The Impact of Integrating Think-Pair-Share with Reading Strategy Instruction on Iranian EFL Learners' Motivation
محورهای موضوعی : English Language Teaching (ELT)Zahra Kuhi 1 , Hossein Siahpoosh 2 , Mehran Davaribina 3
1 - Department of English Language, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
کلید واژه: MRQ , Reading comprehension , Reading motivation , Think-Pair-Share , TPS, ,
چکیده مقاله :
Abstract The current study adopted a mixed-method design approach to investigate the effect of the integration of the TPS strategy instruction into reading lessons on EFL students’ motivation to read. One hundred twenty Iranian intermediate EFL students (60 male and 60 female), studying English in a language institute in Iran, were selected and randomly assigned to an experimental group (N = 60) and a control group (N = 60). The experimental group received ten sessions of reading instruction based on the TPS-integrated reading strategy proposed by Baker and Westrup (2000) whereas the control groups received the same amount of instruction on the same materials based on the traditional direct instruction method. Then, the students’ reading motivations were measured using the revised version of the Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ) (Wigfield & Guthrie, 1997). Besides, the students’ attitudes toward the TPS-integrated reading strategy instruction were examined by conducting a semi-structured interview. The analysis of the quantitative data showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of reading motivation. It was also revealed that the integration of the TPS strategy in the reading lessons affected neither the students’ intrinsic motivation nor their extrinsic motivation. However, the findings of the interview concluded that the majority of the participants had developed positive attitudes toward the TPS. Regarding the motivation for reading, however, the findings of the interview were mixed. Finally, the study suggested some practical implications for EFL classrooms.
Abstract The current study adopted a mixed-method design approach to investigate the effect of the integration of the TPS strategy instruction into reading lessons on EFL students’ motivation to read. One hundred twenty Iranian intermediate EFL students (60 male and 60 female), studying English in a language institute in Iran, were selected and randomly assigned to an experimental group (N = 60) and a control group (N = 60). The experimental group received ten sessions of reading instruction based on the TPS-integrated reading strategy proposed by Baker and Westrup (2000) whereas the control groups received the same amount of instruction on the same materials based on the traditional direct instruction method. Then, the students’ reading motivations were measured using the revised version of the Motivation for Reading Questionnaire (MRQ) (Wigfield & Guthrie, 1997). Besides, the students’ attitudes toward the TPS-integrated reading strategy instruction were examined by conducting a semi-structured interview. The analysis of the quantitative data showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of reading motivation. It was also revealed that the integration of the TPS strategy in the reading lessons affected neither the students’ intrinsic motivation nor their extrinsic motivation. However, the findings of the interview concluded that the majority of the participants had developed positive attitudes toward the TPS. Regarding the motivation for reading, however, the findings of the interview were mixed. Finally, the study suggested some practical implications for EFL classrooms.
Ackert, P., & Lee, L. (2005). Thoughts and notions (2nd Ed.). Heinle ELT.
Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171-184.
Baker, J. & Westrup, H. (2000). The English language teacher’s handbook: How to teach large classes with few resources. Continuum.
Carss, W. D. (2007). The effects of using think-pair-share during guided reading lessons. Retrieved June 14, 2020, from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills: Theory and practice. Harcourt Brace.
Cruiskshank, D. R., Bainer Jenkins, D., & Metcalf, K. K. (1995). The act of teaching. McGraw Hill.
Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, D. P. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264.
Eccles, S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivation beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Reviews, 23, 109-132.
Elliot, S., Kratochwill, T., Littlefield-Cook, J., & Travers, J. (2000). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning. McGraw Hill.
Fridkin, L. (2018). The impact of motivation on children’s reading comprehension: Differential effects of gender and ability. UCL, Institute of Education.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, L. F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Pearson Education.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (pp. 403-422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guthrie, J. T., Laurel, A. W. H., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N, M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282-313.
Hairul, N. I., Ahmadi, M. R., & Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2012). The role of reciprocal teaching strategy as an important factor of improving reading motivation. Elixir Edu. Tec, 53(3), 11836-11841.
Hudri, M., & Irwand, H. (2018). Improving students’ reading skill through Think-Pair-Share (TPS) technique. International Conference on Halal Tourism, Products, and Services, 1-9.
Knoll, C. L. (2000). The relationship between motivation and reading comprehension. Graduate Research and Creative Practice, 1-67.
Lin, D., Wong, K. K., & McBride-Chang, C. (2012). Reading motivation and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among bilingual students. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 717-737.
Lyman, F. (1981). Strategies for reading comprehension. Retrieved June 15, 2020, from http://www.teachervision.fen.com/groupwork/cooperativelearning/48547.html
Manan, M. K. (2017). The correlation between students’ motivation in reading English textbooks and their achievement in reading comprehension [Unpublished bachelor thesis]. Walisongo State Institute for Islamic Studies.
Nejad, S. G., & Keshavarzi, A. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension and reading anxiety of pre-university students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(8), 169-180.
Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategies of readers. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 609-640). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pintrich, R., Marx, W., & Boyle, A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199.
Rey, A., Villaverde, S., Irene, R., & Lucas, G. (2016). Second language learning and intrinsic motivation of multilingual Chinese learners in the Philippines. International Journal of Language and Lingual, 7(2), 110-121.
Shih, Y. C., & Reynold, B. L. (2015). Teaching adolescents EFL by integrating think-pair-share and reading strategy instruction: A quasi-experimental study. RELC Journal, 8(3), 1-15.
Stipek, D. (1998). Can a teacher intervention improve classroom practices and student motivation in mathematics? The Journal of Experimental Education, 66(4), 319-337.
Sugiarto, D., & Sumarsono, P. (2014). The implementation of Think-Pair-Share model to improve students’ ability in reading narrative text. International Journal of English and Education, 3(3), 145-159.
Sumekto, D. R. (2018). Investigating the influence of think-pair-share approach toward students’ reading achievement. Lingua Cultural, 12(2), 195-202.
Sukyadi, D., & Hasanah, E. U. (2010). Scaffolding students’ reading comprehension with think-aloud strategy. The language center, Indonesia University Education.
Wichadee, S. (2005). The effects of cooperative learning on English reading skills and attitudes of the first-year students at Bangkok University. BU Academic Review, 4(2), 22-31.
Wei, L. (2005). “How can you tell?” Towards a common-sense explanation of conversational code-switching. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(3), 375-389.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, T. J. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432.
