جامعه شناسی آموزش عالی و ارائه مدل مدیریتی برای دانشگاه های دولتی (دانشگاه های سطح یک ایران)

محورهای موضوعی : جامعه شناسی

زهرا سامانی ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز، تبریز،)
صادق ملکی آوارسین ² (دانشیارگروه علوم تربیتی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز ایران نویسنده مسئول [e-mail])
زرّین دانشورهریس ³ (استاد یار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز، تبریز، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/10/18 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/11/09 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/09/01

کلید واژه: ", جامعه شناسی آموزش عالی", مدیریت دانشگاهی", سیاست گذاری", ارزیابی کیفیت",

چکیده مقاله :

هدف این پژوهش ارائه مدل مدیریتی با نگاهی جامعه شناختی برای دانشگاه های سطح یک ایران در سال 1398 است. روش تحقیق در این پژوهش از نوع کمّی (توصیفی- همبستگی) است. جامعه پژوهش اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه های سطح یک ایران بودند که با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری طبقه ای نسبی، 182 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. ابزار اندازه گیری، پرسش نامه محقق ساخته در56 گویه بود. به منظور بررسی پایایی ابزار اندازه گیری از آلفای کرونباخ، پایایی ترکیبی، پایایی RHO_A و پایایی اشتراکی استفاده شده است. برای بررسی روایی محتوایی از نظر اساتید خبره در رشته آموزش عالی و برای ارزیابی روایی سازه از میانگین واریانس استخراج شده استفاده شده است. داده ها در نرم افزارهای SPSS و LISREL با روش مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری تحلیل شدند. بر اساس نتایج به دست آمده در تحلیل عاملی مرتبه اول، 7 مولفه با 38 شاخص تایید شد و در تحلیل عاملی مرتبه دوم، مولفه های ارزیابی کیفیت، سیاست گذاری، الگوهای مدیریت و رهبری، سازو کارهای مالی، خودمختاری، برنامه ریزی و نظارت دولتی، از بار عاملی کافی برای پیش بینی برخوردار بودند. مقدار شاخص GOF(0.569)، نشان داد که الگوی طراحی شده برای مدیریت دانشگاه های دولتی از برازش مطلوبی برخوردار است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The purpose of this study is to Present a management model with a sociological perspective for public universities of Iran (Top universities) in 2018. The presented research was a quantitative descriptive-correlational study. The research population was the faculty members of level-one universities in Iran. Using proportionate stratified random sampling, 182 people were selected as the sample. The measurement instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire with 56 items. Cronbach's alpha, combined reliability, RHO_A reliability, and shared reliability were used to evaluate the reliability of the measuring instrument. The mean-variance was used to evaluate the content validity from the point of view of professors in the field of higher education and to evaluate the construct validity. Data were analyzed in SPSS and LISREL software by structural equation modeling. Based on the results obtained in the first-order factor analysis, 7 components with 38 indicators were approved, and in the second-order factor analysis, the components of quality evaluation, policy-making, management and leadership patterns, financial mechanisms, autonomy, government planning, and oversight, Had a sufficient factor to predict. The value of the GOF index (0.569) showed that the model designed for public universities' management is a good fit.

منابع و مأخذ:

Agha Tabar Rudbari and Yousefi Saeedabadi, Reza. (2016). Examining the academic independence gap from the perspective of academic experts (a case study of Noshirvani University of Medical Sciences and Technology). Monthly Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, year 10, no. 5, P.p: 334-344.

2. Arasteh, Hamid reza. (2001). Management in universities affiliated to the Ministry of Science, Research and Higher Technology: challenges and shortcomings. Journal of research and planning in higher education, no. 5, P.p: 22-35.


3. Bagheri Moghadam, Naser and Ahmadi, Hasan. (2017). Pathology of governance in Iran's higher education system. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Public Policy, No. 4, P.p: 55-74.


4. Bazargan, Abbas. (2021). Rethinking about continuous quality assessment in Iran's higher education: the necessity of strengthening national institutions and reviewing the evaluation framework. Research and Planning Quarterly in Higher Education, year 4, no.10,P.p:. 1-23.


5. Farsatkhah, Maghsoad. (2017). Iranian university and the issue of quality. Tehran: Agah Publications.


6. Farsatkhah, Maghsoad. (2016). Sometimes and sometimes the university in Iran (new and critical debates about the research university, science studies, and higher education). Tehran: Aghaz Publications.


7. Farasatkhah, Maghsoad and Maniei, Reza. (2014). Factors affecting the participation of faculty members in higher education policy making in university planning. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 4, P.p: 29-53.


8. Fath allahi, Ahmad., Yamani duzi sorkhabi, Mohammad., sabaghiyan, Zahra., Farasatkhah, Maghsoad and Ghazi tabatabie, Mohammad. (2014). Content analysis of Iran's five development programs according to the categories of higher education governance models. Iranian Higher Education Association Quarterly, No. 4, P.p: 47-83.


