Using Convergent and Divergent Tasks through Critical Thinking in Writing Classes
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Hamid Marashi
1
,
Rahil Akbar-Hosseini
2
1 - Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
2 - Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
کلید واژه: Convergent tasks, critical thinking, Writing, Divergent tasks,
چکیده مقاله :
This study examined the comparative impacts of convergent and divergent tasks while employing critical thinking techniques on EFL learners’ writing. Accordingly, 60 male and female learners were chosen from a group of 90 learners based on their scores on a sample PET previously piloted in one of Tehran’s language schools. The learners were then randomly put into two experimental groups: 30 learners undergoing convergent tasks and 30 learners receiving divergent tasks. Both groups were exposed to critical thinking techniques. After the treatment, a sample PET writing section was administered as the posttest to both groups with their mean scores being compared; the results showed that neither group outperformed the other significantly. This result probably indicates that the critical thinking instruction was more of an influential factor compared to the variability of convergent and divergent tasks, thereby consolidating further the notion that critical thinking instruction is a highly influential factor in ELT.
Akbari Chehrmahini, S., & Hommel, B. (2012). Creative mood swings: divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychological Research, 76(5), 634-640.
Alagozlu, N. (2007). Critical thinking and voice in EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal 9(3), 118-136.
Astika, G. (2004). A task-based approach to reading English for specialist purposes. EA Journal, 22(2), 22-35.
Azimi, S. A., Behjat, F., & Kargar, A. A. (2016). The impact of divergent and convergent tasks on Iranian EFL students’ reading comprehension success. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 5(1), 17-34.
Bonk, C. J., & Smith, G. S. (1998). Alternative instructional strategies for creative and critical thought in the accounting curriculum. Journal of Accounting Education, 16(2), 261–293.
Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapple, L., & Curtis, A. (2000). Content-based instruction in Hong Kong: Student responses to the film. System, 28, 419-433.
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the
same syntactic representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 185-198.
Cottrell, S. (2011). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave
Cropley, A. J. (2000). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. London: Kogan Page.
Damron, R. L., & High, K. A. (2008). Innovation in linking and thinking: Critical thinking and writing skills of first-year engineering students in a learning community. Paper presented at the 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA.
Duff. A. (1986). How to teach English. London: Longman.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical thinking: Reflection and perspective – Part I. Inquiry, 26(1), 4-18.
Freely, A. J., & Steinberg, D. L. (2000). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision-making. Stamford: Wadsworth.
Gorjian, B., Pazhakh, A., & Parang, K. (2012). An investigation on the effect of critical thinking (CT) instructions on Iranian EFL learners’ descriptive writing: A case of gender study. Advances in Asian Social Science, 1(1), 114-118.
Haji Pour Nejad, G. R., & Shokrpour, N. (2013). The impact of task type and divergent thinking on reading proficiency. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 124-137.
Halvorsen, A. (2005). Incorporating critical thinking skills development into ESL/EFL courses. The Internet TESL Journal, 11(3).
Hedge, T. (2003). Writing resource books for teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to the process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29.
Ismail, S., & Maasum, T. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning in enhancing writing performance. SOLLS INTEC 09 International Conference, Putrajaya, University Kebangsaan, Malaysia.
Khabiri, M, & Firooz, M. (2012). The comparative effect of practicing cooperative learning and critical thinking on EFL learners’ writing. Issues in Language Teaching, 1(2), 371-394.
Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marashi, H., & Jodeiri, S. (2006). On the relationship between the critical thinking ability of Iranian intermediate EFL learners and their writing performance. Proceedings of the First Language and Linguistics Seminar of Islamic Azad University at Central Tehran, 175-192.
Marashi, H., & Noochirwani Tehran, S. (2011). The comparative impact of content-based and task-based teaching in a critical thinking setting on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Studies, 1(4), 27-40.
Marashi, H., & Jafari, R. (2012). The comparative effect of using critical thinking, constructivist learning, and a combination of the two techniques on EFL learners’ writing. Iranian EFL Journal, 8(4), 206-225.
Marashi, H., & Yavarzadeh, E. (2014). Using critical discourse analysis instruction in argumentative and descriptive writing classes. Issues in Language Teaching, 3(2), 209-236.
Marashi, H., & Tahan-Shizari, P. (2015). Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 99-117.
Marashi, H., & Chizari, A. (2016). Using critical discourse analysis based instruction to improve EFL learners’ writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(19), 37-61.
Nosratinia, M., & Kounani, K. (2016). Comparing the impact of divergent and convergent tasks on extrovert and introvert EFL learners’ writing performance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(6), 1305-1314.
Nunan, D. (2005). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining ‘task’. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 12-18.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sendag, S., & Odabas, F. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers and Education, 53(1), 132-141.
Shoarnaghavi, R., Seifoori, Z., & Ghafoori, N. (2014). The impact of divergent tasks on the accuracy and complexity of intermediate Iranian EFL learners’ task-based oral speech. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1762-1770.
Silva, T., & Matsuda, P. K. (2002). Writing. In N. Schmidt (Ed.) An introduction to applied linguistics, (pp. 251-266). London: Arnold.
Skehan, P. (2001). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.
Soars, J., & Soars, L. (2015). American headway. New York: Oxford University Press.
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by a hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-401.
Tsao, Chia-hsiu (2015). Using web-assisted instruction to improve student achievement in English as a foreign language. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 40-59.
