شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر تعامل بین دانشجو معلمان کارورز با مدیران مدارس و معلمان راهنما جهت پیشبرد اهداف کارورزی
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیعلیرضا بادله 1 , شیرین پورقاز 2
1 - دانشیار، گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، واحد مهدی‌شهر، سمنان، ایران
کلید واژه: شناسایی, دانشجومعلمان, معلمان کارورز, مدیران, معلمان راهنما, کارورزی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی عوامل موثر بر تعامل بین دانشجو معلمان کارورز با مدیران مدارس و معلمان راهنما جهت پیشبرد اهداف کارورزی است. روش پژوهش حاضر آمیخته (کیفی و کمی) است. در بخش کیفی با روش پدیدارشناسی و در بخش کمی، با استفاده از بکارگیری تکنیک معادلات ساختاری، تأثیر عوامل بررسی شد. جامعه¬ی آماری پژوهش شامل کلیه¬ی خبرگان، دانشجومعلمان کارورز، مدیران مدارس و معلمان راهنما استان مازندران است. برای انتخاب حجم نمونه در بخش کیفی از نمونه‌گیری گلوله‌برفی استفاده شد و تعداد 22 نفر به عنوان نمونه پژوهشی انتخاب شدند و در بخش کمی از روش نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ای نسبی استفاده شده و تعداد 135 خبره، معلم راهنما و مدیر و 303 دانشجومعلم به عنوان نمونه پژوهشی انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه‌ی محقق ساخته بر اساس یافته‌های حاصل از روش مضمون دپوی و گیتلین بر اساس طیف لیکرت 7 درجه‌ای طراحی شد که مشتمل بر 11، 16، 13، 13، 13 و 10 گویه در زمینه عوامل فرهنگی- اجتماعی، ویژگی‌های روانی- شخصیتی، زیرساخت‌ها و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی، رویکردها و راهبردهای آموزشی، دانش و آگاهی بود. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد عوامل فرهنگی- اجتماعی، ویژگی‌های روانی- شخصیتی، زیرساخت‌ها و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی، رویکردها و راهبردهای آموزشی، دانش و آگاهی بر تعامل بین دانشجو معلمان کارورز با مدیران مدارس و معلمان راهنما جهت پیشبرد اهداف کارورزی موثر می‌باشد. نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که عوامل مذکور از مهم‌ترین عوامل موثر بر تعامل بین دانشجو معلمان کارورز با مدیران مدارس و معلمان راهنما جهت پیشبرد اهداف کارورزی هستند.
The purpose of this research is to identify the factors influencing the interaction between student intern teachers with school principals and guidance teachers in order to advance the goals of internship. The current research method is mixed (qualitative and quantitative). The statistical population of the research includes all experts, students, intern teachers, school principals and guidance teachers of Mazandaran province. To select the sample size in the qualitative part, snowball sampling was used and 22 people were selected as the research sample And in a small part, the method of relative stratified sampling is used and 135 experts, guidance teachers and administrators and 303 student teachers were selected as the research sample. became the research tool included a researcher's questionnaire based on the findings of the Depoy and Gitlin's theme method new design based on a 7-point Likert scale, which includes 11, 16, 13, 13, 13 and 10 items in the field of social-cultural factors. Psychological-personality characteristics, educational infrastructure and planning, management and planning, educational approaches and strategies, knowledge and awareness. The findings of the research showed that cultural-social factors, psychological-personality characteristics, educational infrastructure and planning, management and planning, educational approaches and strategies, knowledge and awareness on the interaction between student teacher interns with school principals and guidance teachers in order to advance the goals of effective internship. is. The results of the present study showed that the mentioned factors are among the most important factors affecting the interaction between student intern teachers with school administrators and guidance
Amiri, A. (2021). New and transformative education. Quarterly Journal of New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, (67)5, 179-193
Attaran, A., Musapour, N., Attaran, M., & Hosseinikhah, A. (2017). A historical perspective to the revision of teacher education curricula in Iran, Iranian Curriculum Studies Quarterly, (46) 12, 85-118.
Badeleh, A. (2020). Identifying the effective components on improving the quality of internship implementation and evaluating the current situation in Farhangian University of Mazandaran Province, Journal of Educational and Educational Studies, 9(4), 35-7.
Chennat, S. (2014). Internship in Pre-Service teacher Education Program: A Global Perspective. International Journal of research in Applied Natural and Social Sciences. 2(11). pp79-94.
Farrokhi, A., & Tatari, A. (2020). Internship and its effect on empowering student teachers. Research in humanities education, 6(21), 1-14.
