ارائة چارچوب پیشنهادی برای برنامه درسی کار و فناوری مقطع متوسطه اول با تأکید بر الگوی کلاس معکوس
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
زهرا ابوالحسنی
1
(
دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشکده روان‌شناسی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
)
سعید صفایی موحد
2
(
استادیار دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
)
کلید واژه: کلاس‌معکوس, الگوی آموزشی, برنامه درسی کار و فناوری,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه و تبیین چارچوب پیشنهادی برنامه درسی کار و فناوری مقطع متوسطة اول بر اساس الگوی کلاس‌معکوس صورت گرفت. روش پژوهش، کیفی از نوع دلالت‌پژوهی است؛ زیرا دلالت‌هایی از نظریة کلاس‌معکوس برای ارائة چارچوب برنامه درسی کار و فناوری استفاده شده است و از نظر هدف کاربردی است. حوزة پژوهش تمامی متون علمی مربوط به الگوی یادگیری معکوس است و از روش نمونه‌گیری ملاک‌محور بهره برده شد. ملاک‌های مورد نظر برای انتخاب نمونه عبارت‌اند از: متون الگوی یادگیری معکوس، مقالات منتشر شده از سایت‌های معتبر که همچنین در 5 سال اخیر به انتشار رسیده باشند. روایی این پژوهش توسط استادان علوم تربیتی دانشکده روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه تهران بررسی و مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. پژوهش حاضر به مطالعة مبانی نظری الگوی کلاس‌معکوس پرداخته و دلالت‌های آن را در چهار حوزة اهداف که عبارت‌اند از (تقویت شناخت سبک یادگیری، مهارت حل مسئله، خلق عادات ذهنی نظیر کنجکاوی و ایجاد توانایی بهره‌گیری از مهارت‌های ارتباطی)، محتوا (بر اساس ملاک‌هایی مانند سبک یادگیری متفاوت دانش‌آموزان، دانش‌آموزمحوری، مسئله‌محوری، خودآموز بودن و قابلیت چندرسانه‌ای انتخاب شود)، برای راهبردهای تدریس از روش‌هایی با عنوان (روش تدریس حل مسئله، تفکر خلاق، کار گروهی، بحث گروهی، آموزش انفرادی و آموزش برنامه‌ای و روش تدریس نمایشی را می‌توان استفاده کرد) و در ارزشیابی برنامه درسی کار و فناوری (از ارزشیابی اصیل استفاده شود که اجازة خودسنجی به دانش‌آموز دهد) ارائه شد.
The purpose of this study was to present and explain the proposed framework of work and technology curriculum of the first high school based on the flipped classroom pattern. Qualitative research method is of the type of implication research because it uses implications of flipped classroom theory for the presentation of the Kar & Fanavari curriculum framework and it is in terms of applied purpose. The research population is all scientific literature related to the flipped classroom pattern and the criterion-based sampling method was used. The criteria for sample selection are: flipped classroom Patterns texts, published articles from reputable sites and also published in the last 5 years. The validity of this study was evaluated and confirmed by the faculty members of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Tehran. The present study aims at studying the theoretical foundations of the flipped classroom pattern and its arguments in four areas of purpose (enhancement of learning style, problem solving skills, creation of mental habits such as curiosity and the ability to utilize communication skills), Content (based on criteria such as different student learning styles, Student-centered, problem-oriented, self-learning and multi-media capability selected), For teaching strategies, one can use methods called problem solving teaching, creative thinking, teamwork, group discussion, individual training, and program teaching and demonstrative teaching methods and in assessing the work and technology curriculum was presented (using genuine evaluation to allow student self-assessment).
Adib,y& Ezati,M&FathiAzar,E&Mohamadi,F. (2016). A Framework for Designing an Optimal Model for Work and Technology Course. Journal of Curriculum Studies,10(40),33-60(in person).
Albashiry, N. M., Voogt, J. M., & Pieters, J. M. (2015). Teacher collaborative curriculum design in technical vocational colleges: a strategy for maintaining curriculum consistency?. The Curriculum Journal, 26(4), 601-624.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education
Clark.K. (2015).The Effects of the Flipped Model of Instruction on Student Engagement and Performance in the Secondary Mathematics Classroom.Journal of Educators Online, v12 n1,p:91-115.
Danai fard, H. (2016). Methodology of Magnitude Research in Social Sciences and Human Sciences: Foundations, Definitions, Importance, Approaches and Implementation Processes, Quarterly Journal of Humanities Methodology, 86, 71-39(in persian).
Dehghani,M & Pakmehr,H. (2016). Determinition of students active involvement with the newly poblished books of scince and
math: focusing on six grade books. Research in urriculum planning, 12(20),74-89(in persian).
