Collective Efficacy of TEFL Students in Collaborative Content Learning Classroom
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Rogayeh Eslami
1
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
Mahnaz Saeidi
2
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
Touran Ahour
3
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Collective Efficacy, Collaborative content learning, TEFL students,
چکیده مقاله :
Collaborative content learning (CCL) has recently gained prominence in the research literature as a process of learning that contributes to effective learning of the content of the courses in EFL contexts. This quantitative ex-post facto research was conducted among TEFL students at the MA level selected based on purposive and convenience sampling. It was an attempt to investigate the attitudes of TEFL students toward the contribution of CCL to collective efficacy (CE). To this end, sixty male and female participants in the master's program participated in the study. The participants have already been exposed to implementing CCL based on its principles and have been familiar with the underlying assumptions of CCL. Statistical analysis of students' responses to the CE questionnaire revealed that most learners believe that CE in CCL is important in EFL teaching and learning context, and learners have positive attitudes towards working collaboratively on the content. They stated that working collaboratively on the content positively changes their group members' learning and leads to successful learning because it encourages them when a similar group successfully conducts a task. The study's findings suggest the beneficial role of CCL in raising students' awareness of skillful collaboration for maximum learning of the content and for their CE.
Abedini, F. & Chalak, A. (2017). Investigating the Inhibitive Factors in the Speaking of Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(6), 82-97.
Anderson, C. M., Summers, K. H., Kopatich, R. D., & Dwyer, W. B. (2023). Collective Teacher Efficacy and Its Enabling Conditions: A Proposed Framework for Influencing Collective Efficacy in Schools. AERA Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231175060
Andriessen, K., Draper, B., Dudley, M. & Mitchell, P. (2016). Pre- and Postloss Features of Adolescent Suicide Bereavement: A Systematic Review. Death Studies, 40, 229-46.
Atman , N., & Durak, H. (2022). Predicting learner autonomy in collaborative learning: The role of group Metacognition and Motivational Regulation Strategies. Learning and Motivation, 78, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101804
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York.
Bandura, A. (2006) Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164-180.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivee, S. (1991). Influence of Self-Efficacy on Self-Regulation and Performance among Junior and Senior High-School Age Students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 14, 153-164.
Chen, X., Lake, J., & Padilla, A. M. (2021). Grit and motivation for learning English among Japanese university students. System,96,102-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102411
Donohoo, J. & Eells, R. (2018). The power of collective efficacy. Educational Leadership, 75(6), 40-44.
Donohoo, J. & Katz, S. (2020). Quality implementation: Leveraging collective efficacy to make "what works" actually work. Corwin Press.
ElMassah, S., & mohieldin, M. (2019). Digital transformation and localizing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Ecological Economics,4(2), 449-459.
Gerlach, J.M. (1994). Is This Collaboration? In K. Bosworth, & S.J. Hamilton (Eds.), Collaborative Learning: Underlying Processes and Effective Techniques (pp. 5-14). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219945903
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1163531.
Gully, S., Incalcaterra, K., Joshi, A. & Beauien, J. (2002). A Meta-Analysis of Team-Efficacy, Potency, and Performance: Interdependence and Level of Analysis as Moderators of Observed Relationships. The Journal of applied psychology, 87(9), 819-32. https://doi.org 10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
Harris, A. D., McGregor, J. C., Perencevich, E. N., Furuno, J. P., Zhu, J., Peterson, D. E., & Finkelstein, J. (2006). The Use and Interpretation of Quasi-Experimental Studies in Medical Informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.m1749
Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students' reading comprehension. System,38(2),96-108.
Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113, 350-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300205
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st century. Anales de psicología, 30 (3), 841-851.
Lanfear, C. C. (2022). Collective efficacy and the built environment. Criminology, 60, 370– 396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12304
Linnenbrink, E.A. & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The Role of Self Efficacy Beliefs in Student Engagement and Learning in the Classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group Work, Inter language talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3586827.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P., Spence, J., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423-458.
Martinez, F., Taut, S., & Schaaf, K. (2016). Classroom observation for evaluating and improving teaching: An international perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 49(2), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.002
Qadach, M., Erdogan, U., Schwabsky, N., Schechter, C. & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2022), "Collective teacher efficacy beliefs: testing measurement invariance using alignment optimization among four cultures", Journal of Educational Administration, 60(2), 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2021-0032
Rosander, M. , Salin, D., & Viita, L. (2020) Gender matters: workplace bullying, gender, and mental health. Front Psychol, 11(4),1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560178
Salas-Rodríguez, F. & Lara Ros, S. (2022). Unpacking collective teacher efficacy in primary schools: student achievement and professional development. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09326-z.
Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2019). Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(1), 7–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9293-y
Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 31-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00956756
Sharan, Y. & Sharan, S. (1992). Expanding Cooperative Learning through Group Investigation. Teachers College Press.
Smith, B.L., & MacGregor, J.T. (1992). What Is Collaborative Learning? The Journal of Educational Research,4(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Pearson. http://doi.org/10.12691/education-6-8-16
Tian, M., & Lu, G. S. (2017). What price the building of world-class universities? Academic pressure faced by young lecturers at a research-centered university in China. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(8), 957–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319814.
Vega-Abarzúa, J., Pastene-Fuentes, J., Pastene-Fuentes, C., Ortega-Jiménez, C., & CastilloRodríguez, T. (2022). Collaborative learning and classroom engagement: A pedagogical experience in an EFL Chilean context. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 5(1), 60-74.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence,22(1),31–39.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
Wang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2022). A student grouping method for massive online collaborative learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(3), 18-33. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i03.29429
