ارزیابی اثر باکتری های محرک رشد بر عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب گندم تحت تاثیرمیزان و روش آبیاری

محورهای موضوعی : مجله علمی- پژوهشی اکوفیزیولوژی گیاهی

اشکان رستمیان ¹ (گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهر قدس، تهران، ایران)
پیام معاونی ² (گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهر قدس، تهران، ایران)
مهدی صادقی شعاع ³ (موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه بذر چغندرقند، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، کرج، ایران)
حمید مظفری ⁴ (گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهر قدس، تهران، ایران)
فائزه رجب زاده ⁵ (گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهر قدس، تهران، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/07/21 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/02/17 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/05/01

کلید واژه: گندم, رژیم آبیاری, کارایی مصرف آب, باکتری های محرک رشد, روش های آبیاری,

چکیده مقاله :

این تحقیق واکنش گندم در برابر تنش‌های مختلف رطوبتی و روش‌های مختلف آبیاری و همچنین عکس‌العمل به باکتری‌های محرک رشد از لحاظ صفات مختلف مربوط به عملکرد و کارایی مصرف آب را طی دو سال زراعی مورد ارزیابی قرار داد. فاکتورهای آزمایش شامل رژیم آبیاری با سه سطح (آبیاری در 40 درصد تخلیه رطوبت قابل دسترس در تمام دوره رشدی(کامل)، آبیاری طبیعی تا گرده افشانی و عدم آبیاری تا 60 درصد تخلیه رطوبت قابل دسترس تا پایان دوره رشدی، آبیاری تا گرده افشانی در 60 درصد تخلیه رطوبت قابل دسترس و قطع آبیاری تا پایان دوره رشدی) روش‌های آبیاری با 5 سطح (نشتی معمول، نشتی یک جویچه در میان متغیر، نشتی یک جویچه در میان ثابت، بارانی و تیپ(نواری-قطره‌ای)) و فاکتور سوم باکتری‌های افزاینده رشد با دو سطح(عدم مصرف و مصرف(تلفیق میکروباکتریوم+ ازتو باکتر+آزوسپریلیوم+ سودوموناس) بودند. نتایج نشان دادند فاکتور رژیم آبیاری بر روی عملکرد بیولوژیک و عملکرد دانه تاثیر معنی داری داشت به طوری که رژیم آبیاری دوم و سوم (به ترتیب با 89/7 و 70/4 تن در هکتار) باعث کاهش عملکرد دانه با کاهش به ترتیب 39/20 و 58/52 درصد شدند. روش‌های مختلف آبیاری بر روی صفات مختلف کمی و کیفی تاثیر‌گذار بود اما در روش آبیاری تیپ بیشترین کارایی مصرف آب را با 00/3 کیلوگرم بر متر مکعب نشان داد. استفاده از تلفیق باکتری باعث افزایش عملکرد بیولوژیک و دانه به ترتیب به میزان 79/9 و 51/13 درصد گردید.

چکیده انگلیسی:

This research evaluated the reaction of wheat against different moisture stresses and different irrigation methods, as well as the reaction to growth-promoting bacteria in terms of different traits related to yield and water use efficiency during two crop years. The experimental factors include the irrigation regime with three levels (irrigation at 40% of available moisture discharge during the entire growth period (normal), normal irrigation until pollination and no irrigation up to 60% of available moisture discharge until the end of the growth period, irrigation until pollination and stop irrigation until the end of the growth period), irrigation methods with 5 levels (regular leakage, leakage of one furrow in the middle of variable, leakage of one furrow in the middle of constant, rain, type (strip-drop)) and the third factor of growth-increasing bacteria with There were two levels (non-use and use (combination of Microbacterium + Azobacter + Azosperlium + Pseudomonas). The results showed that the factor of irrigation regime had a significant effect on biological performance and grain yield, so that the second and third irrigation regimes (respectively with 7.89 and 4.70 tons per hectare) reduced these traits. Different irrigation methods had an effect on different quantitative and qualitative traits, but the most efficient water consumption was achieved in the tip irrigation method with a rate of 3 kg/m3. The use of bacterial integration increased the biological yield and grain to the extent of 9.79 and 13.51 percent.

منابع و مأخذ:

حیدری شریف آباد، ح. 1387. راهبردهای کاهش خشکسالی برای کشاورزی دهمین کنگره علوم زراعی ایران، 18 تا 20 مرداد 1387.SPII، کرج، ایران.

