اولویت‌بندی مؤلفههای کاربرد فناوری اطلاعات از نگاه مدیریت تغییر در وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران
محورهای موضوعی : فن‎آوری اطلاعاتسمانه یارمحمدی 1 , فریده اشرف‌گنجویی 2 , علی زارعی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت سازمان‌های ورزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاهآزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشیار گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاهآزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: ورزش و جوانان, کاربرد فناوری&lrm, اطلاعات, مدیریت&lrm, تغییر,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این پژوهش اولویت‌بندی مؤلفههای کاربرد فناوری اطلاعات از نگاه مدیریت تغییر در وزارت ورزش و جوانان جمهوری اسلامی ایران است. روش‌شناسی این تحقیق از نوع توصیفی- پیمایشی و از حیث هدف از نوع کاربردی است.جامعه آماری، 812 نفر از کارمندان کلیه بخش‌های وزارت ورزش و جوانان در سال 1395 است. نمونه آماری بر اساس فرمول کوکران 261 نفرمحاسبه شد که به صورت تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدهاند. جهت جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از دو پرسش‌نامه استاندارد و بینالمللی تمبرای فناوری اطلاعات و ادکار برای مدیریت تغییر استفادهگردیده است. داده‌های پژوهش از طریق آمار توصیفی و استنباطی شامل آزمون کالموگروف- اسمیرنف، آزمون t تک نمونه‌ای، ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و آزمون رگرسیون چندگانه مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که ارتباط مثبت معنی‌داری بین مؤلفههای کاربرد فناوری اطلاعات شامل، سودمندی ادراک شده، سهولت درک شده، نگرش نسبت به کاربرد و تمایل به استفاده؛ با مدیریت تغییر مشاهده می‌شود. هم‌چنین، در اولویت‌بندی مؤلفههای کاربرد فناوری اطلاعات از نگاه مدیریت تغییر به ترتیب سودمندی درک شده، تمایل به استفاده، نگرش نسبت به‌کاربرد و در نهایت، سهولت درک شده اولویت اول تا چهارم را دارند.
The purpose of this research is to prioritize the components of information technology application from the perspective of change management in the Ministry of Sports and Youth of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The methodology of this research is descriptive-survey and based on the purpose is applied. The statistical society is 812 employees of all departments of the Ministry of Sports and Youth in 2016. The sample was calculated 261 based on Cochran formula that was selected by stratified random sampling. To collect information, two standard and international questionnaires were used: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and ADKAR for change management. Data were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics including Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, single sample t test, Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression test. The results showed that there is a significant positive relationship between the components of information technology application including perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude towards application and willingness to use; with change management. Also, in prioritizing the components of the use of information technology from the perspective of change management; perceived usefulness, the tendency to use, attitude towards the use and finally the perceived ease of the first to fourth priority respectively.
Akhavan, A. (2006). Change management to IT implementation. Tadbir, 166, 173-175. (in Persian).
Al-gahtani, S. (2003). Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: Correlates of perceived innovation attributes. Information Technology for Development, 10(1), 57-69.
Alidousti, S. (2006). Barriers to use of IT from the perspective of change management. Library and Information, 7(3), 13-25. (in Persian).
Alrafi, A. (2005). Technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(4), 6-10.
Asrafganjouei, F. (2010). The study stuff manager`s attitudes of physical education organizations toward dimensions of changing management. Sport Management Review, 5, 125-129. (in Persian).
Atashak, M. (2010). Identify and rank of effective barriers of non-using teachers from IT. Ethics in Science & Technology, 5(2), 115-122. (in Persian).
Barbaroux, P. (2011). A design‐oriented approach to organizational change: Insights from a military case study. Organizational Change Management, 24(5),14-17.
Bohene, R. (2012). Resistance to organisational change: A case study of Oti Yeboah Complex Limited. International Business and Management, 4(1), 135-145.
Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Working Papers on Information Systems. 1-14.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 3-5.
Dehning, B., & Richardson, J. (2002). Returns on investments in information technology: A research synthesis. Information Systems, 16(1), 7-30.
DuPlooy, N. F. (1998). An analysis of the human environment for the adoption and use of information technology. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pretoria, South Africa. 335-337.
Edwards, S. (2002). Information technology and economic challenge in developing countries. Challenge. The Information Society, 18(2), 19-43.
Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. Development Informatics Working Paper Series, No.11/2002. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management. Retrieved January 04, from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk
Kunda, D., & Laurence, B. (2000). Assessing important factors that support component based development in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 42(10), 715-725.
Lee, S., & Kim, B. G. (2009). Factors affecting the usage of Internet: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 191-201.
Malekinajafdar, A. (2012). The impact of factor effecting the adaption and application of IT (south of Tehran's Tax Departments). Information Technology Management, 9(4), 89-102. (in Persian).
Moafi, E. (2009). Survey the problem and obstacles to the use of IT in regional. Electricity Company of Mazandaran, 5(3), 43-54. (in Persian).
Nafari, N. (2011). Designing an information acceptance model in the National Iranian Gas Company based on the technology acceptance model. Information Technology Managemen, 7(2), 147-152. (in Persian).
Oreg, S. (2013). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-101.
Peansupap, V., & Walker, D. (2005). Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organization. Construction Innovation,5(3), 135-157.
