Simulating And Validating The Pressure Profile During The Filling And Packing Phases of Injection Molding

Subject Areas : Mechanical Engineering

Laura Stuart ¹ , Ma'moun Abu-Ayyad ²

1 - Principal Engineer, Engineering Manager, M.Eng.
2 - Pennsylvania State University

Received: 2024-04-08 Accepted : 2024-11-21 Published : 2024-11-30

Keywords: Injection Molding Machine, Cavity Pressure, 3D Modeling, Finite Element Analysis,

Abstract :

Autodesk Moldflow Insight (AMI) is a Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) tool used to predict many molding phenomena such as pressure, filling pattern, cooling pattern, and deflection of injection molded parts. The purpose of this study is to validate AMI for use with plastic connector housings and determine the key factors in improving simulation accuracy. To validate AMI, a 3D Computer-Aided Design (CAD) model of a hypothetical, simplified connector housing with round circuit holes was created in Creo software. Then, a test mold was built using the simplified connector housing geometry with round core pins for the part circuit holes. The mold was outfitted with pressure sensors to monitor the exact pressures achieved in both the runner system and cavity. Using this mold, the validation part was manufactured more than fifteen times using an identical combination of material and processing conditions. Pressure sensors placed in the mold capture the exact pressures achieved in the part and runner system during molding. The averaged pressure profiles for each sensor are later compared against results from the simulation software to determine accuracy of the simulation program. Computer simulation models of the validation part were created with a mesh density of eight layers through the thickness of the model, which is appropriate for connector housings. The averaged values of the fifteen identically molded parts are then compared to the simulation results. This study results in an improved method for simulating the pressure profiles during plastic injection molding using refined process parameter definitions.

References:

1. A. Gnatowski, A. Kleczkowska, J. Krzyanski, P. Lemanski, and E. Kopciuszewska, Computer Simulations of Injection Process of Elements Used in Electromechanical Devices. Materials, 2022, 15(7), pp 2511.
2. M. F. Alzoubi, M.F., and M. Abu-Ayyad, “Transient Finite Element Model-Based for Controlling Temperature of Multi-Cast Iron Cylinders in an Injection Molding Machine”. Transaction on Control and Mechanical Systems, 2013, 2(5), 248-254.
3. C. P. Chen, M. T. Chuang, Y. Hsiao, Y. K. Yang, and C. H. Tsai, Simulation and Experimental Study in Determining Injection Molding Process Parameters for Thin-Shell Plastic Parts via Design of Experiments Analysis. Expert Systems with Applications 2009, 36(7), pp 10752-10759.
4. J. Gim, and B. Rhee, Novel Analysis Methodology of Cavity Pressure Profiles in Injection-Molding Processes Using Interpretation of Machine Learning Model. Polymers 2021, 13(19), pp 3297.
5. T. Bress, and D. Dowling, Simulations and Measurements of in-Mold Melt Flow During the Injection Molding of Polystyrene. Polymer Engineering and Science 2013, 53(4).
6. L. Veltmaat, F. Mehrens, H. J. Endres, J. Kuhnet, and P. Suchde, Mesh-free Simulations of Injection Molding Processes, Physics of Fluids 2022, 34, 033102.
7. C. Araujo, D. Pereira, D. Dias, R. Marques, and S. Cruz, In-Cavity Pressure Measurements for Failure Diagnosis in the Injection Moulding Process and Correlation with Numerical Simulation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2023, 126, pp 291-300.
8. M. F. Alzoubi, and M. Abu-Ayyad, Finite Element Model for Controlling the Process of a Mold’s Open/Close in an Injection Molding Machine. Transaction on Control and Mechanical Systems, 2012, 1(6), 264–269.
9. C. Y. Wang, Q. B. Qian, and W.H. Jiang. Design and Simulation of Injection Mold for Mouse Shell Based on Pro/ENGINEER and Moldflow. ANTEC Proceedings 2010 conference, pages 2110-2114.
10. M. Huang, K. C. Ke, and C. Liu, Cavity Pressure-Based Holding Pressure Adjustment for Enhancing the Consistency of Injection Molding Quality. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2020, 138(18), pp 50357.
11. P. C. Xie, X. H. Wang, T. Wu, Y. M. Ding, and W. M. Yang, “Study on Packing Phase Control Based on the Cavity Pressure-Temperature During Injection Molding. International Journal of Polymer Processing 2014. doi.org/10.3139/217.2683
12. M. Baum, F. Jasser, M. Stricker, D. Andres, and S. Lake, “Numerical Simulation of the Filling Process and its Experimental Validation. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2022, 120, pp. 3065-3076.
13. G. Tosello, and F.S. Costa, “High Precision Validation of Micro Injection Molding Process Simulations. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 2019, 48, pp. 236-248.
14. K. Wilcynski, K. J. Wilczynski, and K. Buziak, Modeling and Experimental Studies on Polymer Melting and Flow in Injection Molding. Polymers 2022, 14(10), pp 2106.
15. D. C. Patil, K., N. S. Kelageri, A. Janawade, and M. S. Mishrikoti. Design and Analysis of 25T Injection Molding Machine. Materials Today Proceedings, 2021, 46(7), pp. 2596-2601.
16. F. Marin, A. F. De Souza, R. G. Pabst, and C. H. Ahrens. Influences of the Mesh in the CAE Simulation for Plastic Injection Molding. Polimeros 2019, 29(3), doi 10.1590/0104-1428.05019.
17. S. Zhou, W. Luo, H. Zou, M. Liang, and S. Li, “Enhanced Thermal Conductivity of Polyamide 6/Polypropylene (PA6/PP) Immiscible Blends with High Loadings of Graphite. Journal of Composite Materials 2015, 50(3). doi.org/10.1177/0021998315574