Developing EOP materials for Pre-service Cabin Crew: A text-driven approach

Subject Areas :

Fatemeh Taghipour ¹ , Ahmad Mohseni ²

1 - Department of Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Foreign Languages, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2020-03-20 Accepted : 2020-10-18 Published : 2021-04-01

Keywords: language proficiency, Cabin crew, EOP, Flight attendants, Materials development,

Abstract :

One prominent criterion to achieve efficient learning and instruction in an educational setting is the appropriate material(s) specifically developed for that particular group of learners, particularly in an English for Occupational Purposes (EOP) context. This study aimed at developing new EOP materials for pre-service cabin crew in an aviation school. To do so, initially the researchers performed the evaluation of the current EOP textbook through a checklist and interviews with 20 English teachers who did not express much satisfaction about it. Consequently, having been convinced about the unsatisfactory results, the researchers developed new materials for this group of learners. The new materials was later implemented on 30 learners as the experimental group as opposed to another 30 as the control group being instructed by the current material. The findings demonstrated significant differences in the experimental group achievement of language proficiency at the end of the course compared to their language proficiency at the beginning of the course. Moreover, the results expressed significant differences between the achievement of control and experimental groups at the end of EOP courses, in favor of the experimental group. The newly developed EOP materials for flight attendants could be widely instructed in the airlines and aviation schools based on the obtained findings.

References:

Alderson, J. C. & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115-129.
Barati, H. (2005). Test-taking strategies and the assessment of reading skills: an approach to construct validation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Bristol. UK.
Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 119-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587008
Cohen, A. D. (2007). On taking language tests: What the students report. Language Testing, 1(1), 70-81.
Cohen, A. D. (2010). Strategies in learning and using a second language. England: Addison Wesley.
Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101-116.https://doi.org/10.1080 /096959499930
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kashkouli, Z., Barati, H., & Nejad Ansari (2015). An investigation into the test-taking strategies employed for a high-stake test: Implications for test validation. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(3), 61-72.
Kırmızı, Ö., & Kömeç, F. (2016). An Investigation of Performance-Based Assessment at High Schools. Üniversitepark Bülten, 5(1-2), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.22521/unibulletin.2016.51
Khoshsima, H, Saed, A., & Mousaei, F (2018). Exploring the Effect of Teaching Test-Taking Strategies on Intermediate Level Learners on Reading Section of Ielts; Learners’ Attitude in Focus. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. 9: 4-9.
Nikneshan, E., Barati, H. (2019). Test-taking Strategies and EFL Learners’ Performance on the Reading Sub-test of Iranian Universities PhD Entrance Exam. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 7 (27): 71-85.
Phakiti, A. (2003). “A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance.” Language Testing, 20 (1): 26-56
Phakiti, A., 2008. Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25(2): 237-249
Purpura, J. (1999). Strategy use and second language test performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Relates to Language Proficiency and Learner Autonomy. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(2): 21-35
Shohamy, E. (1993). The power of test: The impact of language testing on teaching and learning. NFLC Occasional Papers, ED 362-040.
Watanabe, Y. (1996). Does grammar translation come from the entrance examination? Preliminary findings from classroom-based research. Language Testing 13 (3), 318- 333.
Zoubir-Shaw, S., & Oxford, R. (1995). Gender differences in language learning strategy use in university-level introductory French classes: A pilot study employing a strategy questionnaire. In C.A. Klee (Ed.), Faces in a crowd: Individual learners in multisection programs (pp. 181-213). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.