9. ghaedi, Maryam., Madhoshi, Mehrdad., Razeghi, Nader and Safaie ghadiklaie, Abdolhamid. (2017). Analysis of the policies emphasized by the electronic documents in dealing with academic corruption. Science and Technology Policy Quarterly. No.3. P.p: 1-16.


10. Ghadimi, E. (2013). Pathology of higher education in Iran. Journal of Social Sciences, No. 69, 19-29.


11. Ghafrani, Mohammad bagher and Mohammad Nejad, Yusef. (2012). Structural issues of Iran's higher education system and ways out of it. Tehran: Bureau of Cultural Studies.


12. Javdani, Hamid. (2013). Designing the model of organizational development in Iran's higher education management system. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, No. 4, P.p: 55-74.

13.Khaniki, Hadi., Farstakhah, Maghsoad., ghadimi, Esmaiel and Rasouli, Mohammad Reza. (2012). A glance at the sociology of higher education and the university system of Iran. Social Science Quarterly. No. 69, pp. 4-11.

14. Mazini, Amir hosein. (2016). The pathology of attracting university graduates to the labor market (with emphasis on the role of science and technology parks). Iranian Higher Education Research Quarterly, No. 2, P.p: 19-50.


15. Nesar, Zeynab and raeesi, Laleh. (2015). Investigating structural requirements in the process of internationalization of higher education in Iran: centralization and decentralization. Congress of Higher Education of Iran.


16. Nurshahi, Nasrin. (2008). Necessary competencies for the university president and their relative importance according to Iranian higher education experts. Research and Planning Quarterly in Higher Education, No. 48, P.p: 27-49.


17. Nurshahi, Nasrin and Yamani Duzi Surkhabi, Mohammad. (2006). Investigating the relationship between cognitive style and leadership style among university presidents. Research paper on the basics of education, no. 2, P.p: 12-34.


18. Pardakhtchi, Mohammad Hasan. (2002). Managerial challenges in Higher Education; In Articles Collection Of Round Table: Higher education Challenges, Faculty Of Educational Science and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University.


19. Rabiei, Mohammad., Izadi, Samad., Salehi Omran, Ebrahim and Ahanchiyan, Mohammad reza. (2016). Examining requirements and diversification of financial resources of public universities. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Quarterly, year 7, no. 19, P.p: 141-162.


20. Rasteh Moghadam, Arash and Naderi, Abolghasem. (2014). Patterns of providing financial resources and extracting lessons for Iran's higher education system. Quarterly Journal of Higher Education Association of Iran. Year 7, no. 2, P.p: 151-113.


21. Razzagh marani, Hadi. (2013). Effective institutional independence of Iran's public universities: the necessity of dynamism in a globalized environment. Journal of research and planning in higher education, year 20, no. 4, P.p: 1-28.


22. Ruhani, Shadi and Rashidi, Zahra. (2021). A framework for financial self-governance in universities; Structural-change modeling method (ISM). Research and Planning Quarterly in Higher Education, no. 99, P.p: 125-152.


23. Tanaomi, Mohammad Mahdi. (2012). Management of universities and higher education institutions. Tehran: Samt Publications.


24. Samari, Isae., Yamani Duzi Sorkhabi, Mohammad., Salehi omran, Ebrahim and gharaie nejad, Gholam reza. (2013). Investigating and identifying effective factors in the academic development of Iran's public universities. Educational Planning Studies Quarterly, No. 4, P.p: 67-100.


25. Shirzad, Zeynab., Rajaiepour, Saeed and Mehram, B. (2022). Explaining the challenges of Iran's higher education in the face of globalization (a study based on phenomenology). Scientific quarterly of management and planning in educational systems, no. 6, P.p: 20-37.


26. Yamani Duzi Sorkhabi, Mohammad. (2017). Higher education development planning (reductive approach, complex situation). Tehran: Samt Publications.


27. Yamani Duzi Sorkhabi, Mohammad and Salehi, Monireh. (2014). From strategic planning to adaptive design in the university. Iranian Higher Education Association Quarterly, year 6, no.3, P.p: 1-29.


28. Zahedi, Shams Alsadat and Sheikh, Ebrahim. (2010). Model of strategic capabilities of government middle managers. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Strategic Management Studies, No.1, P.p: 95-139.


29. Zaker Salehi, Gholam reza and Zaker Salehi, Amin. (2010). Examining the views of the managers of scientific centers in the field of academic independence in Iran. Iranian Higher Education Association Quarterly, No. 1, P.p: 33-59.


30. Zakersalehi, Gholam reza and Zaker Salehi, Amin. (2009). Analysis of the draft content of the comprehensive scientific map of the country and the proposal of its evaluation model. Science and Technology Policy Quarterly. No. 2, P.p: 29-45.