• صفحه اصلی
  • Evaluating Quality of Life in a Different Social Setting (Case Study: Magsudiyeh District, MollaZeynal District, and Roshdiyeh District in Tabriz, Iran)

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : SOIJ-1812-1225 (R1) بازدید : 244 صفحه: 41 - 51

20.1001.1.23456450.2019.8.3.4.3

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

Evaluating Quality of Life in a Different Social Setting (Case Study: Magsudiyeh District, MollaZeynal District, and Roshdiyeh District in Tabriz, Iran)

محورهای موضوعی : Space Ontology International Journal

Aynaz Samadi Ahari 1 , Dariush Sattarzadeh 2

1 - Department of Art & Architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 - Department of Art & Architecture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/09/26 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/06/14 تاریخ انتشار : 1398/06/10

کلید واژه: quality of life, Tabriz City, Social Class, Subjective Indicator, Objective Indicator,

چکیده مقاله :

Complex situations of today's life have led to the complexity of urban life issues and not pay attention to the quality of life. Studies in this field are increasingly gaining the attention of urban planners and policymakers due to its usefulness in assessing and monitoring public policies, also they can use as effective tools in urban management and planning. This study investigated the QOL in a different social setting, using subjective and objective indicators. In this research Tabriz City, Iran has been chosen as the sample for this study. Three different social setting were selected by stratified random sampling method. 42 indicators which cover different dimensions of quality of life have been selected through literature review. Multi-stage sampling technique for sampling has been applied. In the first stage by application of Cochran sampling method, the required sample size has been determined. Then by use of systematic sampling method, questionnaires have been distributed among the residents of the neighborhood. The required data has been collected and are analyzed via SPSS software. Results indicate that: In all three case studies, unemployment is the main problem of residents in this city, which causes many problems in the society; In three districts, 4 dimensions of subjective and 3 dimensions of objective QOL are identified. Also, the results show that the respondents' different levels of education, income, occupation status, etc. are important factors that influence people's attitudes toward the quality of life.

چکیده انگلیسی:

