Shedding Light on Ecological Critical Language Awareness Construct: A Questionnaire Development and Validation Study in the Iranian EFL Context

محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Ghazaleh Cheraghpour Samvati ¹ , Parviz Maftoon ² , Mojgan Rashtchi ³

1 - Department of English, Faculty of Literature, Humanities, and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English, Faculty of Literature, Humanities, and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - TEFL Department, Faculty of Foreign Languages, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/09/04 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/10/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/06/10

کلید واژه: Critical Language Awareness, Questionnaire Development, Ecolinguistics, Environmental Studies, Construct Validation,

چکیده مقاله :

The study of ecolinguistics to date has been reserved for the field of discourse analysis. However, applying ecolinguistics in pedagogical contexts is a promising way to increase learners’ critical language awareness. To realize this potential, one needs validated measures to quantify learners’ critical language awareness in ecological contexts to conduct research in this field. In the absence of any instrument to measure language learners’ ecological critical language awareness, the researchers of this study developed and validated a questionnaire. An exploratory sequential mixed methods design with two phases was employed. In the exploratory and qualitative phases, the researchers defined the construct and developed a questionnaire based on the underlying factors of the construct. After taking several steps to ensure its content validity, the questionnaire was administered to 200 intermediate-level EFL learners who were selected through convenience sampling. In the quantitative phase, the participants were exposed to ecolinguiscally-informed teaching materials in an English pedagogical context. The collected data were analyzed, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Cronbach alpha coefficient for reliability indices, and model evaluation estimates were run to ensure the measure’s reliability and validity. EFA substantiated the initial components of the six-factor tentative construct. CFA gave statistical support to the six components as well. All components enjoyed high-reliability estimates. The calculated model-fit estimates verified the CFA model as a valid measure of ecological critical language awareness. The developed measure paves the way for further empirical investigation of ways to raise learners’ ecological critical language awareness in EFL contexts.

منابع و مأخذ:

Alexander, R., & Stibbe, A. (2014). From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences, 41, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011

Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. SAGE.

Chen, S. (2016). Language and ecology: A content analysis of ecolinguistics as an emerging research field. Ampersand, 3(1), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMPER.2016.06.002

Chen, G., Mathieu, J. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2004). A framework for conducting multi-level construct validation. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Danereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: The many faces of multi-level issues (Vo1. 3, pp. 273-303). Elsevier. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(04)03013-9

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5^th ed.). SAGE.

Damico, J. S., Baildon, M., & Panos, A. (2020). Climate justice literacy: Stories‐we‐live‐by, ecolinguistics, and classroom practice. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(6), 683-691. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1051

Dörnyei, Z. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, Processing (2^nd ed.). Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power (2^nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250

Fill, A. (1997). Ecolinguistics as a European idea. The European Legacy, 2(3), 450-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848779708579756

Fill, A. (1998). Ecolinguistics: State of the art 1998. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 3-16.

Fill, A., & Mühlhäusler, P. (2001). The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology, and environment. Continuum.

Goatly, A. (2002). The representation of nature on the BBC World Service. Text, 22(1), 1-27. http://doi.org/10.1515/text.2002.003

Gul, R., Hussain, S., & Ali, S. (2021). An ecolinguistic analysis of metafunctions of language in Pakistani COVID-19 advertorials. Global Language Review, 6(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2021(VI-I).10

Haig, E. (2001). A Study of the application of critical discourse analysis to ecolinguistics and the teaching of eco-literacy. Studies in Language and Culture (Nagoya University, Faculty of Language and Culture), 22(2), 205-226.

Haig, E. (2003). How green was my textbook? Towards an ecological critical language awareness pedagogy. Studies in Language and Culture (Nagoya University, Faculty of Language and Culture), 24(2), 189-222.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1992). New ways of analyzing meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In M. Pütz (Ed.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution (pp.59-95). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.61.09hal

Heuberger, R. (2008). Anthropocentrism and speciesism in English and German: A comparative lexical study. In M. Döring & W. Trampe (Eds.), Language, signs, and nature: Ecolinguistic dimensions of environmental discourse. Essays in honor of Alwin Fill (pp. 183-193). Stauffenburg.

Jandrić, P., Jaldemark, J., Hurley, Z., Bartram, B., Matthews, A., Jopling, M., Manero, J., MacKenzie, A., Irwin, J., Rothmuller, N., Green, B., Ralston, S. J., Pyyhtinen, O., Hayes, S., Wright, J., Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2021). Philosophy of education in a new key: Who remembers Greta Thunberg? Education and environment after the coronavirus. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(14), 1421-1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1811678

Jung, J., Petkanic, P., Nan, D., & Kim, J. H. (2020). When a girl awakened the world: A user and social message analysis of Greta Thunberg. Sustainability, 12(7), 2707. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072707

Kaushal, S., Dhammi, S., & Guha, A. (2021). Climate crisis and language: A constructivist ecolinguistic approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 49(8), 3581-3584. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.093

Luardini, M. A., Simbolon, M., Luardini, M. A., & Merilyn, S. (2018). Ecolinguistics for teaching English. The Asian ESP Journal, 14(4), 31-41.

Mohamed, M., & Larouz, M. (2020). Print media coverage of environmental issues in the COVID-19 pandemic: An ecolinguistic analysis. Jurnal Arbitrer, 7(2), 182-202. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.7.2.182-202.2020

Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 36-73. http://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0701_02

Poole, S. (2006). Unspeak: How words become weapons, how weapons become a message, and how that message becomes reality. Grove Press.

Roccia, M., & Iubini-Hampton, J. (2021). The stories we live by and the stories we won’t stand by Measuring the impact of a free online course in ecolinguistics. Journal of World Languages, 7(1), 58-79. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0004

Sabherwal, A., Ballew, M. T., van Der Linden, S., Gustafson, A., Goldberg, M. H., Maibach, E. W., Kotcher, J. E., Swim, J. K., Rosenthal, S. A. & Leiserowitz, A. (2021). The Greta Thunberg effect: Familiarity with Greta Thunberg predicts intentions to engage in climate activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(4), 321-333. http://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12737

Sjögren, H. (2020). Longing for the past: An analysis of discursive formations in the Greta Thunberg message. Culture Unbound, 12(3), 615-631. http://doi.org/10.3384/cu.vi0.1796

Skilbeck, A. (2020). ‘A thin net over an abyss’: Greta Thunberg and the importance of words in addressing the climate crisis. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 54(4), 960-974. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12485

Stibbe, A. (2012). Animals erased: Discourse, ecology, and reconnection with the natural world. Wesleyan University Press.

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology, and the stories we live by. Routledge.

Suryaningsih, Y. (2021). A critical discourse analysis of personal pronouns in Greta Thunberg’s speeches. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 55-64. http://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2020.21.34

Thunberg, G. (2019). No one is too small to make a difference. Penguin.

Wu, Y. (2018). Ecological discourse analysis [Paper presentation]. 4th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2018), Sanya, China. http://doi.org/10.2991/icsshe-18.2018.163

Zhou, W. (2021). Ecolinguistics: A half-century overview. Journal of World Languages, 7(3), 461-486. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0022

Zhao, C. Y., & Liu, C. Y. (2020). Ecological study of language and two turns in ecolinguistics. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 22(2), 112-119. http:// doi.org/10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2020.02.015