Syntactic Priming Effects on EFL Learners’ Production and Retention of Indirect Questions
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language PedagogyReza Biria 1 , Ahmad Ameri Golestan 2
1 - Department of English, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English, Majlesi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: EFL learners, metaphor, language proficiency, Metaphorical Competence,
چکیده مقاله :
This study examines the impact of syntactic priming on the production and retention of indirect questions by Iranian learners of English as a foreign language (EFL). Eighty learners participated in two experiments investigating the impact of syntactic priming on oral production and retention of indirect questions. Experiment 1 showed that priming resulted in increased production of the target structure by the Experimental groups as compared with production by the Control groups. Experiment 2 showed that the rate of production of the target structure remained significantly higher for participants in the Experimental groups one day later.
Allen, D. (1992). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bernolet,
S., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Pickering, M.J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,33, 931-949. Bock, K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–87
Bock, K. & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 177-92.
Branigan, H. (2007) Syntactic priming. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 1–16. Branigan, H., Pickering, M. J., Liversedge, S. P., Stewart, A. J., & Urbach, T. P. (1995). Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 489–506.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S., Bock, K. & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psy cholinguistic Research, 292, 217–29.
De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt›s ‹Speaking› model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 41, 365-397.
Fisher, C. (2002). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition, 82, 259-278.
Garrod, S. & Clark, A. (1993). The development of dialogue co-ordination skills in schoolchildren. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 101-126.
Gries, S. T. & Wulff, S. (2005). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182-200.
Hartsuiker, R. J. & Kolk, H. H. J. (1998). Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language and Speech, 41, 143-184.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H. J., & Huiskamp,
P. (1999). Priming word order in sentence production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 129- 147.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409-414.
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. (2006). Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming. Cognition, 99, B73–B82.
Kim, Y. & McDonough, K. (2008). Learners’ production of passives during syntactic priming activities. Applied Linguistics, 29/1, 149–154.
Levelt, W. J. M. & Kelter,, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78-106.
Lotf, A. R. (2003). Persian wh-riddles. In Boeckx, C. & Grohmann, K. K., (Eds.), Multiple wh-fronting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McDonough, K. (2006). Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 179-207.
Pickering, M. J. & Ferreira, V. S. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Review, 134 (3), 427-459.
Saffran, E. M. & Martin, N. (1997). Effects of structural priming on sentence pro- duction in aphasics. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 877-882.
Scheepers, C. (2003). Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89, 179-205.
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R.J., & Pickering, M.J. (2007). The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 153-171.
Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 163-196. Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209-253.
Ullman, T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105-122.
Weiner, E. J. & Labov, W. (1983). Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics, 19, 29-58.
Wheeldon, L. R. & Smith, M. C. (2003). Phrases structure priming: A short lived effect. Language and Cognition Processes, 18, 431-442.
