Structural Equation Modelling of the Relationship Between EFL Learners'''' Language Mindset and Individual Attributes: The Case of Self-efficacy, Autonomy, Critical Thinking
محورهای موضوعی : Research PaperSamira Soltani 1 , Fariba Rahimi Esfahani 2 , Sajad Shafiee 3
1 - English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
2 - English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
3 - English Department, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran
کلید واژه: Self-efficacy, critical thinking, Language Mindset, Learner''s Autonomy,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed at exploring a host of objectives: it examined whether self-efficacy, learner autonomy, and critical thinking play a significant part in predicting EFL learners'' language mindset. Moreover, it inspected the direct and indirect relationships among all the above-mentioned variables. To achieve these purposes, a correlational survey design was used; survey questionnaires (Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), Learner Autonomy Questionnaire, California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST), and Language Mindsets Inventory (LMI) were administered to more than 700 male and female intermediate EFL learners selected through convenient sampling from several language institutes in Isfahan, Iran, and the required data were collected and statistically analyzed by path analysis in the SmartPLS environment. The obtained results showed that all the variables are partially related to language mindset. However, the significant relationship with mindset was that of self-efficacy. This finding has useful implications for language teachers. Growth mindsets must be captured and modeled by them for the proper implementation of mindset interventions so that learners can understand their flexible capacities as a reflection of their efforts. They can also develop attitudes and behaviors in the learner that will help them succeed in life. Learners who undergo a growth mindset intervention to increase self-efficacy will benefit from greater academic success and commitment to learning.
This study aimed at exploring a host of objectives: it examined whether self-efficacy, learner autonomy, and critical thinking play a significant part in predicting EFL learners'' language mindset. Moreover, it inspected the direct and indirect relationships among all the above-mentioned variables. To achieve these purposes, a correlational survey design was used; survey questionnaires (Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), Learner Autonomy Questionnaire, California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST), and Language Mindsets Inventory (LMI) were administered to more than 700 male and female intermediate EFL learners selected through convenient sampling from several language institutes in Isfahan, Iran, and the required data were collected and statistically analyzed by path analysis in the SmartPLS environment. The obtained results showed that all the variables are partially related to language mindset. However, the significant relationship with mindset was that of self-efficacy. This finding has useful implications for language teachers. Growth mindsets must be captured and modeled by them for the proper implementation of mindset interventions so that learners can understand their flexible capacities as a reflection of their efforts. They can also develop attitudes and behaviors in the learner that will help them succeed in life. Learners who undergo a growth mindset intervention to increase self-efficacy will benefit from greater academic success and commitment to learning.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4, 359–373.
International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 11 (47), 2023 Islamic Azad University of Najafabad
Structural Equation Modelling of the Relationship Between EFL … 83
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
Benson, P., (2001), Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow, England: Longman.
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy (2nd ed.). London, England: Pearson Education.
Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and Teaching Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Dickinson, L. (1992). Learner Autonomy 2: Learner Training for Language Learning.
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical thinking framework for any discipline. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160-166.
Dweck, C., & Master, A. (2009). Self-theories motivate self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 31–51). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Dweck, C. (2019). The Choice to Make a Difference. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 14(1), 21–25. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1745691618804180.
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi. org/10.1177/ 17456 9161 8804 166.
Emerson, M. K. (2007). A Model for Teaching Critical Thinking. Online Submission.
Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). ERIC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED315423
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. (2017). The Origins of Children''s Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal. Child development. 88. 10.1111/cdev.12955.
Kaya, D., & Bozdağ, H.C. (2016). Resources of Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Perception of Science Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Academic Achievement. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 18. 438-451. 10.13187/ejced.2016.18.438.
Khajavi, M., Hajimoradloo, A., Zandi, M., Pezeshki-Modaress, M., Bonakdar, Sh.,& Zamani, A. (2021). Fish cartilage: A promising source of biomaterial for biological scaffold fabrication in cartilage tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 109. 10.1002/jbm.a.37169.
Kim, D.-H., Lee, H., & Kwak, J. (2017) Standards as a driving force that influences emerging technological trajectories in the converging world of the Internet and things: An investigation of the M2M/IoT patent network. Research Policy, 46(7), pp. 1234-1254. (doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.008)
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik Language Learning Resources.
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2016). Changing language mindsets: Implications for goal orientations and responses to failure in and outside the second language classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 22–33. http:/ /dx. doi. Org /10. 1016 /j. cedpsych.2016.03.004
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2017). Measuring language mindsets and modeling their relations with goal orientations and emotional and behavioral responses in failure situations. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 214–243. http s://doi. org/10.1 111/modl.12380.
International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 11 (47), 2023 Islamic Azad University of Najafabad
84 Soltani, S., Rahimi, F., & Shafiee, S., Vol. 11, Issue 47, 2023, pp. 71-85
Lou, N. M., & Noels, K. A. (2020). Breaking the vicious cycle of language anxiety: Growth language mindsets improve lower-competence ESL students’ intercultural interactions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–17. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101847
Pennycook, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy. In P. Benson and P. Voller (Eds), Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning. London: Longman.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1991). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40
Sadeghi, F., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, M. S. (2020). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ language mindset with goal orientation and responses to failure. Cogent Education, 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1833814.
Taghinejad, H., Suhrabi, Z., Kikhavani, S.R., Jaafarpour, M., & Azadi, A. (2014). Occupational Mental Health: A Study of Work-Related Mental Health among Clinical Nurses. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 8. WC01-3. 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8247.4835.
Teimouri, Y. & Goetze, J. & Plonsky, L. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1-25. 10.1017/S0272263118000311
Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11).
Vaghei, Sh., Rahimi Esfahani, F., & Shafiee, S. (2021). L2 writing feedback preferences and their relationships with entity vs. incremental mindsets of EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(34), 119-134.
Yang, R., & Priyadarshini, M. (2019). Growth mindset and students’ perception of their English language teachers’ feedback as predictors of language proficiency of the EFL learners. Asian EFL Journal, 23(3), 32–60.
Yilmaz S., M., Zeleny, M., Zhao, R., Dempsey, M., & Kauffman, D. (2017). Secondary Students’ Writing Achievement Goals: Assessing the Mediating Effects of Mastery and Performance Goals on Writing Self-Efficacy, Affect, and Writing Achievement.
Zarrinabadi, N., Lou, N. M., & Shirzad, M. (2021). Autonomy support predicts language mindsets: Implications for developing communicative competence and willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms. Learning and Individual Differences, 86, 101981.
Zhang, L. X., & Li X. X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and West European students. Foreign Language World, 4, 15-23.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attainment of self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation, research, and applications. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