Demiski,J. (2013). 6 Expert Tips for Flipping the Classroom.Campus Technology, v25, n5,p:32-37.
EDUCAUSE, A. (7). 7 things you should know about flipped classrooms.
Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27.
Gilboy, S Heinerichs, G Pazzaglia. (2015).Enhancing Student Engagement Using the Flipped Classroom.Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. V 47, Issue 1,p:109-Guild
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). A review of flipped learning. Retrieved from
Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
Hultén, M., & Larsson, B. (2016). The Flipped Classroom: Primary and Secondary Teachers’ Views on an Educational Movement in Schools in Sweden Today. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1-11.
Jafari Harandi, Reza. (2015). The study of the external efficiency of the technical and vocational college during 2009-2011 (research: technical and vocational schools of Yazd province), educational evaluation and assessment studies, 5 (9), 173-198(in persian).
Khalvandi, F & Bazrafshan, M. (2016). Efective of cooperative learning on students educational performance and attitude on the basic of jigasaw pazzel pattern. Research in urriculum planning,13(23),113-125(in persian).
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160-173.
Lane-Kelso.M. (2015). THE PEDAGOGY OF FLIPPED INSTRUCTION IN OMAN. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,v14, issue 1,p:143-150.
Lattuca, L., & Stark, J. (2009). Shaping the college curriculum: Academic plans in context.
Love, B., Hodge, A., Corritore, C., & Ernst, D. C. (2015). Inquiry-based learning and the flipped classroom model. PRIMUS, 25(8), 745-762.
Marshall, H. W., & DeCapua, A. (2013). Making the transition to classroom success: Culturally responsive teaching for struggling language learners.
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 430–435.
Milman, N. B. (2012). The flipped classroom strategy: What is it and how can it best be used? Distance Learning, 9, 85–87.
Moran,K.Milsom,A. (2015).The Flipped Classroom in Counselor Education.Counselor Education and Supervision.V, 54. Issue 1. P: 32–43.
Munzenmaier, C., & Rubin, N. (2013). Perspectives Bloom’s taxonomy: What’s old is new again. Santa Rosa, CA: The eLearning
Mzbouhi, S&Sharafi, M&Moghadam, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship Education Curriculum: Purpose, Content, Teaching Method and Evaluation Method. Creativity and Creativity in the Humanities, Vol. 1, No. 3, 130-97(in persian).
Maleki, H. (2009). Curriculum Development (Action Guide), Mashhad: Andisheh Message.
Mehmohammadi, M. (2012). Curriculum: Viewpoints, Approaches, and Perspectives, Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi(in persian).
N, 6.p:16-20
Noonoo, S. (2012). Flipped learning founders set the record straight. The Journal: Transforming Education Through Technology. Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/Articles/2012/06/20/ Flipped-learning-founders-q-and-a.aspx?Page=1
Oflaherty.J,Phillips,c. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review.The Internet and Higher Education.v25,p:85-95.
Papadopoulos, C., & Roman, A. S. (2010). Implementing an inverted classroom model in engineering statics: Initial results. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.
Publications.
Roach,T. (2014).Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics.International Review of Economics Education. V17, p:74–84.
Sadeghi, F. (2011). Assessment of vocational and technical boys’ vocational schools in Sanandaj city using SIP model (CIPP, Master thesis, Shahid Chamran University) (in persian).
Sadri, A. (2009). Design of the curriculum design for general and secondary vocational education. Curriculum Curriculum Curriculum. Fourth year. No13,14. 104-82(in persian).
Saif, A (2014). Modern Psychology: Psychology of Learning and Education (Seventh Edition). Tehran: the Doran(in persian).
Sams,A. Bergmann,J. (2013).Flip Your Students’ Learning.Technology-Rich Learning.V, 70.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schwartz, T. A., Andridge, R. R., Sainani, K. L., Stangle, D. K., & Neely, M. L. (2016). Diverse Perspectives on a Flipped Biostatistics Classroom. Journal of Statistics Education, 24(2), 74-84.
Seraji, F& Attaran, M& Naderi, E & Ali Asgari, M. (2007). Virtual University Curriculum Design. Curriculum Curriculum Curriculum. Number 6. 79-118(in persian).
Sha’bani, H. (2010). Educational skills (Volume I), Tehran: Samt(in persian).
Talakhabi, M. (2008). Brain-based curriculum. Educational Innovations Journal. Vol 7. No 26. 127-150(in persian).
Talley, C. P., & Scherer, S. (2013). The enhanced flipped classroom: Increasing academic performance with student-recorded lectures and practice testing in a” flipped” STEM course. The Journal of Negro Education, 82(3), 339-347
Wiles, J. (2009). Leading curriculum development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research, design and methods. Newbury Park: Sage
Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660-670.
_||_