Ghanbari, M., Ahmadi Isaabadi, V., Nikkhah, M., & Ghanbari, S. (2017). Examining the attitude of Farhangian University students towards the internship course (a case study of student teachers in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province), the second national conference on sustainable development in educational sciences and psychology, social and cultural studies, Tehran.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA, Sociology Press.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
Habibi, H., Jafari Herandi, R., & Bahrami, S. (2021). The components of the curriculum model of the internship based on the subject of the study: Farhangian University lecturers and curriculum experts. Iranian Curriculum Studies Journal, (63) 16, 91-116.
Hajizadeh Anari, H. (2022). Conceptual model of Farhangian University based on the document of fundamental transformation of education. Quarterly Journal of Teacher Education Policy Studies, (3)5, 116-145.
Jafarian Yasara, H., & Jafarian Yesara, F. (2018). Development of professional qualifications of student teachers with emphasis on internship. Internship studies in teacher training, (1)1, 54-76.
Jafarikamangar, F., & Ehsani-Tilmi, S. (2020). Evaluation of the quality of implementation of the internship program in Farhangian University of Mazandaran province, Educational and Educational Studies Journal, (4)9, 261-289.
Jamshidi Tawana, A., Imam Jumeh, M., Ozra, A., & Musapour, N. (2016). Analyzing the experiences of student teachers of Farhangian University of Tehran from the internship course. Scientific Journal of Education and Learning Research, (2) 14, 67-77.
Kersol, John and Planoclark, Vicky. (2022). Combined research methods. Translated by Alireza Kiamanesh and Javaid Sarai. Tehran: Aizh. (The publication date of the work in the original language, 2007).
Karimi Baghmolek, A., Taheri Nia, A., Sarsarabi, SH., Pak Sarasht, M., & Fisherman, F. (2022). Similarities and differences of teacher training system in Iran and Finland. Comparative studies of teacher training (Kaush Nameh International), (1) 1, 119-137.
Karimi, A., & Abdi, A. (2022). Communication challenges of Farhangian University's virtual internship during the Covid-19 pandemic. Educational Research Quarterly, (32)8, 119-108.
Kaviani, R. (2021). The role of school administrators in improving the quality of the internship period. National internship and creative conference at Farhangian University. The second regional internship conference; Development of professional competences, 21 May, Farhangian University of Imam Khomeini Campus, Gorgan. Gorgan.
Khamenei, S. (2015). Teaching charter in the words of the Supreme Leader. first edition, Tehran: Farhangian University.
Khosravi, R. (2021). An exploration of the effect of Farhangian University's skill training program in improving the skills of students in Article 28. Two Quarterly Journals of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, (23) 12, 101-69.
Khrushi, P., distress, C., & Ghorbani, S. (2020). Examining the problems and problems of the internship course from the teachers of Farhangian University (case study). Farhangian University of Isfahan). Research in education and training, (1)3, 13-39.
Musapour, N., Safarnavadeh, M., Azhari, M., & Mohammad Shafiei, A. (2019). Life experience of student teachers of Farhangian University from Iran's new teacher training intern program. Higher Education Curriculum Studies, (10) 19, 149-169.
Pan, J., Guan, Y., Wu, J., Han, L., Zhu, F., Fu, X., et al. (2018). The interplay of proactive personality and internship quality in Chinese university graduates’ job search success: The role of career adaptability. J. Vocat. Behav. 109, 14–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.09.003.
Pickard, A.J. (2007). Research Methods in Information. London: Facet.
Rajai Topkanelo, E., & Mahmoudi, M. (2021). Identifying and analyzing factors affecting the success of the internship course in empowering student teachers. Bi-quarterly survey of research in educational sciences and counseling, (14)7, 103-120.
Safari, A., Askari, F., & Ebrahimi, SH. (2022). The importance and position of guidance teachers in motivating student teachers (Study: Internship lesson. Campaign in humanities education, (29) 7).
Safari, A., Ebrahimi, SH., & Askari, F. (2022). The importance and position of guidance teachers in motivating student teachers. Journal of research in humanities education of Farhangian University, (29), 139-171.
Salerni, A., Sposetti, P., & Szpunar, G.(2008). Narrative writing and University Internship Program. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences.140(2014).pp133-137.
Tajari, T. (2018). Recognizing the role of internship in the curriculum of continuous undergraduate course of Farhangian University. The second regional internship conference; Development of professional competences, 21 May, Farhangian University of Imam Khomeini Campus, Gorgan. Gorgan.
Tarshizi, B., Hosseinpour, S., & Karamati, E. (2015). Examining the reasons for the non-participation of guidance teachers in the implementation of the student-teacher internship program of Farhangian University: a case study of the field of educational sciences. Poish Journal of Educational Sciences Education and Counseling, (4)2, 51-34
