درک نقش الگوهای ذهنی مدیران در رفتار کاری نوآورانه در سازمان‌های دولتی با بهره‌گیری از روش کیو
محورهای موضوعی : تربیتی
1 - گروه مدیریت، واحد پارس آباد مغان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، پارس آباد مغان، ایران.
کلید واژه: مدیران, سازمان‌های دولتی, روش‌شناسی کیو, الگوی ذهنی, رفتار کاری نوآورانه,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش، شناخت و درک دیدگاه‌ها و الگوهای ذهنی مدیران سازمان‌های دولتی درباره عوامل اثرگذار در رفتار کاری نوآورانه بود. روش پژوهش از نوع پژوهش‌های آمیخته است که ایدة اصلی آن شناخت ذهنیت‌ها، دیدگاه‌ها، عقاید و نگرش‌های افراد دربارة پدیدة مورد بررسی است. جامعۀ آماری پژوهش شامل همۀ مدیران ارشد سازمان‌های دولتی شهر تهران در سال 1398 بودند. نمونۀ مورد مطالعه 24 نفر از مدیران ارشد سازمان‌های دولتی شهر تهران بودند که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند و از طریق مصاحبة عمیق فضای گفتمان حاصل شد و با استفاده از نظرات آن‌ها نمونه و گزینه‌های کیو و در پی آن مجموعه کیو به‌دست آمد. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روش‌شناسی کیو استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل مشتمل بر شناسایی عوامل تشکیل‌دهندۀ ذهنیت مدیران در راستای رفتار کاری نوآورانه و همچنین تبیین ذهنیت‌های مدیران در این رابطه است. نتایج نشان‌دهندة آن است که بررسی فرصت‌ها، تولید ایده، ارتقای ایده، محقق کردن ایده و تعمق پنج ذهنیت اصلی مدیران در راستای رفتار کاری نوآورانه است.
The aim of this study was to identify and understand the views and mental models of managers of government organizations on the factors influencing innovative work behavior. The research method is a type of mixed research the main idea is to know people's mindsets, views, opinions and attitudes about the phenomenon under study. The statistical population was all senior managers of government organizations in Tehran in 2020 The study sample consisted of 24 senior managers of government agencies in Tehran which were selected by targeted sampling method and obtained through in-depth interview of the discourse space and using their comments, the sample and options of Q and then the collection of Q were obtained. Q methodology was used to analyze the data. The results of the analysis include identifying the factors that make up managers 'mindsets in line with innovative work behavior, as well as explaining managers' mindsets in this regard. The results show that examining opportunities, generating ideas, promoting ideas, realizing ideas, and reflecting on the five main mentalities of managers in the direction of innovative work behavior.
Agbooyee Ardakan, M., Naddafi, T., Gholipour, A. (2018). Investigation of Managers’ Mental Modeling regarding Strategic Thinking. The University of Tehran’s Scientific Journals Database. 10 (2), 451- 185. [persian]
Diaz, M. J., Fernandez, J. M., & Mantilla, R. (2017). Impact of implementation of quality management systems on internal communications and external relations at schools. Taylor & Francis Publisher.
Han, Y., & Li, D. (2015). Effects of intellectual capital on innovative performance: The role of knowledge-based dynamic capability. Management Decision, 53(1), 40–56.
Hall, R. D., & Rowland, C. A. (2016). Leadership development for managers in turbulent times. Journal of Management Development, 35(8), 942-955.