تافته، آ. و ع. ر. سپاسخواه. 1390. تحلیل بهره­وری اقتصادی آب و کود نیتروژن در آبیاری جویچه­ای یک در میان برای کشت کلزا. مجله حفاظت منابع آب و خاک جلد1، صفحات 9-1.

Abdel-Maksoud. H.. H. Sanaa. A. Othman and A. Y. El-Tawil. 2002. Improving water and N-use utilization for field crops via alternate furrow irrigation technique 1-Maize crop. Mansoura University Journal of Agricultural Sciences Mansoura University 27:8761-8769.

Ahire. N. R.. P. G. Bhoi and Solanke. A.V. 2000. Effect of row spacing and planting system on growth and yield of potato under surface and drip irrigation. Journal of the Indian phatato Association. 27.1-2: 59-60.

Bandyopadhyay. K. K.. A. K. Misra. P. K. Ghosh. K. M. Hati. K. G. Mandel and M. Moahnty. 2010. Input use efficiency of wheat under limited water supply in a Vertisol of Central India. Journal of Irrigation Science. 28, 285-299.

Black. C.. B. Erick and C. Ong. 2000. Utilization of light and water in tropical agriculture. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 104:25-47.

Çakmakçi. R.. M. Erat. B. Oral. U. Erdogan and F. Şahin. 2009. Enzyme activities and growth promotion of spinach by indole-3-acetic acid-producing rhizobacteria. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 84: 375–380.

Chakraborty. U.. B. N. Chakraborty. A. P. Chakraborty and P. L. Dey. 2013. Water stress amelioration and plant growth promotion in wheat plants by osmotic stress tolerant bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 29: 789–803.

Chen. R.. W. Cheng. J. Cui. J. Liao. H. Fan. Z. Zheng and F. Ma. 2015. Lateral spacing in drip-irrigated wheat: The effects on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency. Field Crops Research, Volume 179, 1 August 2015, Pages 52–62.

Dobbelaere. S.. A. Croonenborghs. A. Thys. D. Ptacek. J. Vanderleyden and P. Dutto. 2001. Response of agronomically important crops to inoculation with Azospirillum. Aust J Plant Physiol, 28 (2001), pp. 871-879.

East. R. 2013. Microbiome: Soil science comes to life. Nature 50: S18-9.

FAO. 2009. FAOSTAT database. http:/faostat.fao.org.

Ferous. P. and M. Arkosiova. 2001. Variability of chlorophyll conetnt under fluctuating environment, Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, Vol, 4, Special number proceedings of the international scientific conference on the occasion of the 55th anniversary of the slovak agricultural university in nitra.

Gao. X.. M. Lukow and A. Grant. 2012. Grain concentrations of protein, iron and zinc and bread making quality in spring wheat as affected by seeding date and nitrogen fertilizer management. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 121: 36–44.

Gao. Y.. L. Yang. X. Shen. X. Li and J. Sun. 2014. Winter wheat with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI): Crop coefficients, water-use estimates, and effects of SDI on grain yield and water use efficiency. Agricultural Water Management. 146: 1-10.

Gonzalez-Lopez. J.. C. Pozo. M. V. Martinez –Toledo. B. Rodelas and V. Salieeron. 1997. Production of polyhydroxyalkanotes by Azotobacter Chroococcum H23 in wastewater from Olive  Oil Mills. Int. Biodeter. Biodeger., 38: 271-276.

Grabow. G. L.. R. L. Huffman and R. O. Evans. 2011. SDI Dripline Spacing Effect on Corn and Soybean Yield in a Piedmont Clay Soil. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Vol.: 137, No.: 1, January 2011 [Page 27-36].

Grover. M.. S. Z. Ali. V. Sandhya. A. Rasul and B. Venkateswarlu. 2010. Role of microorganisms in adaptation of agriculture crops to abiotic stress. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 27: 1231-1240.

Hao. B.. Q. Xue. T. H. Marek. K. E. Jessup. X. Hou and W. Xu. 2015. Soil water extraction, water use, and grain yield by drought-tolerant maize on the Texas High Plains. Agric. Water Manag. 155, 11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.007.

Islam. F.. T. Yasmeen. Q. Ali. S. Ali. M. S. Arif. S. Hussain and H. Rizvi. 2015. Influence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as PGPR on oxidative stress tolerance in wheat under Zn stress. Ecotoxicol. Environment Saf. 03.008.

Jadhav. A. S.. A. A. Shaikh. C. A. Nimbalkar and G. Harinaray .1987. Synergistic effects of bacterial fertilizers in economizing nitrogen use in peal millet. Millets Newsletter, 8: 14-15.

