Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes as Potential Adsorbents for Textile Dye Removal-A review

Subject Areas : Journal of Chemical Health Risks

M. Hasanzadeh ^{1 *} , B. Hadavi Moghadam ²

1 - Department of Textile Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 - Department of Textile Engineering, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Received: 2013-08-24 Accepted : 2018-10-29 Published : 2013-06-01

Keywords: Efficiency, wastewater, Electrospinning, Dye removal, Nanofibrous membrane,

Abstract :

Textile wastewaters due to the toxic effects of dyestuffs and other organic compounds and their stability toward light and oxidizing agents have led to an environmental problem. Several treatment methods for dye removal have been investigated. Membrane process is one of the simplest and most effective methods for dye removal from industrial wastewaters. Electrospun nanofibrous membranes have high specific surface area, high porosity, and small pore size. Therefore, they have been suggested as excellent candidates for many applications, especially in wastewater treatment. In this paper, we introduce the fundamental aspects of electrospun nanofibrous membranes and their properties, as well as highlight the enormous potential of nanofibrous membrane as adsorbents for textile dye removal. Finally, characteristic parameters for membrane performance are enumerated. Permeation flux, rejection, membrane porosity, permeability, molecular weight cut off, and decolorization are considered to be the most important ones.

References:

1. Vandevivere P.C., Bianchi R., Verstraete
2. W., 1998. Treatment and reuse of
3. wastewater from the textile wetprocessing
4. industry: review of emerging
5. technologies, J. Chem. Technol. Biot., 72,
6. -302.
7. Robinson T., McMullan G., Marchant R.,
8. Nigam P., 2001. Remediation of dyes in
9. textile effluent: a critical review on
10. current treatment technologies with a
11. proposed alternative, Bioresource.
12. Technol., 77, 247-255.
13. Banat I.M., Nigam P., Singh D.,
14. Marchant R., 1996. Microbial
15. decolourization of textile-dye containing
16. effluents: a review, Bioresource.
17. Technol., 58, 217ââ‚‌“27.
18. Slokar Y.M., Le Marechal A. M., 1998.
19. Methods of decoloration of textile
20. wastewaters, Dyes. Pigments., 37, 335ââ‚‌“
22. Dele´e W., ONeill C., Hawkes F.R.,
23. Pinheiro H.M., 1998. Anaerobic
24. treatment of textile effluents: a review, J.
25. Chem. Technol. Biot., 73, 323ââ‚‌“335.
26. Cooper P., 1993. Removing color from
27. dyehouse waste waters: a critical review
28. of technology available, J. Soc. Dyers.
29. Colorists., 109, 97ââ‚‌“100.
30. Crini G., Robert C., Gimbert F., Martel
31. B., Adam O., De Giorgi F., 2008. The
32. removal of Basic Blue 3 from aqueous
33. solutions by chitosan based adsorbent:
34. batch studies, J. Hazard. Mater., 153,
35. ââ‚‌“106.
36. Dutta, P.K., Bhavani, K.D., Sharma, N.;
37. Adsorption for dyehouse effluent
38. by low cost adsorbent (chitosan), Asian.
39. Text. J., 10, 57ââ‚‌“63.
40. Xu Y., Lebrun R.E., 1999. Treatment of
41. textile dye plant effluent by nanofiltration
42. membrane, Sep. Sci. Technol., 34, 2501ââ‚‌“
44. Bechtold T., Burtscher E., Turcanu A.,
45. Cathodic decolorisation of textile
46. wastewater containing reactive dyes
