Evaluating the Efficiency of In-Service Programs on Iranian EFL Teachers’ Knowledge Base: A Delphi Study
محورهای موضوعی : language teaching
مریم محمودی
1
,
مژگان رشتچی
2
,
غلامرضا عباسیان
3
1 - Ph.D., Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Literature, Humanities, and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, TEFL Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Associate Professor, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Delphi Study, Pedagogical Knowledge, Knowledge base, Content Knowledge, in-service education and training (INSET), high school English teachers, technological pedagogical,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study investigated high school English language teachers’ perspectives on the usefulness of In-service Education and Training (INSET) classes on their Knowledge Base (KB). Three rounds of the Delphi study were designed: one qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and two quantitative ones. Twenty-nine teachers were selected based on purposive sampling. The criterion for sample selection was teachers’ participation in the INSET classes held by the Education and Training Organization of Guilan Province. The teachers were familiar with the Prospects and Vision textbook series and agreed to participate in the study. After conducting semi-structured interviews, common issues related to the teachers’ KB were extracted using MAXQDA version 12. Then, based on EFL teachers’ responses to the interview questions in the first Round (R1), the second Round (R2) was conducted, resulting in the development of a 27-item questionnaire on a five-point Likert-type scale addressing teachers’ KB to which the participants responded. The third Round (R3) was performed with the same questionnaire and participants to verify their views stated in R2. Paired samples t-tests were used to analyze the data in R2 and R3. The results showed conformity among teachers’ responses to the interviews and R2 and R3 questions. Teachers expected the classes to be more practical, focusing on step-by-step instruction and planning to enhance their pedagogical, technological, and content knowledge bases. The findings suggest that appropriate INSET programs need to be developed and implemented to promote teachers’ quality of practice and, thus, students’ learning.
پژوهش حاضر به بررسی نظرات معلمان زبان انگلیسی در مورد کآرآمدی کلاس‌های ضمن خدمت (INSET) بر پایگاه دانش (KB) معلمان زبان انگلیسی در مقطع دبیرستان پرداخت. برای انجام این پژوهش، از سه بار مطالعه دلفی (روش ترکیبی) استفاده شد. بار اول مطالعه کیفی با استفاده از مصاحبه نیمه ساختاری انجام شد و بارهای دوم و سوم مطالعه کمی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. آزمودنی‌ها 29 معلم زبان انگلیسی از استان گیلان بودند که به روش نمونه گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده بودند. معیار انتخاب معلمان شرکت در کلاس های ضمن خدمت و آشنایی با کتاب های درسی Prospect و Vision بود. از طریق مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند، دیدگاه‌های آنان در مورد کلاس‌های ضمن خدمت جمع اوری شد و با استفاده از نرم افزار MAXQDA مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. سپس بر اساس ایده های معلمان پرسشنامه ای با 27 سوال تهیه شد وتوسط معلمان دوبار پاسخ داده شد. بررسی نتایج با استفاده ازآزمون های جفت شده تی (T-Test) نشان‌داد نظرات معلمان تغییرمعنادار نداشته است. معلمان انتظار داشتند که آموزش در کلاس‌ها دقیق‌تر انجام شود و برنامه ریزی برای افزایش دانش محتوایی، دانش آموزشی و دانش تکنولوژیکی آنها باشد. آزمودنی-ها پیشنهادهایی برای بهبود اجرای برنامه‌های ضمن خدمت در جهت ارتقای کیفیت آموزش معلمان دادند که می‌تواند به یادگیری دانش‌آموزان منتهی شود.
Aharony, N., & Bronstein, J. (2013). A Delphi investigation into the future of e-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 911–914. http://dx.doi.org/110.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.170
Al Ofi, A.H. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of continuous professional development programs for English language teachers. International Journal of Education and Research, 10 (2), 89–106.
Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
Banegas, D. L. (2009). Content knowledge in teacher education: Where professionalization lies, ELTED, 12, 44–51.
Brad, R. S. (2015). Utilizing and adapting the Delphi method for use in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,1 (6), 56–67. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1609406915621381 ijqm.sagepub.com
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36 (2), 81–106. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0261444803001903.
Brewer, E. W. (2011). Evaluation models for evaluating educational programs. In V.C.X. Wang (Ed). Assessing and evaluating adult learning in career and technical education (pp.129–153). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing, Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.
Cimer, S. O., Cakir, I., & Cimer, A. (2010). Teachers’ views on the effectiveness of in‐service courses on the new curriculum in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760903506689
Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17, 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401
Coskun, A., & Daloglu, A. (2010). Evaluating an English language teacher education program through Peacock’s model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 24–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n6.2
Cox, S., & Graham, C.R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using and elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. Tech Trends, 53, 60–69.
