مسئولیت بین المللی حمایت و حاکمیت دولتها
محورهای موضوعی : روابط بین الملل
دیدخت صادقی صادقی
1
(عضو هیئت علمی دانشکده علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکزی)
کلید واژه: مسئولیت حمایت, حاکمیت, مداخله بشر دوستانه, حقوق بشر, دولتها,
چکیده مقاله :
این مقاله به چگونگی ظهور دکترین مسئولیت بین المللی حمایت در پی توسعه حقوق بشر و کمرنگ شدن حاکمیت دولتها می‌پردازد. مسئولیت حمایت یک مفهوم در حال تحول در مورد وظایف دولتها برای جلوگیری و پایان دادن به اعمال خشونت علیه مردم است و هدف آن ارائه یک مبنای حقوقی و اخلاقی برای مداخله بشر دوستانه است. افزایش جنگهای داخلی در دهه 1990، نقض فاحش حقوق بشر و معضلات ناشی از مداخلات بشر دوستانه، ضرورت ایجاد مسئولیت بین المللی حمایت را آشکار نمود. این دکترین یک تفکر جدید در حاکمیت است که تأکید می‌کند حاکمیت به معنای امتیاز نیست بلکه به معنای مسئولیت است. لذا حاکمیت به معنای کنترل به حاکمیت به معنای مسئولیت تبدیل شده است. بر اساس این ایده جدید، حکمرانان بایستی در مورد رفتار با مردمشان، پاسخگوی جامعه جهانی باشند. مسئولیت حمایت دو اثر مهم در مناسبات بین المللی داشته است. یکی اینکه حاکمیت دولت مطلق نبوده و قابل تغییر و تعدیل است و دیگری آنکه حقوق فردی بطور جدی مورد توجه جامعه جهانی قرار گرفته است.
Abstract This paper attempts to analyze the emergence of the doctrine of "international responsibility to protect" in the climate of human rights extension and decline of the national states sovereignty. The "responsibility to protect" is an evolving concept that shoes the duties of the governments to provide a legal ethical for humanitarian intervention. The increase of internal wars in 1990's the violation of human rights and the dilemma of implication of humanitarian intervention clearly showed the necessity of the foundation of "responsibility to protect". This doctrine is implication of new thinking on sovereignty, which says sovereignty is not "privilege" but is a "Responsibility". So sovereignty as "control" changed to sovereignty as "Responsibility". Upon This new idea governors should to world community about behavior to their peoples. The "Responsibility to protect" has had two important the effect in international relation, first it became clear that the sovereignty of national states is no more also lute and could be declined. Secondly, the individual rights has become seriously under observation of international community.
منابع
- Annan, Kofi (18 September 1999),"Two Concepts of sovereignty", The Economist, No. 325, available at: http://www.idre.ca/en/ev/28492-201-1-do-topic-html.
- Bajoria, Jayshree(12 June 2013), "The Dilemma of Humanitarian Intervention", Council on Foreign Relations, available at: http://www.cfr.org/human - rights/dilemma - humanitarian intervention /P16524.
- Boutros-Ghali, Boutros (17 June 1992),"An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peace- making and peace-Keeping", A/47/277-S/2411.
- Brown, Adele(17 June 2008), "Reinventing Humanitarian Intervention: Two Cheers for the Responsibility to Protect", International Affairs and Defense Section, House of Common library, Research Paper, 08/55.
- Brownlie, Ian (2008), Principles of Public International law, Oxford, Oxford university press.
- Evans, Gareth (29 July 2007), "The Limits of State Sovereignty: The Responsibility to Protect in the 21 Century", International Crises Group, available at:
- Insam, Lorenz (11 October 2011), "The Concept of Responsibility to Protect and how it Changes international law", available at: http://www.youth-time.org.
- Krosner, Stephen D. (Winter 1995-1996), "Compromising Westphalia, International Security", available at:
http://www.iciss.ca/report2-en-asp#sovereignty.
- Magnuson, William (March 2010), "The Responsibility to Protect and The Decline of Sovereignty: Free Speech Protection under International Law", Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 43.
- Mclean, Sheila (1986), The Right to Reproduce in Human Rights: Rhetoric to Reality, American Society of International Law.
- Payandeh, Mehrdad (2010), "With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility? The Concept to Protect With in the Process of International Law Malting", The YALE Journal of International Law, Vol. 35.
- Tharror, Shashi and Daws, Sam (Summer 2001), "Humanitarian Intervention: Getting Past the reefs", World Policy Journal, XVIII, No. 2.
- Ryan, Christopher. M. (1977), "Sovereignty, Intervention and Law: A Tenuous Relation of competing Principles", Journal of International studies.
- Sens, Allen and Stoott Peter(2005), "Global, Politics: Origins, Currents, Perfections", Toronto: Nelson.
- Simons, Ken (Jan-March 2003), "Sovereignty and Responsibility to Protect", Peace magazine org/archive/v.19.nl.
- Documents:
- “Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocied”, G. A. Res 260 (11),9 Dec 1948 U.N Gaor 3rd sess. 179th plen.mty
- G.A/Res/1541(xy),14 December 1960.
- ICJ Reports, 1949
- S.C.Res.1160, 31 March 1998
- S.C.Res.1199, 23 September 1998
- S.C.Res.1203, 24 October 1998
- S.C/Res/1674 (2006), General distribution to the media united nations security council.
- The Secretary-General, "Report of the Secretary-General: The Role of - The United Nations in twenty-First Century”, U. N. Doc. A/54/2000 (Mar.27.2000)
- The Secretary-General, Millennium Report of The Secretary-General of the United Nation, "We the People: The Role of The united nation in the 21st Century”, U.N.Doc. A/54/20(2000) available at: http://www.u.n.org/millennium/sg/report/ch3.pdf
- The Secretary-General, Report of the Secretary-General Implementing the Responsibility to Protect, U.N.Doc. A/63/67 (Jan.12.2009).
- United Nation, General assembly, (2005), "World Summation Outcome Document", 15 September 2005, G.A/Res/60/1.
- Uniting for Peace, G. A. Res. 377(V), U. N. Doc. A/1775(Nov.3.1950).
- -"Press Release, Security Council Rejects Demand for Cessation of Use Force against Federal Republic of Yugoslavia", U.N Doc.sc/6659 (26 March 1999).