A Comparative Study of the Effects of the TBLT Method and ENGAGE Model on Iranian EFL Learners' CAF in Writing Performance

محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Javad Gholami ¹ , Mohaddeseh Salimpoor Aghdam ² , Mahnaz Saedi ³

1 - Department of English Language, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran
2 - Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/07/05 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/08/17 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/03/20

کلید واژه: Complexity, Accuracy, Fluency,

چکیده مقاله :

The ever-growing needs for writing ability in English in the global context has given priority to finding more effective ways to teach L2 writing. A thorough analysis of the pertinent literature indicated a dearth of empirical research in ELT regarding the effect of applying the ENGAGE model on the writing skills of L2 learners. Therefore, the current study sought to ascertain how the ENGAGE Model and Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) method affected the complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) of Iranian EFL learners' writing performance. Sixty-seven Iranian female EFL learners aged 18 to 25 at Urmia University language center were chosen for the quasi-experimental study based on their level of proficiency on the standard Oxford Quick Placement Test (OPT) in 2022. The participants were randomly divided into three groups and instructed based on the principles of the ENGAGE model (n = 22), TBLT model (n = 24), and control group (n = 21). Pretesting, intervention, and post-testing were all the processes that the study participants underwent. The null hypotheses were tested after the data were analyzed by applying multivariate ANCOVA (MANCOVA) measures. The study of the post-test data revealed that the ENGAGE model, as opposed to TBLT, had a more significant effect on the overall L2 CAF in Iranian EFL learners' ability to write essays. The results of the present study can be applied by ELT experts and curriculum designers in EFL and ESL settings. English learners and instructors can use the ENGAGE model to address linguistic and metalinguistic issues.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The ever-growing needs for writing ability in English in the global context has given priority to finding more effective ways to teach L2 writing. A thorough analysis of the pertinent literature indicated a dearth of empirical research in ELT regarding the effect of applying the ENGAGE model on the writing skills of L2 learners. Therefore, the current study sought to ascertain how the ENGAGE Model and Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) method affected the complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) of Iranian EFL learners' writing performance. Sixty-seven Iranian female EFL learners aged 18 to 25 at Urmia University language center were chosen for the quasi-experimental study based on their level of proficiency on the standard Oxford Quick Placement Test (OPT) in 2022. The participants were randomly divided into three groups and instructed based on the principles of the ENGAGE model (n = 22), TBLT model (n = 24), and control group (n = 21). Pretesting, intervention, and post-testing were all the processes that the study participants underwent. The null hypotheses were tested after the data were analyzed by applying multivariate ANCOVA (MANCOVA) measures. The study of the post-test data revealed that the ENGAGE model, as opposed to TBLT, had a more significant effect on the overall L2 CAF in Iranian EFL learners' ability to write essays. The results of the present study can be applied by ELT experts and curriculum designers in EFL and ESL settings. English learners and instructors can use the ENGAGE model to address linguistic and metalinguistic issues.

منابع و مأخذ:

References
Abdollahzadeh, M., Barjesteh, H., & Biria, R. (2021). The impact of teaching through engage model on L2 speaking of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Horizons, 5(2), 205-214.
Abdollahzadeh, M., Barjesteh, H., & Biria, R. (2023). A study on the efficacy of ENGAGE model in improving speaking components of EFL learners: A comparative methodological approach. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 2(3), 56-64. doi:10.22034/ijce.2023.361770.1436
Ahmed, R. Z., & Bidin, S. J. B. (2016). The effect of task-based language teaching on writing skills of EFL learners in Malaysia. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 6(03), 207-218.
Alghizzi, T. M. (2017). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) development in L2 writing: the effects of proficiency level, learning environment, text type, and time among Saudi EFL learners (Doctoral doctoral dissertation), University College Cork.
Aliakbari, M., & Jamalvandi, B. (2010). The impact of role play on fostering EFL learners' speaking ability: A task-based approach. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 15-29.
Berthold, M. (2011). Reliability of quick placement tests: How much faith can we place on quick paper or internet-based placement tests. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6), 674-698.
Brown, A. (2006). An examination of the rating process in the revised IELTS speaking test. International English Language Testing System (IELTS) Research Reports,6, 1-16.
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M. (Eds.). (2014). Task-based language learning-insights from and for L2 writing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Chaouchi, N., & Bahloul, A. (2023). The Impact of TBLT in Developing EFL Students’ Writing Performance Case study: Third-year Students in the Department of English at Tebessa University. Revue Académique des Études Sociales et Humaines, 15(1), 433-447
Ellis, R. W. (2019). Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 454-475.
Ellis, R. W. (2022). Task-based language teaching: Early days, now and into the future. In N. P. Sudharshana & L. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Task-based language teaching and assessment: Contemporary reflections from across the world (pp. 39-61). Springer Nature Singapore.
Ellis, R. W., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford University Press.
Esfandiari, S., Mahmoudi, A., & Davaribina, M. (2021). ENGAGE model as an innovation in teaching speaking: A case of cognitively more and less active EFL learners. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures 13(4), 729-753.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-323.
Ghavamnia, M., Tavakoli, M., & Esteki, M. (2013). The effect of pre-task and online planning conditions on complexity, accuracy and fluency on EFL learners' written production. Learning, 12(3), 112–125.
Halsey, R.W. (2016). The first ten things I learned in the wilderness. Stop talking at me. Retrieved from www.californiachaparral.org
Halsey, R. W., Halsey, V. W., & Gaudette, R. (2018). Connecting Californians with the chaparral. In E. C. Underwood, H. D. Safford, N. A. Molinari, & J. E. Keeley (Eds.), Valuing chaparral: Ecological, socio-economic, and management perspectives (pp. 295-322). Springer
Halsey, V. W. (2011). Brilliance by Design. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Halsey, V. W., & Halsey, R. W. (2017). Connecting Californians with the Chaparral through the ENGAGE Model. Retrieved from www.californiachaparral.org/naturecenters.html.
Healy, K., & Mulholland, J. (2019). Writing skills for social workers. SAGE Publications Limited.
Hill, N. E., & Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children's academic achievement pragmatics and issues. Current directions in psychological science, 13(4), 161-164.
Hodge, D. C., Baxter Magolda, M. B., & Haynes, C. A. (2009). Engaged learning: Enabling self-authorship and effective practice. Liberal Education, 95(4), 16-23.
Kilbourne, C. (2011). Connect, inspire, and ENGAGE: A model for improving safety training. New Learning Trends, 2(3), 2021, from https://ehsdailyadvisor.blr.com
Motallebzadeh, K., & Nematizadeh, S. (2011). Does gender play a role in the assessment of oral proficiency?. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 165-172.
Nemat Tabrizi, A.R., & Hosseini, S. (2016). The effect of using task-based activities on writing performance of Iranian introvert vs. extrovert EFL learners. International Journal of Modern Language Teaching and Learning, 1(4), 159–167.
Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2014). Task repetition and L2 writing development. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.). Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing (pp.107–118). John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590-601.
Plakans, L., Gebril, A., & Bilki, Z. (2016). Shaping a score: Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in integrated writing performances. Language Testing, 36(2), 161-179.
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy (Vol. 20). Oxford University Press.
Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2016). A comprehensive meta-analysis of handwriting instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 225-265.
Seedhouse, P. (1999). Task-based interaction. ELT Journal, 53(3), 149-156.
Shomi, T. I. (2022). The effects of task-based language teaching approach in teaching and learning of English reading and writing skills (Doctoral dissertation), Brac University.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P. (2009). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. In K. Van den Branden, M. Bygate, & J. Norris (Eds.), Task-based language teaching (pp. 121-132). John Benjamins.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49, 93-120.
Sundari, H., Febriyanti, R. H., & Saragih, G. (2018). Using task-based materials in teaching writing for EFL classes in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 119–124.
Willis, J. (2019). A framework for task-based learning (2nd ed.). Longman.
Xia, P. (2023). A Review on the International Task-Based Language Teaching in Recent Ten Years: A Scientometric Analysis Based on CiteSpace. Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, 2(2), 34-42.
Zohrabi, M., & Abasvand, Y. (2014). The effects of task repetition on improving Iranian EFL learners' accuracy and complexity in writing proficiency. International Journal of English and Education, 3(2), 156-165.