Jha. K. S.. Y. Gao. H. Liu. Z. H. Huang. G. Wang. Y. Liang and A. Duan. 2017. Root development and water uptake in winter wheat under different irrigation methods and scheduling for North China. Agricultural Water Management. 182: 139-150.

Kaiser. K.. D. Guff and W. Outlaw. 1985. Sugar content of leaves of desiccation-sensitive and desiccation-tolerant plants. Naturzoissenschaften, 72:608-609.

Kang. S. Z.. P. Shi. Y. H. Pan. Z. S. Liang and X. T. Hu. 2000. Soil water distribution, uniformity and water use efficiency under alternate furrow irrigation in arid areas. Irrig. Sci. 19(4): 181-190.

Kasim. W. A.. M. E. Osman. M. N. Omar. I. A. Abd El-Daim. S. Bejai and J. Meijer. 2013. Control of Drought Stress in Wheat Using Plant-Growth- Promoting Bacteria. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 32: 122–130.

Kharrou. M. H.. S. Er-Raki. A. Chehbouni. B. Duchemin. V. Simonneaux. M. LePage. L. Ouzine and L. Jarlan. 2011. Water use efficiency and yield of winter wheat under different irrigation regimes in a semi-arid region. Agricultural Sciences. Vol.2, No.3, 273-282.

Kim. Y. C.. B. Glick. Y. Bashan. and C. M. Ryu. 2013. Enhancement of plant drought tolerance by microbes. In: Aroca R, editor. Plant responses to drought stress. 2013. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Leghari. S. J.. A. A. Soomro. M. G. Laghari. H. K. Talpur. A. F. Soomro and H. M. Mangi. 2018. Effect of NPK rates and irrigation frequencies on the growth and yield performance of Trifolium alexandrium L. AIMS Agric. Food. 3, 397–405. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.397.

Li. J.. X. Xu. G. Lin. Y. Wang. Y. Liu and M. Zhang. 2018. Micro-irrigation improves grain yield and resource use efficiency by co-locating the roots and N-fertilizer distribution of winter wheat in the North China Plain. Sci. Total Environ. 643, 367–377. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.157.

Liao. L.. L. Zhang and L. Bengtsson. 2008. Soil Moisture Variation and Water Consumption of Spring Wheat and their Effects on Crop Yield under Drip Irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage Systems Vol.: 22, No.: 3-4, pp 253.

Liu. X-M. and H. Zhang. 2015. The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Frontiers Plant Science. 6: 1-6, 774.

Lu. Q.. C. Lu. J. Zhang and T. Kuang. 2002. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence during flag leaf senescence of field grown wheat plants. J.  Plant Physiol., 159:1173-1178.

Marasco. R.. E. Rolli. B. Ettoumi. G. Vigani. F. Mapelli. S. Borin. A. F. Abou-Hadid. A. F. El-Behairy. C. Sorlini and A. Cherif. 2012. A drought resistance promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming. 7: 1-14.

Mostafa. H.. R. El-Nady. M. Awad and M. El-Ansary. 2018. Drip irrigation management for wheat under clay soil in arid conditions. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 121, 35-43.

Pandian. B. J.. P. Muthukrishman and S. Rajasekaran. 1992. Efficiency of different irrigation methods and regimes organic matter by cellulolytic fungi. Mycologia 719: 811-820.

Pavia. I.. J. Roque. L. Rocha. H. Ferreira. C. Castro. A. Carvalho. E. Silva. C. Brito. A. Gonçalves. J. Lima-Brito and C. Correia. 2019. Zinc priming and foliar application enhances photoprotection mechanisms in drought-stressed wheat plants during anthesis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 140, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.04.028

Pei. H.. L. Min. Y. Qi. X. Liu. Y. Jia. Y. Shen and C. Liu. 2017. Impacts of varied irrigation on field water budegts and crop yields in the North China Plain: Rainfed vs. irrigated double cropping system. Agric. Water Manag. 2017, 190, 42–54.

Rao. D. L. N. 1986. Nitrogen fixtion in free living and associative symbiotic bacteria.In: soil Micro –organims and plant growth.Subba Rao N. S. (Ed) Oxford and IBH pub. Co., New Dehli

Redman. R. S.. Y. O. Kim. C. J. D. Woodward. C. Greer and L. Espino. 2011. Increased fitness of rice plants to abiotic stress via habitat adapted symbiosis: A strategy for mitigating impacts of climate change. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/.

