The Impact of Doing Problem-Solving Tasks on Willingness to Communicate, Self-perceived Communication Competence, and Communication Apprehension among Iranian EFL Learners
Subject Areas : آموزش زبان انگلیسیAmir Marzban 1 * , مریم محمودوند 2
1 - Department of English, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran
2 - Departments of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mazandaran, Iran
Keywords: Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, self-perceived communication competence, problem-solving tasks,
Abstract :
Willingness to communicate (WTC) plays a central role in learning a second/foreign language. The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of doing problem-solving task on learners’ WTC in English. To fulfill the purpose of the study, 61 pre-intermediate learners were chosen by means of administrating a placement test. Learners were pretested through three scales of WTC and its two antecedents: self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) and communication apprehension (CA). Of course, the experimental group was provided with fifteen problem-solving tasks during the course, while the control group was not. After fifteen sessions of the treatment, two groups were posttested through the same three scales. The results demonstrated that the experimental group outperformed the control group in terms of their WTC’s level. Moreover, the learners’ WTC was found to be directly related to their SPCC and indirectly related to CA. So based on the MacIntyre’s path model (1994), these both antecedents can be the best predictors of WTC. The analysis of the data was done through multivariate analysis of variances (MANOVA) statistical programs.
Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000).The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 311–341.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4thed.). New York: A Pearson Education Company.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy New York: Pearson Education Company.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1-47.
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: a comparison of behaviour in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System 34, 480–493.
Clement, R., Baker, S. C., &MacIntyre, P. D. (2003). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The effects of context, norms, and vitality. Journal of Languageand Social Psychology, 22, 190-209.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freiermuth, M., & Jarrell, D. (2006). Willingness to communicate: can online chat help? International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16 (2), 189-212.
Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, Gh. H., &Asadpour, F. (2012).Willingness to communicate in English among Iranian non–English major university students.Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31 (2), 197–211.
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20 (2), 29-70.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B. & Cope, J. (1986).Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.
Kim, S. J. (2004). Exploring willingness to communicate (WTC) in English among Korean EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students in Korea: WTC as a predictor of success in second language acquisition.Unpublished DoctoralDissertation, Columbus: Ohio State University.
MacIntyre, P. D., &Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3-26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. (1998).Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation.TheModern Language Journal, 82, 545-562.
MacIntyre, P. D., Babin, P. A., &Cle´ment, R. (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents and consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47, 215–229.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Conrad, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 369-388.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. LanguageLearning, 52, 537-564.
MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S., Cle´ment, R., & Donovan, L. A., (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs.Canadian Modern Language Review 59, 589-607.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Donovan, L. A. (2004).Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehensiory and self-perceived competence.Communication Researcher Reports, 21 (4), 420-427
MacIntyre, P. D., (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 564–576.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System Journal, 38, 161-171.
McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E., (1985). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. In: Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Denver, CO.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987).Willingness to Communicate. In J. C. McCroskey and J. A. Daly, Personality and Interpersonal Communication(pp.129-156), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1990). Willingness to communicate: Differing cultural perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 72-77.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1991). Willingness to communicate: A cognitive view. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 19-37.
McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale.Communication Quarterly, 40, 16-25.
Nunan, D., (2005). Task-Based Language Teaching.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Riasati, M. J., &Noordin, N. (2011). Antecedents of willingness to communicate: A Review of Literature. Cscanada, Studies in Literature and Language, 3 (2), 74-80.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, Th. S. (2001).Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Tiu, V. G. (2011). Classroom opportunities that foster willingness to communicate, Philippine ESL Journal, 6, 3-23.
Van den Brandon, K., (2006). Task-Based Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yamini, M., Rashidi, N., &Shafiei, E. (2010).On the relationship between EFL learners’ oralcommunication apprehension and self-esteem.Ferdowsi Review, 1, 33-55.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86 (1), 54-66.
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide L., & Shimizu, K. (2004).The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication.Language Learning, 54 (1), 119-152.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007).Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.