Self-assessing Metacognitive Listening Strategies: Do They Have any Effect on Listening Comprehension of L2 Learners?
Subject Areas : Research in English Language PedagogyHiwa Weisi 1 , Reza Mirderikvand 2 , Ahmad Goodarzi 3
1 - English Language Department, Faculty of Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
2 - English Language Department, Razi University, Kermashan, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Faculty of Humanities, Ayatollah Ozma Borujerdi University, Borujerd, Iran
Keywords: Languaging, Listening Comprehension, Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire, Metacognitive Listening Strategies, Written Languaging,
Abstract :
Listening comprehension, despite having been attended recently, has been construed as the Cinderella of language teaching for long. Recently, the attention has shifted to the metacognitive processes involved in listening comprehension. Hence, some researchers offer using a written self-assessment checklist for assessing and fostering metacognitive awareness of listening strategies; however, dearth of research in this area has deterred practitioners from making thorough conclusions. Thus, the present study was an attempt to probe into the effect of self-assessing metacognitive listening strategies (MLSs) on listening comprehension of Iranian English as a second/foreign (L2) learners. To this aim, using convenient sampling method, 40 Iranian intermediate EFL learners piloted and assigned into two groups: the experimental group (n=20) and the conventional one (n=20). The former used the written self-assessment checklist to generate written languaging during different phases of teaching listening while the latter was not involved in producing written languaging. Both groups took the listening section of the IELTS and Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ) before and after the study. After 14 sessions of treatment, both groups took the listening post-test and MALQ. Results indicated that listening accompanied with written languaging significantly improved awareness of MLSs and gains in listening comprehension. The outperformance of the experimental group over the conventional one was in line with the findings of previous studies on written languaging and process-based approaches to listening. The findings offer some pedagogical implications for L2 teachers and teacher trainers to take advantage of some tools such as a self-assessment checklist to get students to produce written languaging and hence deepen their understanding of MLSs and listening skill. After 14 sessions of treatment, both groups took the listening post-test and MALQ. Results indicated that listening accompanied with written languaging significantly improved awareness of MLSs and gains in listening comprehension. The outperformance of the experimental group over the conventional one was in line with the findings of previous studies on written languaging and process-based approaches to listening. The findings offer some pedagogical implications for L2 teachers and teacher trainers to take advantage of some tools such as a self-assessment checklist to get students to produce written languaging and hence deepen their understanding of MLSs and listening skill.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (1990). Introduction to Research in Education. Holt, Rinchart and Winston.
Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.
Chou, M. H. (2023). Strategies for interactive listening in modern foreign language learning. Language Awareness, 32(1), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2047194
Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809103446
Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65(4), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq073
Cross, J. (2015). Metacognition in L2 listening: Clarifying instructional theory and Practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 883-892. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.258
Ebrahimi, M., Izadpanah, S., & Namaziandost, E. (2021). The Impact of Writing Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment on Iranian L2 Learners’ Autonomy and Metacognitive Awareness. Education Research International, 20(21), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9307474
Fahim, M., & Fakhri Alamdari, E. (2014). Exploring the effect of the model of metacognitive instruction on the listening performance of L2 learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3(3), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2014.700
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive development enquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-11. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge university press.
Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT Journal, 51(4), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.4.361
Goh, C. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30(2), 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00004-0
Goh, C. (2010). Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self-regulation. In N. Harwood, English language teaching materials (pp. 179-206). Cambridge University Press.
Goh, C. C. & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl002
Graham, S. & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate. System 36(3), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x
Ishikawa, M. (2013). Examining the effect of written languaging: The role of metanotes as a mediator of second language learning. Language Awareness, 22(3), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2012.683435
Keshanchi, E., Pourdana, N., & Famil Khalili, G. (2023). Differential Impacts of pair and self-dynamics on written languaging attributes and translation task performance in EFL context. English Teaching & Learning, 47(2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00113-w
Moradian, M. R., Miri, M., & Hossein Nasab, M. (2017). Contribution of written languaging to enhancing the efficiency of written corrective feedback. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 406-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12138
Mahdavi, N., & Miri, M. (2017). Co-Shaping metacognitive awareness and developing listening comprehension through process-based instruction. International Journal of Listening, 22(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1260454
Moradian, M. R., Miri, M., & Hossein Nasab, M. (2017). Contribution of written languaging to enhancing the efficiency of written corrective feedback. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 406-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12138
Moradiani, M. R., Hossein-Nasabi, M., & Miri, M. (2020). Effects of written languaging in response to direct and indirect corrective feedback on developing writing accuracy. Languaging in Language Learning and Teaching: A collection of empirical studies, 55, 267. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55
Nunan, D. (1998). Approaches to teaching listening in language classroom. In proceedings of the 1997 Korea TESOL Conference. KOTESOL.
Öztürk, E. Ö. (2021). An investigation on MLS use and listening anxiety in L2 classrooms. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(2), 737-751. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.876609
Rost, M. (2013). Teaching and researching listening. Longman.
Sun, Q., Pan, H., & Zhan, J. (2023). Untangling the relationship between English as a foreign language learners’ metacognitive experiences and writing proficiency: A mixed-methods approach. System, 117, 103100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103100
Suzuki, W. (2009). Improving Japanese university students’ second language writing accuracy: Effects of language. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 20, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.20581/arele.20.0_81
Suzuki, W. (2012). Written languaging, direct correction and second language writing revision. Language Learning, 24(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00720.x
Suzuki, W., & Itagaki, N. (2009). Languaging in grammar exercises by Japanese L2 learners of differing proficiency. System, 37, 217-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.10.001
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). Continuum.
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer–peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000090
Vandergrift, L. (1997). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 494-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15404781.1997.tb05517.x
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338
Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60(2), 470-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
Vandergrift, L. (2011). Second language listening: Presage, process, product, and pedagogy. In n E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 455-471). Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Wang, W. (2016). Learning to listen: The impact of a metacognitive approach to listening instruction. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0235-4