Effect of Psychosocial Factors on Iranian Adult EFL Learners’ Intonation
Subject Areas : Applied Linguistics
Akram Alaedini
1
,
Azizeh Chalak
2
1 - Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch
Islamic Azad University
Isfahan, Iran
Keywords: age, gender, لحن, جنسیت, سن, Autonomy, خودمختاری, Intonation, Psychosocial Factors, عوامل روانی اجتماعی,
Abstract :
Intonation conducts a linguistic function and has a crucial role in discourse regulation. It is an essential skill that learners should acquire, mainly because it can impact comprehension and accuracy. Like other speech characteristics, intonation may comprise information about the speaker’s traits. Therefore, this study examined whether intonation is affected by age, gender, and autonomy. Based on the purpose of the research, the paradigm was quantitative, and the design was casual-comparative (ex post facto). Sixty-two intermediate EFL learners were conveniently selected from the private language institutes in Isfahan, Iran. Data were collected by the Learning Autonomy Scale and a teacher-made oral test. An ANOVA was used to measure the effect of gender, age, and autonomy and their interaction on intonation. The data analysis revealed that intonation scores were higher in the older age group and girls. Boys in the younger age group exhibited smaller mean values for intonation. In addition, those who were more autonomous scored higher in intonation. Therefore, it can be concluded that age, gender, and autonomy affect intonation. The findings of this study could be used in compiling English language course programs and determining speech therapy goals.
Azieb, S. (2021). The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: A review of the literature. International Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Studies, 8(4), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.22259/2694-6296.0804001
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(4) 447-465.
Bui, N. (2018). Learner autonomy in tertiary English classes in Vietnam. In J. Albright (Ed.), English tertiary education in Vietnam (pp. 158–171). Routledge. https://doi.o rg/10.432 4/978131 521209 8-12
Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1349–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsych ologia.2007.12.021
Chuy, M. & Nitulescu, R., (2013). PISA: Explaining the gender gap in reading through reading engagement and approaches to learning. British Educational Research Journal 14(2), 1–38.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
Cunningham, U., (2015). Teaching English pronunciation online to Swedish primary-school teachers. In E. Waniek & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Teaching and researching the pronunciation of English (pp. 63–77). Springer.
Dam, L. (1995). From theory to classroom practice. Authentic.
Fafulas, S. A., Henriksen, N., & O’Rourke, E. (2022). Sound change and gender-based differences in isolated regions: Acoustic analysis of intervocalic phonemic stops by Bora-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Linguistics Vanguard, 8, 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0078
Farrell, T. S., & Jacobs, G. M. (2020). Essentials for successful English language teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ghorbandordinejad, F., & Ahmadabad, R. M. (2016). Examination of the relationship between autonomy and English achievement as mediated by foreign language classroom anxiety. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(3), 739-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9371-5
Hancock, A., Colton, L., & Douglas, F. (2014). Intonation and gender perception: Applications for transgender speakers. Journal of Voice, 28(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.009
Hirschfeld, U., & Trouvain, J. (2007). Teaching prosody in German as a foreign language. In J. Trouvain & U. Gut (Eds.), Non-native prosody: Trends in linguistics studies and monographs (pp.171-189). Mouton de Gruyter.
Huang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Intonation and gender difference: A gender-based analysis of intonational features in the talk show. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 8(7), 67–83.
Jiang, H. (2011). Gender Difference in English Intonation. Paper presented at the ICPhS.
Klinger, D.A., Shulha, L.A. & Wade-Woolley, L., (2010). Towards an understanding of gender differences in literacy achievement. The Education Alliance, 1, 2–14.
Komenda, S., Oduor, J. A. N., & Jerono, P. (2022). Differences of age and gender in pitch range modulation in yes-no questions in Ekegusii. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 9, 49-69.
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Leyns, C., Papeleu, T., Feryn, T., De Baer, S., Bettens, K., Corthals, P., & D’haeseleer, E. (2022). Age and gender differences in Belgian Dutch intonation. Journal of Voice, 36(4). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.12.011
Linville, S. E. (2001). Vocal aging. Singular Thomson Learning.
Linville, S. E., & Fisher, H. B. (1985). Acoustic characteristics of perceived versus actual vocal age in controlled phonation by adult females. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 78(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392452
Linville, S. E., & Rens, J. (2001). Vocal tract resonance analysis of aging voice using long-term average spectra. Journal of Voice, 15(3), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(01)00034-0
Macaskill, A., & Taylor, E. (2010). The development of a brief measure of learner autonomy in university students. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903502703
Manke, M. (1990). Courtney Cazden, Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1988. pp. vii–230. Language in Society, 19(3), 436–439.
Mansooji, H., & Ghaleshahzari, A. (2022). EFL learner autonomy: Iranian university instructors’ beliefs vs. actual practices1. Mextesol Journal, 46 (1), 1-16.
McConnell-Ginet, S. (2011). Gender, sexuality, and meaning: Linguistic practice and politics. Oxford University Press.
Michael, O. (2018). Hesitations as gender marker: A discourse intonation approach. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 4, 10–88.
Nguyen, S. V., & Habók, A. (2020). Non-English-major students’ perceptions of learner autonomy and factors influencing learner autonomy in Vietnam. Relay Journal, 3(1), 122-139.
Nguyen, S. V., & Habók, A. (2021). Designing and validating the learner autonomy perception questionnaire. Heliyon, 7(4), 31-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06831
Orakci, S., & Gelisli, Y. (2017). Learner autonomy scale: A scale development study. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 25-35.
Pawlak, M. (2010). Teaching foreign language pronunciation: Issues in research focus and methodology. In E. Waniek-Klimczak (Ed.), Issues in accents of English 2 (pp. 169–183). Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Shevchenko, O. G. (2015). Sociolinguistic perspective on teaching English intonation for adult learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 607–613. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.045
Sobko, I. (2021). Gender features of intonation contours. In O.V. Zubenko (Ed.), Topical issues of humanities, technical, and natural sciences (pp. 225–229). Vinnytsia
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49(4), 1114–1128. http://doi.org/10.2307/1128751
Teng, M. F. (2019). Learner identity and learners’ investment in EFL learning: A multiple case study. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(1), 43–60. http://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2019.120632
Velde, D. J., Frijns, J. H., Beers, M., van Heuven, V. J., Levelt, C. C., Briaire, J., & Schiller, N. O. (2018). Basic measures of prosody in spontaneous speech of children with early and late cochlear implantation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(12), 3075–3094. http://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0233
Wilden, E., Porsch, R., & Schurig, M. (2020). An early start in primary EFL education and the role of teacher qualification and teaching quality. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2(1), 28-51. https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19002.wil
Wrembel, M. (2007). Metacompetence-based approach to the teaching of L2 prosody: Practical implications. In W. Bisang, H. Henrich Hock, & W. Winter (Eds.), Trends in linguistics studies and monographs (pp. 189–209). Mouton.
Yangklang, W. (2013). Improving English stress and intonation pronunciation of the first year students of Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat university through an E-learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 91, 444-452. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.442
Young-Scholten, M. (2013). Great expectations in phonology? Second language acquisition research and its relation to the teaching of older and younger learners. Universal grammar and the second language classroom. Educational Linguistics, 16, 207-229.
Zhang, F., & Yin, P. (2009). A study of pronunciation problems of English learners in China. Asian Social Science, 5(6), 141–146.