The Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication on Reading Comprehension and Reading Self-efficacy of Iranian EFL Learners

Subject Areas : آموزش زبان انگلیسی

Azize Mahdavi ¹ , Roya Ranjbar Mohammadi ^{2 *} , Hasssan Assadollahfam ³ , Ali Abdollahi ⁴

1 - گروه آموزش زبان انگليسي، واحد بناب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي، بناب، ايران
2 - Department of English Language, Bonab branch, Bonab, iran
3 - Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University Bonab
4 - استادیار گروه ریاضی، واحد مراغه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي، مراغه، ايران

Received: 2024-09-11 Accepted : 2025-01-14 Published : 2024-11-17

Keywords: Online communication, Real-time interaction, social-cognitive theory, sociocultural theory, technology-enhanced language learning,

Abstract :

The current study aimed to investigate the effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension and self-efficacy. To this end, 56 elementary EFL learners were assigned to one of the two experimental groups. Those trained in online video and audio instruction were assigned to the synchronous CMC group (N=27), while the participants who were taught through offline and recorded instruction were assigned to the asynchronous CMC group (N=29). Before and after the treatment, a questionnaire on reading self-efficacy and reading comprehension tests were administered. Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare the reading comprehension and self-efficacy scores of the students in the two groups. Meanwhile, paired samples t-test and Wilcoxon test were used to do a within-group comparison of the pretest and the posttest scores. The findings showed that although both synchronous and asynchronous CMC significantly affected the reading comprehension and the self-efficacy of EFL learners, the synchronous instruction was more effective because the means of the synchronous group in the reading comprehension and self-efficacy posttests were higher than the means in the asynchronous group. This study has important implications for EFL teachers, EFL students, and syllabus designers.

 

References:

References
Abrams, Z. I. (2008). Sociopragmatic features of learner-to-learner computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i1.1-27

AbuSeileek, A. F., & Qatawneh, K. (2013). Effects of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) oral conversations on English language learners' discourse functions. Computers & Education, 62, 181-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.013

Ackert, P., Lee, L., & Haynes, H. (2005). Thoughts & Notions. Thomson Heinle.

Ajabshir, Z. F. (2019). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on EFL learners' pragmatic competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 169-177.

Ajabshir, Z. F., & Sadeghi, K. (2019). The impact of synchronous computer-mediated instruction (CAI) on EFL learners’ vocabulary uptake across different proficiency levels. Teaching English with Technology, 19(3), 68-89.

An, Y. J., & Frick, T. (2006). Student perceptions of asynchronous computer-mediated communication in face-to-face courses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 485-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00023.x

Anam, S. U., & Stracke, E. (2020). The role of self‐efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language among young Indonesians. TESOL Journal, 11(1), e00440. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.440

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and
where it’s heading. London: Routledge.

Bueno-Alastuey, M. C. (2013). Interactional feedback in synchronous voice-based computer mediated communication: Effect of dyad. System, 41(3), 543-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.05.005

Carrington-Shipley, J. (2001). Computer-mediated communication to develop self-efficacy
behaviors in student teaching. (Doctoral dissertation, Baylor University). Available from
Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global database. (UMI No. 3032105).

Cavana, M. L. P. (2009). Closing the circle: From Dewey to web 2.0. In Information technology and constructivism in higher education: Progressive learning frameworks (pp. 1-13). IGI Global.

Dumanig, F. P., David, M. K., & Jubilado, R. (2011). Computer-mediated reading and its impact on learners’ reading comprehension skills. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on E-Learning, 10-11 Nov 2011, United Kingdom. https://eprints.um.edu.my/13558/1/computer_mediated_reading.pdf

Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact of synchronous and asynchronous settings of online teaching and learning in higher education on students’ learning experience during COVID-19. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 733554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733554

Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied linguistics, 6(1), 19-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.1.19

Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 285-292.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2012.09.005

Goertler, S. (2009). Using computer‐mediated communication (CMC) in language teaching. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German, 42(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1221.2009.00038.x
Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@ internet, 4(1).

Herring, S., Dieter, S. & Tuija, V. (2013). Introduction to the pragmatics of computer-mediated communication. In: S. Herring, S. Dieter & V. Tuija, Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication (3-32). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214468.3

Hsieh, P. C., & Ji, C. H. (2013). The effects of computer-mediated communication by a course management system (Moodle) on English reading achievement and perceptions. In International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology for Education. Retrieved from
http://www.atlantis-press.com/php/download_paper.php?id=8820.

Hung, Y. W., & Higgins, S. (2016). Learners’ use of communication strategies in text-based and video-based synchronous computer-mediated communication environments: Opportunities for language learning. Computer assisted language learning, 29(5), 901-924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1074589

Johnson, G. (2006). Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: A review of recent research. Tech Trends, 50, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-006-0046-9

Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2003(100), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.117

Jones, A., Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2010). Assessment in schools: Technology education
and ICT. In International Encyclopaedia of Education (Vol. 3, pp. 311 - 315):
Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00321-3

Khodaparast, F., & Ghafournia, N. (2015). The effect of asynchronous/synchronous approaches on English vocabulary achievement: A study of Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 8(4), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n4p117

Kleinke, S. (2010). Interactive aspects of computer-mediated communication. Discourses in interaction, 203, 195. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.203.15kle
Lantolf, J. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.

