The Power of Aural and Picture Vocabulary Size Test in Predicting Iranian EFL Learners’ Viewing Comprehension
محورهای موضوعی : English Language Teaching (ELT)سید محمدرضا امیریان 1 , سعید غنی آبادی 2 , مهلا قلیچی 3
1 - دانشکده زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری، سبزوار، ایران
2 - دانشکده زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی،دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری،سبزوار، ایران
3 - دانشکده زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی،دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری،سبزوار، ایران
کلید واژه: EFL learners, viewing comprehension, aural vocabulary size, picture vocabulary size, video,
چکیده مقاله :
The aim of this investigation has been to predict Viewing Comprehension through Aural and Picture Vocabulary Size among Iranian EFL Learners. To this end, 110 intermediate students were selected from two institutes of a city in Khorasan Razavi province, Iran. Pictorial vocabulary knowledge of learners was tested by Picture Vocabulary Size Test, Aural vocabulary knowledge was measured by Aural vocabulary size test and viewing comprehension was tested by a multiple-choice question test. All analyses were carried out using SPSS for Microsoft windows 22. Pearson product moment correlation analysis was run to analyze the relationship among viewing comprehension, picture vocabulary size and aural vocabulary. After the correlation analysis, we did step-wise multiple regression analysis to predict an outcome variable from two predictors. Interestingly, it was found that both picture and aural vocabulary size have a significant positive correlation with viewing comprehension. It was also proved that only aural vocabulary size can be considered as a significant predictor of EFL learners' viewing comprehension ability.
هدف اصلی این مطالعه پیش بینی میزان توانایی درک مطلب از طریق اندازه واژگان صوتی و تصویری در زبان آموزان ایرانی بود. برای انجام این مطالعه ,110 زبان آموز سطح متوسط از دو موسسه واقع در شهر درگز خراسان رضوی انتخاب شدند.چهار ابزار از جمله ,آزمون جایگذاری سریع آکسفورد QOPT)) , آزمون اندازه واژگان تصویر،آزمون واژگان شنیداری و تست درک مطلب در یک جلسه اجرا شد. دانش واژگان تصویری فراگیران با آزمون اندازه واژگان تصویری، دانش واژگان شنیداری با آزمون اندازه واژگان شنیداری و درک مطلب با آزمون چهارگزینه ای اندازه گیری شد. . داده های جمع آوری شده با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. از روش آلفای کرونباخ و تحلیل همبستگی پیرسون برای تجزیه و تحلیل رابطه بین درک مطلب، اندازه واژگان تصویر و واژگان شنیداری بهره گرفته شد. پس از تجزیه و تحلیل همبستگی، ما به طور گام به گام تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه را برای پیش بینی یک متغیر مستقل از دو متغیر پیش بینی کننده انجام دادیم. بطور جالب یافته ها حاکی از آن بود که هر دوی اندازه واژگان تصویری و صوتی همبستگی مثبت و معناداری با توانایی درک مطلب دیداری زبان اموزان داشتند. همچنین اثبات شد که فقط اندازه واژگان تصویری می تواند بعنوان پیش بینی کننده توانایی درک مطلب دیداری زبان آموزان در نظر گرفته شود.
Afshari, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2017). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and Iranian EFL learners’ listening comprehension. International Journal, 6(3), 13-24.
Al-Seghayer, K. (2016). Celebrating the Story of my First Contribution to CALL. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 179-184.
Amirian, S. M. R., Mallahi, O., & Zaghi, D. (2015). The relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ self-regulatory vocabulary strategy use and their vocabulary size. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(2), 29-46.
Baltova, I. (1999). The effect of subtitled and staged video input on the learning and retention of content and vocabulary in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Chapple, L., & Curtis, A. (2000). Content-based instruction in Hong Kong: Student responses to film. System, 28(3), 419-433.
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills: Theory and practice. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.
Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dualroute models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
Davies, P., & Pears, E. (2003). Success in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Durbahn, M., Rodgers, M., & Peters, E. (2020). The relationship between vocabularyk2 and viewing comprehension, System,88. 21-36.
Ekwall, E., Shanker, J., 1998. Locating and correcting reading difficulties. Merrill, Columbus, OH.
Ha, H. T. (2021). Exploring the relationships between various dimensions of receptive vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading comprehension. Lang Test Asia, 11(20). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00131-8
Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English language teaching. Second Edition. London: Longman.
Hazenberg, S., & Hulstun, J. H. (1996). Defining a minimal receptive second-language vocabulary for non-native university students: An empirical investigation. Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 145-163.
