Designing Criteria for Evaluating the English Language Quality of Iranian EFL Learners: Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes in Focus

Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation

Fatemeh  Gorji ¹ (Department of English Language, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran)
Shahram  Afraz ² (Department of English Language, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran)
Fazlolah  Samimi ³ (Department of English, Bandar Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran)

Received: 2022-10-26 Accepted : 2022-12-27 Published : 2023-01-01

Keywords: Designing, Iranian EFL learners, Evaluating, English Language quality, Teacher Attitudes,

Abstract :

This study designed and validated criteria to evaluate the English language quality of Iranian EFL learners to provide information about the foreign language learning and teaching systems and to improve the quality standards in Iran. the method of this research is descriptive exploratory type. The statistical population of this research includes 20 experienced teachers working at different levels (primary, intermediate & advanced) in a non-profit language institute (Safir Language Institute) in Bandar Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran. Sampling was performed theoretically using chain sampling or snowball sampling. In this study, the process of analyzing the data obtained from the interviews was performed in three coding steps (open, axial, and selective) which were performed consecutively, the interviews were collected and analyzed and coded line by line using version 10 of qualitative data analysis software (MAXQDA). Results showed that the most important Criteria for Evaluating the English Language Quality of Iranian EFL Learners are learning strategy, individual characteristics, learning dynamics, educational technology, content setting, anxiety and low self-esteem, weaknesses in learning, positive evaluation, negative evaluation, assess knowledge and skills, individual consequences, social consequences, cultural implications, economic consequences, and political consequences.

References:

Azir, I. D. A. (2019). Applying Peer Scaffolding to Enhance the EFL Vocational Students’ Speaking Skills. Ethical Lingua. Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 6(2), 149-157.

Blake, R. J. (2008). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Danayi fard, H., Alvani, M., Azar, A. (2013). Qualitative Research Methodology in Management: Total Approach. Tehran: Saffar.

Farhangi, A. A., Karroubi, M., Sadegh Vaziri, F. (2015), Classical Foundation Data Theory; Describing the Processes of Generating Theory of Gravity Center of Brand Identity of Iran Health Tourism, Business Management, 7 (1),162-145. 

Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.

Fulcher, G. (2012). Scoring Performance Tests. In G. Fulcher & F. Davidson (Eds.), The Routledg handbook of language testing. London/New York: Routledge.

Fulcher, G. (2015a). Assessing second language speaking. Language Teaching, 48(2), 198–216.

Fulcher, G. (2015b). Re-examining Language Testing: A Philosophical and Social Inquiry. London/New York: Routledge.

Fulcher, G., & Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2013). Limited aspects of reality: Frames of reference in language assessment. International Journal of English Studies, 13(2), 1–19.

Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 18, 519–521.

Green, B. A. (2014). Program evaluation and language assessment. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.). The companion to language assessment: Abilities, contexts and learners, 3(2), 443-456.

Herppich, S., Praetorius, A.-K., Förster, N., Glogger-Frey, I., Karst, K., Leutner, D., … Klug, J. (2018). Teachers' assessment competence: Integrating knowledge-, process-, and product-oriented approaches into a competence-oriented conceptual model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 181–193.

Hoy, C., Bayne-Jardine, C., & Wood, M. (2000). Improving Quality in Education. (1st ed.). London: Falmer Press.

Kaulfers, W. V. (1944). War-time developments in modern language achievement tests. Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372.

Mills, N., Pajares, F. & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57(3), 417-442.

Nasr, M., Bagheri, M. S., Sadighi, F., &Rassaei, E. (2018). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of assessment for learning regarding monitoring and scaffolding practices as a function of their demographics. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1558916.

Nomnian, S. (2002). Constructivism: Theory and its application to language teaching. Studies in Language and Language Teaching, 11, 62-71.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: Language Learning Strategies by Persian EFL Learners. What every teacher should know. New bury House.

Rezaee, A. A., Khomeijani Farahani, A. A., & Abdulameer Mubarak, L. (2018). Scaffolding and EFL Learners' Use of Language Learning Strategies in the Iraqi Language Teaching Context. Teaching the English Language, 12(2), 89-116.

Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Abdelshaheed, B. (2019). Using Instructional Scaffolding Strategies to Support Oral Productive Language Skills among English Majors at Majmaah University. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 10(4), 99-121.

Thorndike, E. L. (1912). The measurement of educational products. The School Review, 20(5), 289–299.

Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121-142.

Yang, S. C., & Chen, Y. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: a case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 860-879.

Yerkes, R. M. (1921). Psychological Examining in the United States Army (Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. XV). Washington, DC: GPO