رابطه بین ابعاد استاد اثربخش از دیدگاه دانشجویان با سبکهای یادگیری آنها
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیفاطمه اکبری منجرموئی 1 , نرگس کشتی آرای 2
1 - 1دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد برنامه ریزی آموزشی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
2 - 2استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: سبکهای یادگیری, مدیریت کلاس, فرایند تدریس, ویژگیهای شخصیتی, استاد اثربخش,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه ابعاد استاد اثربخش از دیدگاه دانشجویان با سبکهای یادگیری دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی خوراسگان در سال تحصیلی 92-91 به روش توصیفی ـ تبیینی انجام گرفت. حجم جامعه مشتمل بر 3548 نفر دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد بودند که با استفاده از جدول مورگان 346 نفر آنها با استفاده از روش نمونهگیری تصادفی طبقهای انتخاب شدند. ابزار جمعآوری اطلاعات پرسشنامه محقق ساخته ابعاد استاد اثربخش در چهار حیطه (ویژگیهای شخصیتی، مدیریت کلاس درس، فرایند تدریس، ویژگیهای دموگرافیک) با 89 گویه و پرسشنامه سبکهای یادگیری کلب شامل 12 سؤال بود. برای تعیین روایی پرسشنامه ابعاد استاد اثر بخش از روایی صوری و محتوایی و برای برآورد پایایی پرسشنامه از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد که پایایی آن 96/0 محاسبه شد. پایایی پرسشنامه سبکهای یادگیری کلب 79/0 محاسبه شده است. تجزیه و تحلیل دادههای پژوهش در دو سطح آمار توصیفی و استنباطی انجام گرفت. نتایج حاصل از تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها نشان داد که ویژگیهای شخصیتی استاد، ویژگیهای مدیریت کلاس درس استاد و ویژگیهای فرایند تدریس با نوع سبکهای یادگیری دانشجویان ارتباط دارد. ولی، بین ویژگیهای دموگرافیک استاد با سبکهای یادگیری دانشجویان ارتباط معنادار آماری وجود ندارد. همچنین، بین ویژگیهای استاد اثربخش با سبکهای یادگیری دانشجویان ارتباط معنادار آماری دیده شد. علاوه بر آن، نتایج بیانگر آن بود که بین سبکهای یادگیری دانشجویان و ویژگیهای استاد اثربخش به تفکیک جنس و دانشکده از لحاظ آماری تفاوتی وجود ندارد.
The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between the dimensions of an effective professor, from the students' viewpoints, and learning styles of post-graduate students of Islamic Azad University, Khorasgan, in academic year 1391-92.Descriptive-explanatory method was applied in this research. The population included 3548 post graduate students 350 of whom were selected by Morgan Table and stratified random sampling method. Data collecting tool included a researcher-made questionnaire, focusing on the dimensions of an effective professor in four areas (personality characteristics, classroom management, teaching process, demographic features) with 89 items, and Kolb questionnaire of learning styles which included 12 questions. For validity confirmation of the questionnaire of the dimensions of an effective professor, content and face validity were used for reliability, Cronbach Alpha Coefficient was applied (0.96). The reliability of Kolb questionnaire of learning styles was calculated as 0.79. Data were, then, analyzed on two descriptive an inferential statistics levels. The results indicated that teacher's personality characteristics, classroom management, and teaching process were related to the students' learning styles. However, no significant statistical relationship was observed between demographic features of the professor and learning styles of the students. That is to say that the characteristics of an effective professor and learning styles of the students were significantly related. The results also indicated that there was no statistical difference between learning styles of the students and the characteristics of an effective professor according to the gender and faculty.
Adhami Ashraf, Nakhaeei Nozar, Fatahi Zahra. (2003). Investigating the assistants’ opinions from different educational – clinical groups of Kerman Science University about teaching quality. Hormozgan Science magazine. No1,PP 33-38[persian].