Hosseini, M. H., Keshavarz, E. (2018). Identifying and ranking of factors affecting organizational entrepreneurship with the aim of corporate performance improvement using Fuzzy AHP technique (Case: Coil manufacturing industry). Human Resource Management in Oil Industry, 9 (36), 213-242. [persian]
Javed, A., Anas, M., Abas, M. & Khan, A. L. (2017). Flexible Human Resource Management and Firm Innovativeness: Mediating Role of Innovative
Work Behavior. Journal of Human Resource Management, 20 (1), 31-41. [persian]
Jahangir, M., Khorakian, A., & Lagzia, M. (2016). The Impacts of Work Engagement on Innovative Behavior with an Emphasis on the Mediatory Role of Sharing Mistakes. Innovation Management Journal, 5(1), 29-52. [persian]
Kalkan, A., Çetinkaya Bozkurt, O., & Arman, M. (2014). The Impacts of Intellectual Capital, Innovation and Organizational Strategy on Firm Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 700–707.
Khalilipour, H., & Hossein, K. (2018). Examining Structural Effects Procedural Justice and Work Engagement on Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Work Behavior. Organization Behavior Studies Quarterly, (6(4), 27-52. [persian]
Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining Structural Relationships between Work Engagement, Organizational Procedural Justice, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovative Work Behavior for Sustainable Organizations. Sustainability, 9(2), 1-16.
Martignoni, D., Menon, A., & Siggelkow, N. (2016). Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management Journal, 37(13), 2545-2568.
Movahedi, S., Samian, M., & Mohammadi-Mehr, S. (2017). The Effect of Intellectual Capital on Innovative Behaviors of Jihad-Agriculture Organization Personnel, Kermanshah, Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Ecomics and Development Research, 48(1), 123-136. [persian]
Madsen, J. Roy, B., & We, D. P. (2016). Exploring the relationship among human resource flexibility. Organizational Chinese Management Studies, 10(4), 657-674
Menon, A. R., & Yao, D. A. (2017). Rationalizing Outcomes: Mental-Model-Guided Learning in Competitive Markets.
Mura, M., Lettieri, E., Radaelli, G., & Spiller, N. (2013). Promoting professionals’ Innovative Behaviour through Knowledge Sharing: the moderating role of Social Capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 2-12.
Madsen, J. Roy, B., & We, D. P. (2016). Innovative work behavior- the role of human resource management and affective commitment, A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of ISM University Management and Economics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Innovation and Technology Management.
Rastgar, A., & Maghsoodi. T. (2016). The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Innovation: Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Management Studies in Development and Evolution. 25(80), 157-182. [persian]
Ren, F., & Zhang, J. (2015). Job Stressors, Organizational Innovation Climate, and Employees’ Innovative Behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 2(7), 16-23.
Sabet, A., Davodi, A., & Hashemi, A. (2015). rokni E. Causal model to evaluate variables related to innovative behavior, faculty, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. J Med Educ Dev, 8(17) 1-11. [persian]
Safari, A., & Kheyri, N. (2018). Identify the Employees' Mental Pattern about Electronic Monitoring at Work by Q Method. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 22(88), 91-117. [persian]
Spiegelaere, S., Gyes, G. & Hootegem, G. (2016). Not All Autonomy is the same. Different Dimensions of Job Autonomy and Their Relation to Work Engagement & Innovative Work Behavior. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26(4), 515-527.
Shiri, A., & Dehgani, M. (2016). The Role of Trust to Innovation in Relation between "Person-Organization Fit" and "Innovative Work Behavior" in Knowledge-based Firms (Case Study: Science and Technology Park of Tehran University). Journal of Technology Development Management, 3(4), 43-76. [persian]
Wang, X. H. F., Fang, Y., Qureshi, I. & Janssen, O. (2015). Understanding employee innovative behavior: Integrating the social network and leader–member exchange perspectives. Journal of organizational Behavior, 36(3), 403-420.
Wakili, Y., Jafarinia, S., & Rafiee, N. (2019). The Effect of Human Resources Flexibility on Innovative Work Behavior: Explaining the Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. Organozation Behavior Studies Quarterly, 7(4), 31-52. [persian]
Zacher, H., Chan, F., Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2015). Selection, optimization, and compensation strategies: Interactive effects on daily work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 8 (7), 101-107.
_||_