47. using multi-cathode electrolyser, J.
48. Chem. Technol. Biot., 76, 303ââ‚‌“311.
49. Papic S., Koprivanac N., Bozic A.L.,
50. Metes A., 2004. Removal some reactive
51. dyes from synthetic wastewater by
52. combined Al (III) coagulation/carbon
53. adsorption process, Dyes. Pigments., 62,
54. ââ‚‌“298.
55. Akhtar N., Iqbal J., Iqbal M., 2004.
56. Enhancement of Lead(II) biosorption by
57. microalgal biomass immobilized onto
58. Loofa (Luffa cylindrica) sponge, Eng.
59. Life. Sci., 4, 171ââ‚‌“178.
60. Kahraman S., Asma D., Erdemoglu S.,
61. Yesilada O., 2005. Biosorption of
62. Copper(II) by live and dried biomass of
63. the white rot fungi Phanerochaete
64. chrysosporium and Funalia trogii, Eng.
65. Life. Sci., 5, 72ââ‚‌“77.
66. Marrot B., Roche N., 2002. Wastewater
67. treatment and reuse in textile industries, a
68. review, Res. Adv. In Water Res., 3, 41-53.
69. Aptel P., Buckley C.A., 1996. Categories
70. of membrane operations. in ââ‚‌˜water
71. treatment: membrane processââ‚‌™ (eds.:
72. Mallevialle J., Odendaal P.E. and
73. Winsner M.R.) McGraw-Hill, New York.
74. Ondarçuhu T., Joachim C., 1998.
75. Drawing a single nanofibre over
76. hundreds of microns, Europhys. Lett., 42,
77. ââ‚‌“220.
78. Feng L., Li S., Li Y., Li H., Zhang L.,
79. Zhai J., Song Y., Liu B., Jiang L., Zhu
80. D., 2002. Super-hydrophobic surfaces:
81. from natural to artificial, Adv. Mater., 14,
82. ââ‚‌“1223.
83. Ma P.X., Zhang R., 1999. Synthetic
84. nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix, J.
85. Biomed. Mater. Res., 46, 60ââ‚‌“72.
86. Liu G., Ding J., Qiao L., Guo A., Dymov
87. B.P., Gleeson J.T., Hashimoto T.K., Saijo
88. K., 1999. Polystyrene-block-poly(2-
89. cinnamoyl ethyl methacrylate)
90. nanofibers preparation, characterization,
91. and liquid crystalline properties. Chem-A
92. Eur. J., 5, 2740ââ‚‌“2749.
93. Doshi J., Reneker D.H., 1995.
94. Electrospinning process and applications
95. of electrospun fibers, J. Electrostat., 35,
96. ââ‚‌“160.
97. Shams Nateri A., Hasanzadeh M., 2009.
98. Using fuzzy-logic and neural network
99. techniques to evaluating polyacrylonitrile
100. nanofiber diameter. J. Comput. Theor.
101. Nanosci., 6, 1542-1545.
102. Haghi A.K., Akbari M., 2007. Trends in
103. electrospinning of natural nanofibers.
104. Phys. Status. Solidi. A., 204, 1830-1834.
105. Ziabari M., Mottaghitalab V., Haghi
106. A.K., 2009. A novel approach for
107. analysis of processing parameters in
108. electrospinning of nanofibers. in
109. ââ‚‌˜Nanofibers: fabrication, performance,
110. and applicationsââ‚‌™ (ed. Chang W.N.) Nova
111. Science Publishers, New York.
112. Hadavi Moghadam B., Hasanzadeh M.,
113. Haghi A.K. 2013. On the contact angle of
114. electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber
115. mat. Bulg. Chem. Commun., 45, 169-177.
116. Hasanzadeh M., Hadavi Moghadam B.,
117. Moghadam Abatari M.H., Haghi A.K.,
118. On the production optimization of
119. polyacrylonitrile electrospun nanofiber.
120. Bulg. Chem.Commun., 45, 178-190.
121. Hadavi Moghadam B., Hasanzadeh M.,
122. Predicting contact angle of
123. electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber
124. mat by artificial neural networks and
125. statistical techniques. Adv. Polym. Tech.,
126. doi: 10.1002/adv.21365,