Andalib Bahareh, Ahmadi Ghoolamreza. (2007).The degree of deployment of effective teaching criteria by the students’ opinions in Khorasgan Islamic Azad University in Academic Year 2006-2007. Knowledge and research in Education, Khorasgan Islamic Azad University (Isfahan) No15,PP 67-82[Persian]
Ahadi Fatemeh, Abedi Seyedi Jila, Arshadi Farokh, Ghorbani Raheb. (2009). Learning style of Semnan Science University’s nursing and paramedical Science’s college students. Science magazine of Semnan Science University. No2,PP 141-147[Persian]
ASgari Fariba, Mahjoub Moadab Hajar, (2010). Comprising effective teaching features from teachers and students perspectives of Gillan Medical University. Medical Education Development Center magazine. No7,PP 26-33[Persian]
Botelho, M. G. & D. Odonnell (2001); "Assessment of the use ofProblem – Orientated, Small-group Discussion for Learning of aFixed Prosthodontic", Simulation Laboratory Course, BritishDental Journal(BDJ), 191(11), 630-663.
Blegman , Mary , Beth, (2003). Creating a climate for Learning: effectiveClassroom ManagementTechniques.
Brown,N.(2004). What makes a good educator? The relevance of Meta programmer’s Assessment & evaluation in higher education, vol 29, No 3,PP515-533
Chavoshi Elham.( 2009). An investigation of the relationship between Lecturers' teaching approach and the learning approach of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences students. MA thesis, faculty of Educational Sciences, Islamic AzadUniversity of Khorasgan[Persian]
Deal٫S.R (2005). Graduate Studentיs Perceptions of teacher effectiveness٫ PhD dissertation٫ DAI-A 66/03 ٫P.875.
Dabiri Esfahani Ozra, (2006). Investigating the way of teacher’s classroom management based on students’ sex. Educative New thoughts,No1, PP 43-69[Persian]
Dargahi Hossein, hamoozadeh Pejman, Sadeghifar Jamil, Ra'd abadi Mahdi, Roshani Mohammad, Salimi Mohammad, Soltanzadeh Parinaz.( 2010). Evaluation of the established criteria of a competent lecturer for effective teaching from the viewpoint of Tehran University of Medical Sciences students. Journal of Faculty of Paramedics of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (payavord-e-Salamat), No3,PP 91-98[Persian]
Fathi Azar Askandar. (2003). Teaching methods and techniques. First Edition. Tabriz: Tabriz University Publication, 476 pages[Persian]
Gus key.Thomas , R, (2004). How Classroom Assessment Improve Learning,Educational ,Leadership, volume 60, number 5 .
Ghazi Tabatabaei Mahmoud, Yousefi Afrashteh Majeed.(2012). relationships analysis about some parts of related variables with teaching evaluation by students: application of structural equation modeling. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. No 64,PP 83-107[Persian]
Hosseini Laragani Maryam, Seyf Aliakbar, (2001). Comparing college students’ styles of learning according to sex, level of education and course study. Research and planning Seasonal Journal in Higher Education. No19,PP 93-114[Persian]
Harry,K.W.(2010).The well-Managed Classroom, Professional preferences for teachers. copyright by hot. Rinehart and Winston.All right reserved.
Kyriakides,L.,Campbel,R.J.,&Christofidou,E.(2002).Generating Criteria for measuring teacher effectiveness through a self-evaluation approach: A complimentary way of measuring effectiveness .school effectiveness & school improvement,Vol13,No3,PP291-324.
Karamdoust Norouz.( 2004). To check dependency evaluation results of students to master in B.A course in Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of Tehran University. In 77-78 to 79-80 semesters. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, No2,PP 23-40[Persian]
Larrivee, B. (2005). Authentic classroom management: Creating a learning community and building a reflective practice. Boston: Pearson.
Lin XD, schwatz D L & hantano, G O. (2005). Toward teachers adaptive Metacognition. Educational psychologist. Vol4,No4,PP 245-255.
Marandi. (2001). Investigating the criteria of a good teacher from the perspective of student and teachers of Zahedan School of Medicine in 2001-2002. PhD. Thesis of Zahedan School of Medical Sciences[Persian]
Mckenna L. (2002).Meeting the learning needs of clinical nurse teacher: A pilot Program. AEJNE 2002;Vol 2,No 1,PP 1-8.
Malikow, M(2006).Effective Teacher Study, national from of teacher .Education journal- electronic, volume 16,number3.
Miller W R, Miller Mary. (2007). A guide to the teaching in the context of university. Translation by Vida Miri, 4th Edition. Tehran: SAMT (organization for study and codification of universities' humanities books, 333 pages.