Ertmer, P.A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective, PIQ,26 (2), 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21143
Ersanli, C. Y. (2016). Improving technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service English language teachers. International Education Studies, 9 (5), 18-27. http://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p18
Fan, C.K., & Cheng, A. (2006). Study to identify the training needs of life insurance sales representatives in Taiwan using the Delphi approach, International. Journal of Training. 10, 212–226.
Green, R. A. (2014). The Delphi technique in educational research, SAGE, 1(4), 1–8.
http://doi.og/ 10.1177/2158244014529773.
Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., & Izadyar, S, (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering And Science, 3(4), 8-13.
Habibi, A., Firouzi Jahantigh, F., & Sarafrazic, A. (2015). Fuzzy Delphi technique for forecasting and screening items. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 5 (2), 130–143.
http://doi.org/10.5958/2249 7307.2015.00036.5
Hashemian, M., & Azadi, Gh. (2014). EFL teachers’ understanding of the teaching portions of INSET programs. RALs, 5(1), 62–76.
Hung, B. P. (2016). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary school teachers of English in Vietnam. International Journal of English Linguistics, 6 (4), 96–103. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n4p96
Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for science education: Implications of a teacher trainers’ preparation program. Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE), 597-607.
Kiely, R., & Rea-Dickins, P. (2009). Evaluation and learning in language programmes. In K. Knapp., B. Seidlh., & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), Handbook of language communication and learning (pp. 663–694). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kim, H., Choi, H., Han, J., & So, H. (2012). Enhancing teachers’ ICT capacity for the 21st century learning environment: Three cases of teacher education in Korea. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 965–982. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.805
Khanjani, A., Vahdani, F., Jafarigohar, M. (2017). EFL teacher education in Iran: Does it promote trainers’ pedagogical content knowledge? Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 159–186.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Akcaoglu, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2013). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for teachers and teacher educators. In R. Thyagarajan (Ed.), ICT integrated teacher education: A resource book (pp. 2-7). New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia.
Liu, S., Liu, H., Yu, Y., Li, Y., & Wen, T. (2014). TPACK: A new dimension to EFL teachers’ PCK. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(2), 681–693.
Llosa, L., & Slayton, J. (2009). Using program evaluation to inform and improve the education of young English language learners in US schools. Language Teaching Research, 13(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808095522
Mahmoodi, M., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, Gh. (2019). Evaluation of In-service teacher training program in Iran: Focus on the Kirkpatrick model, Education and Self Development, 14(4), 20–38. http://doi.org/10.26907/esd14.4.03
Mahmoudi, M., Rashtchi, M., & Abbasian, Gh. (2021). Efficacy of In-service education and training (INSET) courses in improving EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK), Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(1), 31-54.
Mcintyre-Hite, L. (2016). A Delphi study of effective practices for developing competency-based learning models in higher education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1, 157–166. http://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1029
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Mouza, C., & Wong, W. (2009). Studying classroom practice: Case development for professional learning in technology integration. Journal Technology &Teacher Education, 17(2), 175–201. Retrieved September 15, 2022, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/26963/.
Oliveira, L. C. (2015). A model of teaching knowledge for nonnative English- speaking teachers. EntreLínguas, Araraquara, 1(1), 11–23.
Önal, A. (2019). An exploratory study on pre-service teachers’ reflective reports of their video-recorded microteaching. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(3), 806–830. http://dx.doi.org/10.17263/jlls.631520
Pawlak, M. (2011). The role of in-service training for language teachers in the domain of language competence. GLOTTODIDACTICA, An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38(1) 21–30.
Peacock, M. (2009). The evaluation of foreign-language-teacher education programs. Language Teaching Research, 13 (3), 259–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809104698
Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training: Perspectives on language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Rodwell, M. K. (1998). Social work constructivist research. New York, NY: Garland.
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (2011). The Delphi technique: Past, present, and future prospects – introduction to the special issue. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 1487–1490. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002
Sahragard, R., & Saberi, L. (2018). The knowledge base of pre-service and in-service Iranian EFL teachers in teacher education programs. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 445–466.
Schulman, L.S. (1986). Educational researcher. American Educational Research Association, 15(2), 4–14.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for pre- service teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
Somerville, J. A. (2008). Effective use of the Delphi process in research: Its characteristics, strengths, and limitations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University], Corvallis, OR.
Tarone, E., & Allwright, D. (2005). Second language teacher learning and student second language learning: Shaping the knowledge base. In D. J. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education international perspective (pp. 5-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. (1996). Computer based Delphi processes. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi technique and its application to social policy and public health. London: Kingsley.
Uysal, H. H. (2012). Evaluation of an in-service training program for primary school language teachers in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 14–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n7.4
