Analyzing the Readability Level of the English Textbooks Used in Jordan
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language PedagogyRami Abu 1 , Abdullah Khataybeh 2
1 - Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Yarmouk University, Jordan
2 - Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Yarmouk University, Jordan
کلید واژه: Jordan, readability, English textbooks, Action Pack, Fry Graph, Grade 12,
چکیده مقاله :
Because of the significance of the textbooks in the teaching and learning processes, it is essential to revise them permanently. This study investigated the readability level of the 12th- grade English textbooks and also examined if the reading texts used in Action Pack 12 were suitable linguistically for the 12th -grade students. This study adopted the qualitative descriptive design by using the Fry Graph to calculate the readability level. The researchers chose randomly 20 texts out of 36 texts as a sample of the study. The results revealed that 80% out of the 20 texts were under the level of the 12th-grade students in Jordan. Also, the results indicated that 15 % of the texts were invalid and only 5% of the texts were within the 12th-grade students’ level. The findings also indicated that Action Pack 12 was suitable linguistically for 12th-grade students. Several recommendations are put forth.
Abu Sa’aleek, R. A. (2018). The involvement of the twelfth grade English textbook in Jordan: An analytical study. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 2(2), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v2i2.5909.
Al-Awamleh, A., Al-Swailemeen, M., & Al-Sheikh, A. (2010). Readability level of science textbook among the 7th-grade students in Jordan. Journal of Islamic University, 18(2), 805-823.
Al-Khalidi, J. (2013). Readability level of Islamic education textbooks in Jordan. Journal of Al-Azhar University – Gaza, Humanities, 15(1), 1-22.
Begeny, J.C.,& Greene, D.J. (2014). Can readability formulas be used to successfully gauge the difficulty of reading materials? Psychology in the Schools, 51, 198-215.
Burns, B. (2006). I don't have to count syllables on my fingers anymore: Easier ways to find readability and level books. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 34(1), 34-40.
Chiang, W., Englebrecht, T., Phillips, T., & Wang, Y. (2008). Readability of financial accounting principles textbooks. The Accounting Educators’ Journal, 18, 47-80.
Crook, N. M. (1977). A Study of the validity of the Fry readability graph. Journal of Social Studies Research, 1, 53-59.
Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching materials. London: Heinemann.
Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1949). The concept of readability. Elementary English, 26(1), 19-26.
DuBay, W. (2007). Smart language: Readers, readability, and the grading of text. Charleston, SC: BookSurge Publishing.
Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc.
Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516, 575-578.
Gallagher R. L., Fazio X., & Gunning, T. G. (2012). Varying readability of science-based text in elementary readers: Challenges for teachers. Reading Improvement, 49, 92-112.
Geçit, Y. (2010). The evaluation of high school geography 9 and high school geography 11 text books with some formulas of readability. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2205-2220.
Gunning, T. G. (2003). The role of readability in todayʼs classrooms. Topics in Language Disorders, 23(3), 175-189.
Gutierrez, M. (2014). The suitability of the fry and smog readability formulae in determining the readability of Filipino texts. Normal Lights, 8(1), 35-47.
Gyawaji, F., Saddhono, K., & Sulistyo, E.(2017). Fog index on textbooks of Indonesian subject for class X of senior high school in standard based curriculum (Sbc) and curriculum 2013 (A Study of Legibility and Feasibility Textbooks). Proceeding of 2nd International Conference of Arts Language And Culture, 511-522.
Hornby, A. S. (1995). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English. Oxford University Press.
Isnaeni, N. (2013). Readability of English written materials. Journal of English and Literature, 1(1), 179-192.
Ivey, G. (2010). To create lifelong readers, we need to give students reading materials that leave them wanting to know more. Educational Leadership, 67(6), 18-23.
Khataybeh, A., & Sakal, R. (2017). The readability of Action Pack for 7th, 10th and 9th grades. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 22(2), 1-13.
Kondur, J. (2006). Using part of speech structure of the text in the prediction of its readability [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Texas, Arlington, U.S.
Lee, S. (2013). The development of evaluation theories for foreign language textbooks. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 69-89.
McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). SMOG-grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639-646.
Nurhamsih, Y. (2017). The analysis of the readability levels of the reading texts in textbooks entitled fast tract to English for the third year students of SMA based on raygor readability estimate. International Journal of English Language and Teaching, 1(1), 50-75.
Pamungkas, D. A. (2010). The quality of the English textbook used by international standard Junior High school [Unpublished master’s thesis]. The State University of Malang.
Paolo, M. F. (1977). A comparison of readability graph scores and oral reading errors on trade books for beginning reading [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Pelteret, C., Kilbey, L., & Greet, J. (2015). Action Pack 12 twelfth grade: Student’s book. London: York Press.
Pelteret, C., Kilbey, L., & Greet, J. (2015). Action Pack 12 twelfth grade: Activity book. London: York Press.
Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1992). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman.
Rohmatillah, R. (2015). Readability level of reading texts in the English textbook entitled English alive for senior high school grade X. English education. Tadris English, 7(1), 81-104.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1998). Curriculum development theory. New York: Macmillan Book Company.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.