Sadeghi-Shoae. M.. F. Paknejad. H. Hassanpour Darvishi. H. Mozafari. M. Moharramzadeh and M. R. Tookalloo. 2013. Effect of intermittent furrow irrigation, humic acid and deficit irrigation on water use efficiency of sugar beet. Annals of Biological Research, 4 (3):187-193.

Sadeghi-Shoae. M.. F. Paknejad. B. Shahbazpanahi and M. R. Tookalloo. 2014. Florescence parameters, chlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC) of wheat varieties as affected by different regimes of irrigation. International Journal of Biosciences. Vol.4 (5): 135.

Saleem. M.. A. Wagas and R. N. Ahmad. 2010. Comparison of three wheat varieties with different irrigation systems for water productivity. Int. J. Agric. App. Sci. 2(1): 7-15.

Sanjay Singh. C.. A. Manoj Kumar and N. Rajendra Kumar. 2015. Studies on Water Productivity and Yields Responses of Wheat Based on Drip Irrigation Systems in Clay Loam Soil. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 8(7), 650–654, April 2015.

Si. Zh.. M. Zain. F. Mehmood. G. Wang. Y. Gao and A. Duan. 2020. Effect of nitrogen application rate and irrigation regime on growth, yield, and water-nitrogen use efficiency of drip-irrigated winter wheat in the North China Plain. Journal of Agricultural Water Management. Volume231, 106002.

Singh. S.. D. R. Vir-Komar. M. C. Agarwal. J. L. Mangal. P. Single and K. Komar. 1990.Performance of drip and surface irrigation for water melon in heavy soils.Proceeding of 11th international congress on use of plastics.Agriculture, New Delhi , India 26 February-2 nd March. Netherlands, A.A. Bakema.

Sudhir. U. and S. T. Shende. 1982. Total nitrogen uptake by maize whith Azotobacter inoculation. plant and soil, 69: 275-280.

Swedrzynska. D. and A. Sawicka. 2000. Effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on development and yielding of maize (Zea mays ssp. Saccharata L.) under different cultivation conditions. Polish Journal of Enviromental Studies. pp: 505-509.

Verma. P.. R. Saxena and R. S. Tomar. 2016. Rhizobacteria: A Promising Tool for Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants. Proceeding of International Conference on Recent Advances in Biotechnology (Int-BIONANO-2016).

Wair. B. and C. A. Merced. 2002. Effect of different rates of N and K on drip irrigated Beauregard sweet potatos.

Webber. H. A.. C. A. Madramootoo. M. Bourgault. M. G. Horst. G. Stulina and D. L. Smith. 2006. Water use efficiency of common bean and green gram grown using alternate furrow and deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 86:259-268.

Xu. J.. C. F. Li. Q. F. Meng. J. Z. Ge. P. Wang and M. Zhao. 2015. Effects of different drip-irrigation modes at the seedling stage on yield and water-use efficiency of spring maize in Northeast China. Acta Agron. Sin. 41, 1279–1286. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1006.2015.01279.

Yang. J.. J. W. Kloepper and C. M. Ryu. 2009. Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Science 14: 1–4.

Yang. M.. X. Guan. Y. Liu. J. Cui. C. Ding and J. Wang. 2019. Effects of drip irrigation pattern and water regulation on the accumulation and allocation of dry matter and nitrogen, and water use efficiency in summer maize. Acta Agron. Sin. 45, 443–459. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1006.2019.83026

Zahir. A. Z.. S. A. Abbas. A. Khalid and M. Arshad. 2000. Substrate dependedmicrobially derived plant hormones for improving growth of maize seedlings.Pakistan Journal of Biological Science, 3:289-291.

Zaied. K. A.. A. H. Abd. A. El-Hady. A. H. Sharief. E. H. Ashour and M. A. Nassef. 2007. Effect of Horizontal DNA Transfer in Azospirillum and Azotobacter Strains on Biological and Biochemical Traits of Non-legume Plants. Journal of Applied Sciences Research. 3(1): 73-86.

Zhang. J.. S. Zhang. M. Cheng. H. Jiang. X. Zhang. C. Peng. X. Lu. M. Zhang and J. Jin. 2018. Effect of drought on agronomic traits of rice and wheat: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (5), 839. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050839

Zhang. X.. S. Chen. H. Sun. Y. Wang and L. Shao. 2009. Root size, distribution and soil water depletion as affected by cultivars and environmental factors. Field Crops Res. 114, 75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.07.006.