The Effect of Graphic Organizer Strategy on Improving Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Complexity of Written Performance
محورهای موضوعی : language teachingمریم حسن پور 1 , فاطمه میرزاپور 2
1 - Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 - دانشکده زبان انگلیسی. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد صوفیان
کلید واژه: EFL learners, Complexity, writing performance, graphic organizer,
چکیده مقاله :
Writing by which students can be assessed plays an important function in the education process. By considering this fact, investigating the impact of graphic organizer strategy on improving Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ complexity of written performance was the main goal of this study. 40 intermediate EFL learners were selected as the participants of the study on the basis of findings of Preliminary English Test. After that, they were randomly divided into two experimental and control groups. To assess the initial writing ability of participants, two groups were given a pre-test prior to the treatment. After applying traditional method to the control group and the graphic organizer strategies to the experimental group, both groups received a post-test to examine the effect of materials. To examine the effectiveness of the treatment, an independent samples t-test was conducted. To see the progression amount between pre-test and post-test of the experimental group, a paired samples t-test was also employed. The findings of the study indicated that graphic organizer strategies improved the learners’ complexity of written performance. The results have some implications for EFL/ESL teachers, students, test and materials developers, and syllabus designers.
Writing by which students can be assessed plays an important function in the education process. By considering this fact, investigating the impact of graphic organizer strategy on improving Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ complexity of written performance was the main goal of this study. 40 intermediate EFL learners were selected as the participants of the study on the basis of findings of Preliminary English Test. After that, they were randomly divided into two experimental and control groups. To assess the initial writing ability of participants, two groups were given a pre-test prior to the treatment. After applying traditional method to the control group and the graphic organizer strategies to the experimental group, both groups received a post-test to examine the effect of materials. To examine the effectiveness of the treatment, an independent samples t-test was conducted. To see the progression amount between pre-test and post-test of the experimental group, a paired samples t-test was also employed. The findings of the study indicated that graphic organizer strategies improved the learners’ complexity of written performance. The results have some implications for EFL/ESL teachers, students, test and materials developers, and syllabus designers.
Aliakbari, M., & Monfared, M. (2014). Iranian students’ beliefs and motivations towards English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(23), 200-206.
Alber-Morgan, S. R., Hessler, T., & Konrad, M. (2007). Teaching writing for keeps. Education and treatment of children, 107-128.
Amin, A. (2004). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. Reading economic geography, 48-58.
Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological review, 85(4), 249-277.
Baxendell, B. W. (2003). Consistent, coherent, creative: The 3 C's of graphic organizers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(3), 46-55.
Blair, T. R., Dee Nichols, W., Rupley, W. H., & Wood, K. D. (2008). Vocabulary strategies for linguistically diverse learners. Middle School Journal, 39(3), 65-69.
Bloomfield, L. (2004). The importance of writing. Originally published on the Commentary Page of the Philadelphia Inquirer on Sunday/Еd J. Timpane.–April, 4.
Boulineau, T., Fore III, C., Hagan-Burke, S., & Burke, M. D. (2004). Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(2), 105-121.
Casteleyn, J., Mottart, A., & Valcke, M. (2013). The impact of graphic organizers on learning from presentations. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 283-301.
Chiang, C. (2005). The effects of graphic organizers on Taiwnese tertiary students' EFL reading comprehension and attitudes towards reading in English. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).Australian Catholic University, Urban, Australia.
Ching, L. & Chee, T. (2010). Scaffolding writing using feedback in students' graphic organizers: Novice writers' relevance of idea and cognitive load. Educational Media International, 47(2)135-152.
Chmielewski, T. C., & Dansereau, D. F. (1998). Enhancing the recall of text: Knowledge training promotes implicit transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 407-454.
Chung, J. S. (2000). Signals and reading comprehension—theory and practice. System, 28(2), 247-259.
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of educational psychology, 99(2), 3-11.
Darch, C. & Eves, C.R. ( 1986). Visual Displays to Increase Comprehension of High School Learning-Disabled Students. Journal of Special Education, 20 (3). 309-318.
Egan, J. (1999). Authorizing Experience: Refigurations of the Body Politic in Seventeenth-Century New England Writing. Princeton University Press.
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in second Language acquisition, 26(1), 59-84.