Maroufi Yahya.( 2011). Determine the components of teaching for the performance evaluation of faculty members by country Based on the analytic hierarchy process. (A.H.P). Two Journals of Higher Education Association of Iran,No4,PP 143-168[persian].
Mohadesi, Feizi, Salem Safi,( 2011). Comparison of indicators of effective teaching from the perspective of faculty members and Urmiya University of Medical Sciences two magazines of School of Nursing and Midwifery,No 6,PP 464-471[Persian]
Mohagheghiyan Shahnaz, Ahmadi. Gholamreza, SaadatMand Zohreh, (2012). Recognition and application of new teaching models among the humanities faculty members. Research in Curriculum Planning,No 8,PP 48-59[Persian]
Oermann M H.( 2006).Matching Student .Learning Styles.From http://www .Elsevier.
Polk,J.A.(2006). Traits of effective teachers, Arts education Policy Review,No4,PP23-29.
Reynolds, D.Muijs,D.,&Treharne,D.(2004). Teacher evaluation and effectiveness in the United Kingdom,1-33.
Sheehan ٫ E & Duprey٫ T (1999). Student evaluations of university teaching : Statistical data included٫Journal of Instructional Psychology ٫Sep 1999
Seldin,P.(2000). The use and abuse of student rating of professors: the chronical of higher education,[cited 2007 Dec3]. Seul~call~data base / organization. html.
Sha'bani Hasan.( 2004). Educational and teaching skills (teaching methods and techniques). 18th Edition. Tehran: the ministry of culture and Islamic guidance publication,379pages[Persian]
Sharifian Fereydun, Nasr Ahmadreza, Abedi Lotfali. (2005). A discovery of indicators of effective teaching in universities and higher education institutes and its realization rate in University of Isfahan. Quarterly of research and planning in higher education, No37 PP 25- 54[persian.
Strange,J.h.(2007). Qualities of effective teachers (2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Seyf Aliakbar. (2008). Modern educational psychology of teaching and learning. Sixth Edition. Tehran: Doran Publication, 708 pages[persian].
Safavi Amanallah. (2008). A comprehensive account of teaching methods and techniques. 14th Edition. Tehran: Moaser publication, 312 pages[Persian]
Samadi Parvin, Rajaeei Pour Saeed, Agha Hosseini Taghi, Ghalavandi Hasan,( 2008). Implementing effective learning atmosphere based on classroom management components in Orumiye’s elementary schools.Educative new thoughts. No2,PP 155-176[Persian]
Shir Alipour Asghar, Asadi Mas'od, Shakoori Zeynab, Behrangi Mohamadreza, (2012). What are all these commotions about models of teaching, indeed? Research in Curriculum .No7,PP = 73- 83[Persian]
Sobhani Nejad Mehdi, Zamani Manesh Hamed. (2012). Identifying Dimensions of Effective Teacher and Validating its Components by High School Teahers in yasooj. Research in Curriculum Planning.No5,PP 68-81[persian].
Talebzadeh Shoshtari Leyla, Pourshafei Hadi, (2011). Successful professors’ documents about methods of improving motivations of Birjand University students. Reasearch - Planning Seasonal Journal in Higher Education.No 60,PP 81-98[Persian]
Williams & Sternberg,(2000). Classroom management.
Yazdi Monavar. (2009). Comparison of methods and learning styles of Alzahra University students from different schools (Strategy to identify career path). New Thoughts Training No2,PP 123- 145[Persian]
Zhenhui R.( 2001).Matching Teaching Style with Learning Style in East Asia". Contexts Foreign Languages College .Jiangui University The Internet TESL Journal٫vol.VII٫no7٫http://iteslj.org
Zohour, Eslaminejad. (2002). Indicators of effective teaching from Kerman Medical University’s students’ perspectives. Payesh Journal.No 4,PP 5-13[Persian]
Zolfaghar Mohsen, Mehrmohamadi Mahmoud, (2004). Evaluating college students’ liberal art courses of members of scientific broad Tehran’s universities’ cities from teaching quality. Two scientific - research monthly magazine from Shahed University.No 6,PP 17-28[Persian]._||_