127. Rabbi R., Nasouri K., Bahrambeygi H.,
128. Shoushtari A.M., Babaei M.R., 2012.
129. RSM and ANN approaches for modeling
130. and optimizing of electrospun
131. polyurethane nanofibers morphology.
132. Fiber. Polym., 13, 1007-1014.
133. Sabetzadeh N., Bahrambeygi H., Rabbi
134. A., Nasouri K., 2012. Thermal
135. conductivity of polyacrylonitrile
136. nanofiber web in various nanofiber
137. diameters and surface densities. Micro.
138. Nano. Lett., 7, 662-666.
139. Rošic R., Pelipenko J., Kristl J., Kocbek
140. P., Baumgartner S., 2012. Properties,
141. Engineering and Applications of
142. PolymericNanofibers: Current Research
143. and Future Advances. Chem. Biochem.
144. Eng. Q., 26, 417ââ‚‌“425.
145. Andrady A.L., 2008. Science and
146. technology of polymer nanofibers. Wiley,
147. USA.
148. Brown P.J., Stevens K., 2007. Nanofibers
149. and nanotechnology in textiles.
150. Woodhead, England.
151. Sun Z., Zussman E., Yarin A.L.,
152. Wendorff J.H., Greiner A., 2003.
153. Compound core-shell polymer nanofibers
154. by co-electrospinning, Adv. Mater., 15,
155. -1932.
156. Ramakrishna S., Fujihara K., Teo W.E.,
157. Lim T.C., Ma Z., 2005. An introduction
158. to electrospinning and nanofibers. World
159. scientific, Singapore.
160. Zussman E., Yarin A.L., Bazilevsky
161. A.V., Avrahami R., Feldman M., 2006.
162. Electrospun
163. polyacrylonitrile/poly(methyl
164. methacrylate)-derived turbostratic carbon
165. micro-/nanotubes, Adv. Mater., 18, 348-
167. Nasouri K., Shoushtari A.M., Kaflou A.,
168. Bahrambeygi H., Rabbi A., 2012. Singlewall
169. carbon nanotubes dispersion
170. behavior and its effects on the
171. morphological and mechanical properties
172. of the electrospun nanofibers, Polym.
173. Composite., 33, 1951-1959.
174. Yang S.Y., Taha-Tijerina J., Serrato-Diaz
175. V., Hernandez K., Lozano K., 2007.
176. Dynamic mechanical and thermal
177. analysis of aligned vapor grown carbon
178. nanofiber reinforced polyethylene.
179. Composites B, 38, 228ââ‚‌“235.
180. Bahrambeygi H., Sabetzadeh N., Rabbi
181. A., Nasouri K., Shoushtari A.M., Babaei
182. M.R., 2013. Nanofibers (PU and PAN)
183. and nanoparticles (Nanoclay and
184. MWNTs) simultaneous effects on
185. polyurethane foam sound absorption. J.
186. Polym. Res., 20, 1-10.
187. Al-Saleh M.H., Sundararaj U., 2011.
188. Review of the mechanical properties of
189. carbon nanofiber/polymer composites.
190. Composites A, 42, 2126-2142.
191. Moridi Z., Mottaghitalab V., Haghi A.K.,
192. A Detailed Review of Recent
193. Progress in Carbon Nanotube/Chitosan
194. Nanocomposites. Cellulose Chem
195. Technol, 45, 549-563.
196. Han L.F., Xu Z.L., Yu L.Y., Wei Y.M.,
197. Cao Y., 2010. Performance of
198. PVDF/multi-nanoparticles composite
199. hollow fibre ultrafiltration membranes,
200. Iran. Polym. J., 19, 553-565.
201. Boerlage S. F. E., 2001. Scaling and
202. particulate fouling in membrane filtration
203. systems. Swets & Zeitlinger Publisher,
204. Lisse.
205. McDonald R., 1997. Colour physics for
206. industry. Society of Dyers and
207. Colourists, London.
208. Dorthy C.A.M., Sivaraj R., Venckatesh
209. R., 2012. Decolorization of reactive
210. violet ââ‚‌“ 2RL dye by aspergillus flavus
211. and aspergillus fumigatus from textile
212. sludge, Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 1, 8-12