Discontinuous Residue and Theme in Higher-Order Semiotic: A Case for Interlocking Systems
محورهای موضوعی : English Language Teaching (ELT)
علی اکبر فراهانی
1
,
یاسر حدیدی
2
1 - University of Tehran
2 - University of Tehran
کلید واژه: theme, Discontinuous Residue, Higher-order semiotic, Systemic-Functional Grammar, Synergistic Simultaneity,
چکیده مقاله :
The fallacy persists in discourse analysis research to explore lexicogrammatical phenomena detached from any adjacent plane of the meaning potential. In an attempt to dispel this and toss out some preconceived notions about what a modern SFG vantage point should involve, this study homes in on one aspect of SFG within prose fiction in particular, which is very revealing in terms of how separate system networks are actually in synergistic simultaneity, and how SFG allows one , phenomenally well, to bring such synergies out, getting to the heart of the fact that language pervasively operates on multiple planes of textuality simultaneously. Thus, building upon Halliday’s 2004 work, the quest is if it is interpersonally significant when the Residue is split into two parts; more importantly, if it is also laced with some lexicogrammatical quality on the textual plane, in light of the fairly well-entrenched assumption that there is always Theme at work when the Residue is split. Halliday is the only scholar to touch upon the topic of Discontinuous Residue and its relationship to Marked Theme in the culmination of his groundbreaking career, i.e. his 2004 work. Having driven home the proposal to make into a watchword the ubiquity of interlocking macro-semantic system networks, some pedagogical and research implications and suggestions flowing from this are brought up.
این تحقیق در نظر دارد پتانسیلها و قابلینهای تئوری زبانشناختی نحوی کاربردی را با نشان دادن رابطه بین باقیمانده معنایی قطع شده و اجزای نخستین جمله نشان دهد. این تئوری نگاهی به زبان است که ابزار تحلیلی فراوانی برای نشان دادن پتانسیلها و قابلیتهای عمیق خود در اختیار دارد. این ابزار تحلیلی به محقق نگاهی تیزبینانه و عمیق میدهد تا بتواند انواع کلام و متون را مورد مطالعه قرار داده و جنبه های مختلف آنها را در زندگی واقعی نشان دهد و به نظم در آورد. این مطالعه نشان میدهد که سیستمهای معنایی در ظاهر جدا با یکدیگر ارتباطهای چندگانه و همزمان دارند و زبان کلام نثر تخیلی بدینگونه تشکیل میشود. وقتی چیدمان معمولی معنا در جمله تغییر میکند یا به هم میخورد , اجزایی به اول جمله میایند که در معنای کلامی جمله تغییر اساسی ایجاد میکنند و برای محققان و زبان آموزان انگلیسی مفاهیم و اهمیت بسزایی دارند.
Carter, R., Goddard, A., Reah, D., Sanger, K. & Bowring, M . (2001). Working with texts: A core introduction to language analysis. London: Routledge.
Collie, J. & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eggins, S. (1994).An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Continuum.
Fries, H. P. (2002). The flow of information in a written English text. In H.P. Fries, M. Cummings, D. Lockwood, and W. Spruiell, (eds), Relations and functions within and around language. pp. 117-156.London: Continuum.
Fries, H.P. (1994). On Theme, rheme, and discourse goals. In M. Coulthard, (ed), Advances in written discourse analysis. pp. 229-250. London: Routledge.
Ghadessy, M. (1995). Thematic development in English text. London: Pinter.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999).Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Knowles, M. & Moon, R. (2006).Introducing metaphor. London: Routledge.
Long, M. (1986). A Feeling for Language: The Multiple Values of Teaching Literature. In C.J. Brumfit, and R.A. Carter, (Eds), Literature and language teaching. pp. 67-89 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lotfipour –Saedi , K. (2006). Towards the textuality of a text: A grammar for communication. Tabriz: Foruzesh.
Martin , J. R. , Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. , & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. & Halliday, M.A.K. (1997). Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Internet Document at ‘http : // minerva. ling. mq. edu. au/ . Retrieved 2005/12/25.
McKay, S.L. (2001). Literature as content for ESL/EFL. In M. Celce-Murcia, (ed), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. pp. 319-330. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Morley, D.G. (2000). Syntax in functional grammar: An introduction to lexicogrammar in systemic linguistics. London: Continuum.
Thompson, G. (2004).Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Ventola, E. (1988). Text analysis in operation: a multilevel approach. In R.P. Fawcett, and D. Young, (Eds), New developments in systemic linguistics. pp. 52-75. London: Pinter.
