An Exploration into Iranian Novice versus Experienced EFL Teachers’ Perceptions toward a New Model of Teacher Supervision

Subject Areas : Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English

Ashraf Montaseri ¹ (Department of English, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Reza Pajoohan Doost ² (Department of English, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran)
Davood Ghahremani ³ (Department of English, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran)

Received: 2023-10-01 Accepted : 2023-12-23 Published : 2023-12-01

Keywords: Four-stage supervision model, Novice and experienced EFL teachers, Teachers’ professional development (TPD), Standard TPD Model,

Abstract :

This study explored novice and experienced EFL teachers’ perceptions toward a four-stage (readiness, informing, improvement, evaluation) supervision model administered for developing teachers’ professionalism considering different components of a standard Teachers’ Professional Development (TPD) model. The participants of the study were 100 novice and 100 experienced male and female EFL teachers with different academic degrees from different regions of Alborz Province. The participants’ classes were observed, and appropriate feedback was given (readiness), then a gathering was held, and all the information regarding the procedure of a TPD teacher training course was declared (informing stage). After that, the participants attended a 45-session TPD course through which all the components and subcomponents of the standard TPD model were taught theoretically and practically (improvement stage). Then, the second series of observations were carried out (evaluation stage). Finally, to elicit deep and careful perceptions from participants regarding the effectiveness of the implemented supervision programs, 30 novice and 30 experienced teachers as representatives of the population were randomly interviewed, and the qualitative reports obtained from semi-structured interviews were analyzed thematically. The results represented that although there were some differences between the shortcomings and needs of the two groups, the professionalism of all the participants in different components of the TPD model was highly developed, the deficiencies were to a large extent removed and they were completely satisfied. This study had some implications for the policy-makers, teacher supervisors, teachers, and school principals.

References:

Amini, S., & Gholami, J. (2018). Professional development of EFL teachers through rotatory peer supervision. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(2), 101-117.

Arong, F. E., & Ogbandu, M. A. (2010). Major causes of declining quality of education in Nigeria administrative perspective: A case study of dekina local government area. Canadian Social Science, 6(3), 61-76.

Azizpour, Sh., & Gholami, J. (2021b). EFL teacher-supervisors’ attitudes toward supervision in Iranian language schools. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(1), 16-34.

Azizpour, Sh., & Gholami, J. (2021c). Exploring EFL teachers’ attitudes toward teacher supervision in Iranian language schools. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 9(2), 105-125.

Azizpour, Sh., & Gholami, J. (2021a). Iranian language school managers’ attitudes towards EFL teacher supervision. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching & Research, 9(35), 53-69.

Baniabdelrahman, A. A. (2004). Roles of cooperating teachers and practicum supervisors and their effect on EFL student-teachers’ teaching skills. Asian EFL Journal, 6(3), Article 8. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/september_04_aab.php

Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, J. K., & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 263-280.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.

Chen, C. W. Y., & Cheng, Y. S. (2013). The supervisory process of EFL teachers: A case study. TESL-EJ, 17(1), 1-21.

Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000).  Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Diacopoulos, M. M., & Butler, B. M. (2020). What do we supervise for? A self-study of learning teacher candidate supervision. Studying Teacher Education, 16(1), 66-83.

Earle, F., Fox, J., Webb, C., & Bowyer, S. (2017). Reflective supervision: Resource pack. Dartington: Research in Practice.

Eryılmaz, A., & Mutlu, T. (2017). Developing the four-stage supervision model for counselor trainees. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17, 597–629.

Esia-Donkoh, K., & Ofosu-Dwamena, E. (2014). Effects of educational supervision on professional development: perception of public basic school teachers at Winneba, Ghana. British Journal of Education, 2(6), 63-82. www.eajournals.org

Estaji, M., & Ghiasvand, F. (2022).  Classroom supervision and professionalism: Matches and mismatches in the perceptions of novice and experienced teachers. Applied Research on English Language, 11(3), 1-36. DOI: 10.22108/ARE.2022.131707.1817

Ghoshooni, A. (1995). The survey in quality of training courses in-services at high schools in Tehran. Unpublished Master's Thesis in Persian, Tarbiyat Moallem University.

Glickman, C., Gordon, S., & Ross-Gordon, J. (2008).  The basic guide to supervision and instructional leadership. Allyn & Bacon.

Hoque, K. E., Kenayathulla, H. B. B., Subramaniam, M. V. D/O., & Islam, R. (2020). Relationships between supervision and teachers' performance and attitude in secondary schools in Malaysia. SAGE OPEN, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020925501

Jaeger, E. L. (2013). Teacher reflection: Supports, barriers, and results. Issues in Teacher Education, 22(1), 89-104.

Janssens, F. J., & Van Amelsvoort, G. H. (2008). School self-evaluations and school inspections in Europe: An exploratory study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(1), 15-23.

Khany, R., & Azimi Amoli, F. (2016). Validating an English language teacher professional development scale in Iranian EFL Context. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 5(1), 107-134.

Khany, R., & Azimi Amoli, F. (2016). Evaluation of English language teacher professional development in an Iranian EFL context: Towards the development of a new inventory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in English, Ilam University.

Mette, I., Aguilar, I., & Wieczorek, D. (2020). A thirty-state analysis of teacher supervision and evaluation systems in the ESSA era. Journal of Educational Supervision, 3(2), 105-135.

Moradi, K., Sepehrifar, S., & Khadiv, T. P. (2014). Exploring Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions on supervision. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1214-1223.

Morrison, T. (2005). Staff supervision in social care. Brighton: Pavilion.

Nolan, J., & Hoover, L. A. (2007). Teacher supervision and evaluation: Theory into practice. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=zRlbAAAACAAJ

Pawlas, G. E., & Oliva, P. F. (2007). Supervision for today's schools. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=5VdyDwAAQBAJ

Rahmany, R., Hasani, M. T., & Parhoodeh, K. (2014). EFL teachers’ attitudes towards being supervised in an EFL context. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 348-359. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.348-359

Sergiovanni, T.  J., & Starratt, R.  J. (2007).  Supervision: A redefinition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Burdett, J. (2003). International comparisons of the relationships among educational effectiveness, evaluation, and improvement variables: An overview. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 5-20.

Zeichner, K. m., & Liston, D. P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 23-48.

Zepeda, S. J., & Ponticell, J. A. (1998). At cross-purposes: What do teachers need, want, and get from supervision? Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(1), 68-87.