع الثاني, 1437

الکلمات المفتاحية: مدارس هوشمند, باورهای انگیزشی, مهارت‌های خودتنظیمی, راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم, دوره متوسطه اول,

ملخص المقالة :

پ‍‍ژوهش حاضر، با هدف مقایسه مهارت‌های خودتنظیمی دانش‌آموزان مدارس دوره متوسطه اول هوشمند و سنتی استان مازندران در سال 1393 انجام گرفته است. روش پژوهش، توصیفی از نوع علی- مقایسه‌ای است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، کلیه دانش‌آموزان دوره متوسطه اول هوشمند و عادی استان مازندران بود. از میان آنها، به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تعداد 400 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند (200 نفر از دانش‌آموزان مدارس هوشمند و 200 نفر از دانش‌آموزان مدارس سنتی). برای گردآوری داده‌ها، پرسش‌نامه مهارت‌های خودتنظیمی پنتریچ و دی گروت (1990) با پایایی 0/92استفاده شده است. روش‌های آماری مورد استفاده، شامل آمار توصیفی (میانگین و انحراف معیار) و آمار استنباطی (t گروه‌های مستقل و تحلیل واریانس چندمتغیری) بوده است. یافته‌ها نشان داد که مهارت‌های خودتنظیمی در دانش‌آموزان دوره متوسطه اول هوشمند و سنتی دارای تفاوت معناداری است. هم‌چنین، باورهای انگیزشی و راهبردهای یادگیری خودتنظیم دانش‌آموزان در مدارس هوشمند بیشتر از دانش‌آموزان مدارس غیرهوشمند است. به‌نظر می‌رسد، به‌کارگیری فن‌آوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات، از طریق برنامه هوشمندسازی مدارس در استان مازندران به‌ خوبی توانسته است مهارت‌های خودتنظیم دانش‌آموزان را ارتقاء دهد.

المصادر:

1. Ajam, A. A., Jafari Sani, H., Mahram, B., & Ahanchian, M. R. (2012). The self-regulated learning strategies, computer skills and academic achievement in their views about synchronous and asynchronous interaction blended learning approach. Research on Curriculum, 2(34), 1-17. (in Persian).


2. Amirteimoori, M. H., Zolfaghari, M., & Saidpor, M. (2010). Compare self- regulation skills, critical thinking and creative thinking of students with a combination of education and traditional education (person) School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences in the academic year 2009-10. (in Persian).


3. Arsal, Z. (2010). The effects of diaries on self- regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 85-103.


4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Precentic Hall.


5. Bembenutty, H. (2008). Self-regulation of learning and academic delay of grafication: Gender and ethnic difference among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 4, 586-616.


6. Berry, C. A. (1992). Pervious learning experiences strategy beliefs and task definition in self-regulated foreign language learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 318-336.


7. Corno, L., & Rohrkemper, M. (1985). The intrinsic motivation to learn in classrooms. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation: The classroom milieu, 2, 53-90. New York: Academic Press.


8. Daizadeh, H., Hosainzadeh, B., & Ghaznavi, M. R. (2010). The role of ICT on the academic performance of high school students. Leadership and Educational Administration, 4(4), 97-81. (in Persian).


9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self- determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182-185.


10. Deleuze, Z. (2001). Training for the twenty- first century (Translation by S.F. Eftekharzadeh). Tehran: Abed.


11. Dembo. M. H. (1994). Applying educational psychology (5th ed), New York: London.


12. Ghasemi, A. A. (2009). Role of ICT in teaching mathematics with a focus on software GUEP2. Master Thesis, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University. (in Persian).


13. Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2001). Promoting collaborative inquiry in technology enriched mathematics classrooms. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle. 10­14.


14. Jalali, A. A. (2009). Smart school key to new technologies. Retrieved from http://www.drjalali.ir/download/ (in Persian).


15. Jokar, M. S. (2010). Guidelines for the implementation of new educational technologies in middle and high schools (the case of smart schools in the country. M.A. Thesis, Allameh Tabatabai University. (in Persian).