Prosci. (2003). A model for change management. Retrieved from https://www.prosci. com/adkar
Rahmani, G. (2012) . Assessment of the acceptance and use of information technology in industrial environments. Information Technology, 7(4), 137-156. (in Persian).
Rezaee, M. (2010). Common Theories of IT Acceptance. Communication Research, 16, 101-105. (in Persian).
Sahragardjahromi, A. (2005). The effect of information technology influence on organizational productivity from the viewpoint of managers. Information Technology, 1(7), 12-18. (in Persian).
Sanayeyi, A. (2013). Barriers to using information technology in sport and youth departments of Fars province using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sport Management (Harakat), 6(2), 325-341. (in Persian).
Sarayeh B., & Khodair H. (2013). Comparative study: The Kurt Lewin of change management. International of Computer and Information Technology, 2(4), 6-9.
Sharma, J. (2003). A dictionary of information technology. India: CBS, 2003.
Sohal, A. S., Moss, S., & Ng, L. (2001). Comparing IT success in manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 30-45.
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53-78.
Tokic, D., & Feinberg, M. (2004). ITC investment, GDP and stoch market values in Asia-Pacific NIC and developing countries. Asia Pacific Economy, 9(1), 70-84.
Ziemba, E., (2015). Change management in information systems project for public organizations in Poland. Interdiciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management, 10,47-62.
_||_Akhavan, A. (2006). Change management to IT implementation. Tadbir, 166, 173-175. (in Persian).
Al-gahtani, S. (2003). Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: Correlates of perceived innovation attributes. Information Technology for Development, 10(1), 57-69.
Alidousti, S. (2006). Barriers to use of IT from the perspective of change management. Library and Information, 7(3), 13-25. (in Persian).
Alrafi, A. (2005). Technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(4), 6-10.
Asrafganjouei, F. (2010). The study stuff manager`s attitudes of physical education organizations toward dimensions of changing management. Sport Management Review, 5, 125-129. (in Persian).
Atashak, M. (2010). Identify and rank of effective barriers of non-using teachers from IT. Ethics in Science & Technology, 5(2), 115-122. (in Persian).
Barbaroux, P. (2011). A design‐oriented approach to organizational change: Insights from a military case study. Organizational Change Management, 24(5),14-17.
Bohene, R. (2012). Resistance to organisational change: A case study of Oti Yeboah Complex Limited. International Business and Management, 4(1), 135-145.
Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions. Working Papers on Information Systems. 1-14.
Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 3-5.
Dehning, B., & Richardson, J. (2002). Returns on investments in information technology: A research synthesis. Information Systems, 16(1), 7-30.
DuPlooy, N. F. (1998). An analysis of the human environment for the adoption and use of information technology. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pretoria, South Africa. 335-337.
Edwards, S. (2002). Information technology and economic challenge in developing countries. Challenge. The Information Society, 18(2), 19-43.
Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. Development Informatics Working Paper Series, No.11/2002. Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management. Retrieved January 04, from http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk
Kunda, D., & Laurence, B. (2000). Assessing important factors that support component based development in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 42(10), 715-725.
Lee, S., & Kim, B. G. (2009). Factors affecting the usage of Internet: A confirmatory study. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 191-201.
Malekinajafdar, A. (2012). The impact of factor effecting the adaption and application of IT (south of Tehran's Tax Departments). Information Technology Management, 9(4), 89-102. (in Persian).
Moafi, E. (2009). Survey the problem and obstacles to the use of IT in regional. Electricity Company of Mazandaran, 5(3), 43-54. (in Persian).
Nafari, N. (2011). Designing an information acceptance model in the National Iranian Gas Company based on the technology acceptance model. Information Technology Managemen, 7(2), 147-152. (in Persian).
Oreg, S. (2013). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-101.
Peansupap, V., & Walker, D. (2005). Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion and adoption within Australian construction organization. Construction Innovation,5(3), 135-157.
Prosci. (2003). A model for change management. Retrieved from https://www.prosci. com/adkar
Rahmani, G. (2012) . Assessment of the acceptance and use of information technology in industrial environments. Information Technology, 7(4), 137-156. (in Persian).
Rezaee, M. (2010). Common Theories of IT Acceptance. Communication Research, 16, 101-105. (in Persian).
Sahragardjahromi, A. (2005). The effect of information technology influence on organizational productivity from the viewpoint of managers. Information Technology, 1(7), 12-18. (in Persian).
Sanayeyi, A. (2013). Barriers to using information technology in sport and youth departments of Fars province using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sport Management (Harakat), 6(2), 325-341. (in Persian).
Sarayeh B., & Khodair H. (2013). Comparative study: The Kurt Lewin of change management. International of Computer and Information Technology, 2(4), 6-9.
Sharma, J. (2003). A dictionary of information technology. India: CBS, 2003.
Sohal, A. S., Moss, S., & Ng, L. (2001). Comparing IT success in manufacturing and service industries. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 30-45.
Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53-78.
Tokic, D., & Feinberg, M. (2004). ITC investment, GDP and stoch market values in Asia-Pacific NIC and developing countries. Asia Pacific Economy, 9(1), 70-84.
Ziemba, E., (2015). Change management in information systems project for public organizations in Poland. Interdiciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management, 10,47-62.