Lazou, C., Tsinakos, A. (2022). Computer-Mediated Communication for Collaborative Learning in Distance Education Environments. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing the Learner and Teacher Experience. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13328. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05657-4_19

Lee, A., Lee, J. Y., & Jung, E. (2023). University students’ experience of online space while engaging in synchronous learning via videoconferencing amidst the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1083754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1083754

Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Teacher candidate reflection: Benefits of using a synchronous computer-mediated communication-based virtual exchange. Teaching and Teacher Education, 92, 103041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103041

Lin, H. (2014). Establishing an empirical link between computer-mediated communication
(CMC) and SLA: A meta-analysis of the research. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 120–147.

Lin, S., & Overbaugh, R. C. (2009). Computer‐mediated discussion, self‐efficacy and gender. British journal of educational technology, 40(6), 999-1013. https://doi/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00889.x

McCoy, C. (2010). Perceived self-efficacy and technology proficiency in undergraduate college students. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1614-1617. https://doi/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.003

McGirt, S. (2017). Improving academic self-efficacy in reading comprehension skills of 8th grade gifted and talented students (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Kaia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning. US Department of Education.

Meier, J. V., Noel, J. A., & Kaspar, K. (2021). Alone together: computer-mediated communication in leisure time during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 666655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666655

Mirzaei, A., & Taheri, F. (2016). Task-based collaborative interaction in a CMC environment: A form-focused perspective. Teaching English Language, 10(2), 113-149. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.[phone]

Nami, F. (2022). Synchronous-Asynchronous Blending or Fully Real-Time Course Delivery? Implications for Distance Language Education. Issues in Language Teaching, 11(1), 157-187. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2022.64715.656

Niemiec, T., & Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K. (2015). The moderating role of specific self-efficacy in the impact of positive mood on cognitive performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 498-505. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s11031-014-9469-3

Niu, Z., Willoughby, J., and Zhou, R. (2021). Associations of health literacy, social media use, and self-efficacy with health information–seeking intentions among social media users in China: cross-sectional survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 23:e19134. https://doi.org/10.2196/19134.

Ogwu, S., Sice, P., Keogh, S., & Goodlet, C. (2020). An exploratory study of the application of mindsight in email communication. Heliyon, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04305

Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2013). Exploring asynchronous and synchronous tool use in online courses. Computers & Education, 60(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.007

Pintrich, P. & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education. Prentice-Hall.

Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., Schnaubert, L., & Rey, G. D. (2022). The cognitive-affective-social theory of learning in digital environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5

Shang, H. F. (2023). Incorporating Computer-Mediated Communications in EFL Reading. Technical Communication, 70(2), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.55177/tc454765

Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports, 51(2), 663-671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663

Shintani, N. (2016). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing: a case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 517-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review.
Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 157–190.
https://doi.org/10.28945/3502

Tran, K., & McCollum, W. R. (2016). Computer-Mediated Communication Technologies and Self-Efficacy in Online Learning, 1(1), 1-16.

Tusino, T., Sukarni, S., & Rokhayati, T. (2021). Hybrid Synchronous and asynchronous language learning in writing class: The learners’ psychosocial perspectives in Indonesia. The New Educational Review, 65, 190-199. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2021.65.3.15

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, C., Wang. L., & Li, Y. (2007). Chinese secondary school self-regulated learners
of English. Paper presented at TESOL (Teachers of English to Speakers of Other
Languages) 2007 Convention, Seattle, WA.

Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2007). The relationship between computer-mediated-communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence, and social presence. Southern Communication Journal, 72(4), 355-378.
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10417940701667696

Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778

Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts: methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146–165.
Young, A., & Son, J. B. (2023). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and task-based learning in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 13621688231191309. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231191309

Yu, H., & Hu, J. (2023). A multilevel regression analysis of computer-mediated communication in synchronous and asynchronous contexts and digital reading achievement in Japanese students. Interactive learning environments, 31(10), 7261-7275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2066136

Yuyun, I. (2023). Investigating university student engagement in online learning: A case study in EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 634-653. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i3.46035

Zare, M., & Mobarakeh, S. D. (2011). The relationship between self-efficacy and use of reading strategies: The case of Iranian senior high school students. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.sll.1923156320110303.148

Zeng, G. (2017). Collaborative dialogue in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face communication. ReCALL, 29(3), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000118

Zeinali Nejad, M., Golshan, M., & Naeimi, A. (2021). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on learners’ pronunciation achievement. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1872908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1872908

Zhao, Y., & Lai, C. (2008). Technology and second language learning: Promises and problems. In L. L. Parker (Ed.), Technology-mediated learning environments for young English learners: Connections in and out of school (pp. 167–205). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zhong, L., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Computerized mediated explicit instruction and EFL learners' knowledge of speech acts: Investigating the role of EFL learners’ language proficiency and perceptions. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19738