Hornby. A.S. (2000). Oxford advanced learners of current English. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2011). Children's reading comprehension difficulties: Nature, causes, and treatments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 139-142.
Janebi Enayat, M., Amirian, S. M. R., Zareian, G., & Ghaniabadi, S. (2018). Reliable measure of written receptive vocabulary size: Using the L2 depth of vocabulary knowledge as a yardstick. SAGE Open, 8(1), 2158244017752221.
Janebi Enayat, M., Amirian, S. M. R. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary size and depth for Iranian EFL learners at different language proficiency levels. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 97-114.
Kang, Y., Kang, H. S., & Park, J. (2012). Is it vocabulary breadth or depth that better predict Korean EFL learners' reading comprehension? English Teaching, 67(4).
Laufer, B. (1997). The lexical plight in second language reading: words you don’t know, words you think you know and words you can’t guess. In J. Coady, & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 20- 34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manihuruk, D. H. (2020). The Correlation between EFL Students’ Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 6(1), 86-95.
Mart, C. T. (2012). Encouraging young learners to learn English through stories. English Language Teaching, 5(5), 101-106.
Masrai, A. (2019). Exploring the impact of individual differences in aural vocabulary knowledge, written vocabulary knowledge and working memory capacity on explaining L2 learners’ listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2018-0106
Matthews, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System, 52, 1-13.
Matthews, J. (2018). Vocabulary for listening: emerging evidence for high and mid-frequency vocabulary knowledge. System, 72, 23-36.
Mayer, R.E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mehrpour, S., Razmjoo, S. A., & Kian, P. (2011). The relationship between depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 2(222), 97-127.
Michas, I. C., & Berry, D. C. (2000). Learning a procedural task: effectiveness of multimedia presentations. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14(6), 555-575.
Miller, G. A. (1991). The science of words. New York: Scientific American Library.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition (Vol. 45). Multilingual Matters.
Milton, J., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Aural lex. Swansea, Wales: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University College Swansea.
Milton, J., Wade, J., & Hopkins, N. (2010). Aural word recognition and oral competence in a foreign language. In R. Chacon-Beltran, C. Abello-Contesse, M. Torreblanca-Lopez, & M. Lopez-Jimenez (Eds.), Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning (pp. 83-97). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Mizumoto, A., & Shimamoto, T. (2008). A comparison of aural and written vocabulary size of Japanese EFL university learners. Language Education & Technology, 45, 35-51.
Moghadam, S. H., Zainal, Z. & Ghaderpour, M. (2012). A review on the important role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension performance. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 66, 555-563.
Moinzadeh, A., & Moslehpour, R. (2012). Depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge: Which really matters in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners? Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.5.1015-1026
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 6-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neuman, S. B., & Dwyer, J. (2009). Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in pre-k. The Reading Teacher, 62(5), 384-392.
Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. S. (1992). Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning in context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 95-106.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peters, E. (2019). The effect of imagery and on‐screen text on foreign language vocabulary learning from audiovisual input. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 1008-1032.
Pujadas Jorba, G., & Muñoz Lahoz, C. (2020). Examining adolescent EFL learners' TV viewing comprehension through captions and subtitles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-25.
Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282-308.
Rayhana. M., & Minalang-Limbona (2018). Effects of viewing video materials with intervention to the viewing comprehension and vocabulary of grade four pupils of MSU-ILS. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(3), 54-69.
Reed, S. K. (2010). Cognition: Theories and application (8th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Renandya, W. A., & Richards, J. C. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rieber, L.P. (1994). Computers, graphics, and learning. Madison, Wisconsin: Brown & Benchmark.
Rodgers, M. P. H. (2018). The images in television programs and the potential for learning unknown words: The relationship between on-screen imagery and vocabulary. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169, 192-213.
Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schonell, F. J., Meddleton, I. G. & Shaw, B. A. (1956). A study of the oral vocabulary of adults. Brisbane. University of Queensland Press.
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(2), 217-234.
Wen, C. (1989). Student attitudes during a course with and without TV in the language laboratory. Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 26, 238-250.
Woottipong, K. (2014). Effect of using video materials in the teaching of listening skills for university students. International Journal of Linguistics, 6(4), 200.
Zhang, S., & Zhang, X. (2020). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading/listening comprehension: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168820913998
Zimmerman, C. B. (1997). Do reading and interactive vocabulary instruction make a difference? An empirical study. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 121–139.
Zimmerman, K. J. (2005). Newly placed versus continuing students: comparing vocabulary size. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 52 - 60.