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Apparicio, P., Se´guin, A.-M., &Naud, D. (2008). “The quality of the urban environment around public housing buildings in Montre´al: An objective approach based on GIS and multivariate statistical analysis”, Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 355–380. Doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9185-4.
    2.
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1979). “Distinction. A social critique of the judgment of taste”. Translated by: Richard Nice (1984), London: Routledge&Kegan Paul.
    3.
  3. Campbell, A., Converse, R., & Rodgers, W. (1976). “The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions”, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    4.
  4. Camagni, R., Capello, R., &Nijkamp, P. (1998). “Towards sustainable city policy: An economy environment technology nexus”, Ecological Economics, 24, 103–118.
    5.
  5. Cummins, R.S. (2000). “Objective and subjective quality of life: an interactive model”, Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55-72.
    6.
  6. Das, D. (2008). “Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati”, Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297–310. Doi: 10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6.
    7.
  7. Diener, E. (1995). “A value based index for measuring national quality of life”, Social Indicators Research, 36, 107–127. Doi: 10.1007/BF01079721.
    8.
  8. Eby, J., Kitchen, P., & Williams, A. (2012). “Perceptions of quality life in Hamilton's neighborhood hubs: A qualitative analysis”, Social Indicators Research, 108(2), 299–315. Doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0067-z.
    9.
  9. Epley, D. R., &Menon, M. (2008). “A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life”, Social Indicators Research, 88, 281–296.
    10.
  10. Giddens, A. (2006). “Sociology” (5th edition). Cambridge: Polity Press.
    11.
  11. Giddens, A. (1972).“Politics and sociology in the thought of Max Weber” (1 edition-2013). Polity.
    12.
  12. Hardi, P., & Pinter, L. (2006). “City of Winnipeg quality of life indicators”. In M. J. Sirgy, D. Rahtz, & D. Swain (Eds.), Community quality of life indicators: Best cases 2 (pp. 127–176). Berlin: Springer.
    13.
  13. Henslin, J.M. (2012). “Essentials of Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach” (10th Edition). Pearson.
    14.
  14. Ibrahim, M. F., & Chung, S. W. (2003). “Quality of life of residents living near industrial estates in Singapore”, Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 203–225. Doi: 10.1023/a: 1021305620042.
    15.
  15. Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). “Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology”. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    16.
  16. Khaef, S., Zebardast, E. (2016).“Assessing Quality of Life Dimensions in Deteriorated Inner Areas: A case from Javadieh Neighborhood in Tehran Metropolis”, Social Indicators Research, 127:761–775.
    17.
  17. Lee, Y. J. (2008). “Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei”, Building and Environment, 43(7), 1205–1215.
    18.
  18. Marans, R. W., & Rodgers, W. (1975). “Towards an understanding of community satisfaction”. In A. Hawley, & V. Rock (Eds.), Metropolitan America in contemporary perspective (pp. 299e352). New York: Halsted Press.
    19.
  19. Marans, R. W., &Mohai, P. (1991). “Leisure resources, recreation activity, and the quality of life”. In B. L. Driver, P. Brown, & G. L. Peterson (Eds.), The benefits of leisure (pp. 351–363). State College: Venture Publishing.
    20.
  20. Marans, R. W. (2003). “Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 73-83.
    21.
  21. Marans, R. W., & Stimson, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). “Investigating quality of urban life: Theory, method, and empirical research. Dordrecht”, The Netherlands: Springer Publishing.
    22.
  22. Marans, R.W. (2014). “Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future linkage opportunities”, Habitat International, xxx, 1-6.
    23.
  23. McCrea, R., Marans, R., Stimson, R., & Western, J. (2011). “Subjective measurement of quality of life using primary data collection and the analysis of survey data”, In R. W. Marans& R. J. Stimson (Eds.), Investigating quality of urban life (pp. 55–75). Netherlands: Springer.
    24.
  24. Mercier, C., Peladeau, N., &Tempier, R. (1998). “Age, gender, and quality of life”, Community Mental Health Journal, 34(5), 487–500. Doi: 10.1023/a: 1018790429573.
    25.
  25. Nedjat, S., HolakouieNaieni, K., Mohammad, K., Majdzadeh, R., &Montazeri, A. (2011). “Quality of life among an Iranian general population sample using the World Health Organization’s quality of life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF)”, International Journal of Public Health, 56, 55–61.
    26.
  26. Nooraie, H., Tabibian, M. (2012). “Quality of Life in the Decayed Historic Areas of Isfahan (DHI) Using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF)”, Applied Research Quality Life, 7, 371–390. DOI 10.1007/s11482-012-9172-z.
    27.
  27. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). “Psychometric theory” (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    28.
  28. Pacione, M. (2003). “Urban environmental quality and human well-being: A social geographical perspective”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 19–30.
    29.
  29. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., &Keltner, D. (2010). “Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771–784. DOI:10.1037/a0020092
    30.
  30. Rahimi, A. (2016). “A methodological approach to urban land-use change modeling using infill development pattern- a case study in Tabriz, Iran”. Ecological Processes, 5(1), DOI: 10.1186/s13717-016-0044-6.
    31.
  31. Rezvani, M.R., Mansourian, H., Sattari, M.H. (2013). “Evaluating Quality of Life in Urban Areas (Case Study: Noorabad City, Iran)”, Social Indicators Research, 112, 203–220.
    32.
  32. Rigby, S.H. (1998). “Marxism and history, A critical introduction” (second edition). United Kingdom: Manchester University Press
    33.
  33. Roberts B. W. (2015). “Be Your Own Replicator Pigee”. Available at: https://pigee.wordpress.com/2015/04/23/be-your-own-replicator/ [accessed April 23 2015].
    34.
  34. Royuela, V., Moreno, R., &Vaya´, E. (2009). “Influence of quality of life on urban growth: A case study of Barcelona, Spain”, Regional Studies, 44(5), 551–567. Doi: 10.1080/00343400802662682.
    35.
  35. Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., and Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J., Le Roux, B., Friedman, S., & Miles, A. (2013). “A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC's Great British Class Experiment”, Sociology, 47(2), 219–250. DOI:10.1177/0038038513481128
    36.
  36. Seik, F. T. (2001). “Quality of life in cities”, Cities, 18(1), 1–2.
    37.
  37. Talen, E., & Shah, S. (2007). “Neighborhood evaluation using GIS: An exploratory study”, Environment, and Behavior, 39, 583–61
    38.
  38. Tesfazghi, E. S., Martinez, J. J., &Verplanke, J. J. (2009). “Urban quality of life and its spatial distribution in Addis Ababa: Kirkos sub-city”, Thesis for degree of Master of Science in Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Specialisation: (Urban Planning and Management), Enschde, The Netherlands.
    39.
  39. Van Doesum, N.J., M. Tybur, J., & M. Van Lange, P.A. (2017). “Class Impressions: Higher Social Class Elicits Lower Prosociality”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 11-20.
    40.
  40. Zakerhaghighi, k., Khanian, M. &Gheitarani, N. (2014) “Subjective Quality of Life; Assessment of Residents of Informal Settlements in Iran (A Case Study of Hesar Imam Khomeini, Hamedan)”, Applied Research Quality Life, DOI 10.1007/s11482-014-9320-8.
    41.
  41. Zamani-Farahani, H., & Musa, G. (2012). “The relationship between Islamic religiosity and residents' perceptions of socio-cultural impacts of tourism in Iran: case studies of Sare'in and Masooleh”, Tourism Management, 33(4), 802e814.
    42.

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]