Evmenova, A. S., Regan, K., Boykin, A., Good, K., Hughes, M., MacVittie, N., ... & Chirinos, D. (2016). Emphasizing planning for essay writing with a computer-based graphic organizer. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 170-191. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The Influence of Planning and Task Type on Second Language Performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-324.
Graney, J. M. (1992). A framework for using text graphing. System, 20(2), 161-167.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41-58). Brill.
Griffin, C. C., & Tulber, R. (1995). Contingent valuation and actual behavior: predicting connections to new water systems in the state of Kerala, India. The World Bank Economic Review, 9(3), 373-395.
Hassan Seif Eldin, D., Mohamed, M., & Ali, A. F. M. (2020). The Effect of Digital Graphic Organizers on Teaching EFL Vocabulary for Primary Stage Pupils and Their Motivation 17(17), 65-97.
Helfgott, A. E. R. (2015). Operationalizing resilience: conceptual, mathematical and participatory frameworks for understanding, measuring and managing resilience (Doctoral dissertation).
Hunt, K. W. (1965). A synopsis of clause-to-sentence length factors. The English Journal, 54(4), 300-309.
Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues.
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 47(1), 61-79.
Juniarti, K., & Sofyan, D. (2017). The Effect of Using Graphic Organizer to Students' Writing Ability. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 1(1), 48-57.
Kang, S. (2004). Using visual organizers to enhance EFL instruction. ELT journal, 58(1), 58-67.
Khoii, R., & Sharififar, S. (2013). Memorization versus semantic mapping in L2 vocabulary acquisition. ELT journal, 67(2), 199-209.
Kılıçkaya, F. (2020). Learners’ perceptions of collaborative digital graphic writing based on semantic mapping. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(1-2), 58-84.
Kim, A. H., Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., & Wei, S. (2004). Graphic organizers and their effects on the reading comprehension of students with LD: A synthesis of research. Journal of learning disabilities, 37(2), 105-118.
Kondrat, A. Importance of Good Writing, fromhttp://www.suite101.com/reference/good_writing, last visited 17 April 2010.
Lorber, M. (2004). Instructional computer technology and student learning: An investigation into using Inspiration™ software to improve eighth-grade students' ability to write (Doctoral dissertation, Fielding Graduate Institute).
Lusk, K. (2014). Teaching high school students scientific concepts using graphic organizers. Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. Paper 895. Retrieved from https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/895.
Manoli, P., & Papadopoulou, M. (2012). Graphic organizers as a reading strategy: Research findings and issues. Creative education, 3(3), 3-48.
Marten, R. L. (2005). The surplus value of an authentic learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 509-521. Martinez, A. (2002). An introduction to semiclassical and microlocal analysis. New York: Springer.
McCagg, E. C., & Dansereau, D. F. (1991). A convergent paradigm for examining knowledge .mapping as a learning strategy. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(6), 317-324.
Miller, S. A. (2011). Using graphic organizers to increase writing performance (Doctoral dissertation).
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University press.
Noviansari, D. (2014). The Use of Graphic Organizer Method to Teach Narrative Text in Senior High School. Purworejo: Muhammadiyah University.
Odewumi, M. O., Gambari, A. I., & Bada, T. A. (2019). Efficacy of Graphic Organizer on Primary School Students Performance in Cognitive Writing Skills. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education (IJTASE), 8(1), 34-41.
Plotnick, E. (1997). Concept mapping: A graphical system for understanding the relationship between concepts (pp. 1998-1). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology.
Robinson, D. H., Maoraf, L. D., & Shaw, S. M. (2006). Computer-based graphic organizer games. Technology and teaching: A casebook for educators, 2(43), 51-63.
Schwartz, S. M., & Fattaleh, D. L. (1972). Representation in deductive problem-solving: The matrix. Journal of experimental psychology, 95(2), 343.
Sharrock, T. (2008). The Effect of Graphic organizer on Students’ Writing. Graphic organizer and Students’ Writing. Action Research. Kennesaw State University.
Sturm, J. M., & Rankin‐Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of hand‐drawn and computer‐generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 124-139.
Tavakoli, P., & Skehan, P. (2005). Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 239 – 277). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Wang, C. F., Cao, F. S., (2009). Grayscale photomask fabricated by laser direct writing in metallic nano-films. Optics Express, 17(22), 19981-19987.