16. Kajbaf, M. B., Molavi, H., & Shirazi Tehrani, A. R. (2003). The relationship between self- regulated learning strategies and motivational beliefs and academic performance in high school. Journal of Cognitive Science news, 1, 27-33. (in Persian).


17. Khani, M., Bagheri, S., & Daneshyar, L. (2013). The relationship is self-learning strategies with a score of high school physics students. Scientific Association of Physics Teachers education Iran, from 12 to 15 September 2013, university educators. (in Persian).


18. Khazai, K., & Ashournezhad, K. (2012). Relationship skills, self-direction of ICT components in student learning. Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Education, 1(3), 45-61. (in Persian).


19. Kozma, R. (2003). Connection with the twenty first century: Technology in support of education reform. In C Dede (ed.), Technology and Learning. Washington, DC: American Society for Curriculum Development.


20. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurements, 30, 607-610.


21. Lee, J. K. (2008). The effects of self-regulated learning strategies and system satisfaction regarding learner’s performance. Information and Management, 40, 133-146.


22. Mahmoodi, J., Nalchigar, S., Ebrahimi, B., & Sadeghi Moghadam, M. R. (2008). The challenges of the development of smart schools in the country. Journal of Educational Innovations, 27(7), 61-78. (in Persian).


23. Ministry of Education. (2007). Smart school development strategy, the Ministry of Education in the development of information and communication technology. Center for Statistics and Information Technology and Communication. (in Persian).


24. Motei, H., Haidari, M., & Sadeghi, M. S. (2012). Factors predicting academic procrastination based on self- regulation in the first grade high school students in Tehran. Educational Psychology, 24, 49-70. (in Persian).


25. Naseri, M., & Mashhadian, F. (2011). Iranian intelligence and the quality of schools. School of Tomorrow, 7, 29. (in Persian).


26. Niemi, H., & Launonen, A. (2010). Towards self ­regulation and social navigatio in virtual learning spaces. European Conference on Educational Research, University of Lisbon. 11­-14 Sep, 2010.


27. Pakdaman Savoji, A. (2007). Compare regulated learning strategies in e-learning and training in person. Journal of Educational Management, 2, 37-64. (in Persian).


28. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self- regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385- 407.


29. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.


30. Rastgarpoor, H., Saligheh, F., Alvandi Sarabi, M., Kavosian, J. (2009). The point of view of teachers in Tehran on the use of computers in education and its relationship with computer anxiety. Educational Research, 20, 135-158. (in Persian).


31. Samadi, M. (2004). Check self- learning students and parents and the role of gender and academic performance. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 1(34), 14-27. (in Persian).


32. Schunk, D. H. (1998). Goal and self- evaluative influences during childrens cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.


33. Shirdel, K., Mirzaian, B., & Hassanzadeh, R. (2012). Self- regulated learning strategies and motivation and academic performance of high school students a Sari area. Quarterly New Ideas in Education, 4(7), 1-24. (in Persian).


34. Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Selfregulation a web based course: A case study, ETR&D, 52(4), 5­22.


35. Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology and Society, 10(2), 71-83.


36. Zamani, B. I., Abedi, A., Soleimani, N., & Amini, N. (2010). Stages of secondary school teachers in the city's interest in information and communication technology acceptance model is based on hull and drive interest. Study of Teaching and Learning, 2, 107-132. (in Persian).


37. Zamani, B. I., Saidi, Z., & Abedi, A. (2011). Effectiveness and sustainability of the impact of multimedia on self- regulation and academic performance in high school mathematics. New Approaches to Teaching, 14, 1-22. (in Persian).


38. Zameni, F., & Kardan, S. (2010). The impact of information and communication technology in learning mathematics. Information and Communication in Educational Sciences, 1(1), 23-38. (in Persian).


39. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Constrat validation of a strategy model of student self- regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80.


40. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628.


41. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 51-59.


42. Zofen, A. (2013). Application of new technologies in education: The study and compilation of humanities universities (side). Humanities Research and Development Center. (in Persian).