اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی مبتنی بر رویکرد ایماگوتراپی بر کیفیت رابطه زناشویی زنان متأهل
محورهای موضوعی : تربیتیحسین متین 1 , ناصر یوسفی 2 , محیا سلگی 3 , معصومه ارجمند مزیدی 4
1 - داشجوی دکتری مشاوره، گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.
2 - دانشیار گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران.
3 - کارشناس ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.
4 - کارشناس ارشد مشاوره خانواده، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران
کلید واژه: ایماگوتراپی, کیفیت ابعاد رابطه زناشویی, زوج‌درمانی, زنان متأهل,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش باهدف بررسی اثربخشی زوج‌درمانی مبتنی بر رویکرد ایماگوتراپی بر کیفیت رابطه زناشویی زنان انجام گرفت. طرح پژوهش نیمه آزمایشی و از نوع پیش‌آزمون - پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش زنان متأهل دارای تعارض زناشویی مراجعه‌کننده به مراکز مشاوره شهر همدان در سال 1397 بود. برای انتخاب حجم نمونه، 30 زن به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس و هدفمند انتخاب شدند و به‌صورت تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش (15 نفر) و کنترل (15 نفر) قرار داده شدند. گروه آزمایشی به مدت 8 جلسه درمان هفتگی 90 دقیقه‌ای تحت درمان قرار گرفت و گروه گواه طی این مدت هیچ مداخله‌ای دریافت نکرد. جهت جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از مقیاس کیفیت ابعاد رابطه زناشویی (PRQC) استفاده شد. داده ها با استفاده از تحلیل کوواریانس چندمتغیری (مانکو) تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد که زوج‌درمانی ایماگوتراپی در افزایش معنادار کیفیت ابعاد رابطه زناشویی و تمام شش خرده‌مقیاس‌های آن (رضایت از رابطه، اعتماد، تعهد، شور و هیجان جنسی، صمیمیت و عشق) تاثیر داشته است (05/0>P).
This study was conducted aimed at investigating the effect of couple therapy based Imago Relationship Therapy (IRT) on quality of marital relationship in married women. The research method was semi-experimental (pre-test -post-test with control group). The statistical population of this study was married women with marital conflict referring to Hamedan counseling centers in 2018. To select the sample size, 30 women were selected through convenience and purposeful sampling and were randomly assigned into two experimental (15 member) and control (15 member) groups. the experimental group received treatment for 8 sessions of a 90-minute weekly treatment, and the control group received no intervention during this period. To collect data, the instrument of perceived Relationship Quality Components (PRQC) were employed. The collected data was analyzed using multivariate covariance. Based on the results of multivariable covariance analysis of data, it can be said that Imago Relationship Therapy significantly increases the quality of marital relationship dimensions and all six sub-scales (satisfaction of relationship, trust, commitment, passion and love, intimacy and love) have been made (P<0/05).
Arianfar, N, & Rasouli, R (2018). The comparison of emotionally focused couple therapy with marital enrichment program on the marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 7(2), 3-26. [Persian].
Aslani, kh, & Rajabi, Gh. (2016). Effectiveness of imago therapy on marital quality among referred couples to the Behbahan counseling centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(36), 37-53. [Persian].
Ashley, A. A. (2015). Discover a New Way to Love in 2015. Carole Kirly.
Beeton, T.A. (2005). Dyadic Adjustment and Use of Imago Skills Past Participants of the “Getting the Love You Want” Workshop for Couples. Unpublished doctoral. Dissertation Walden University.
Byers, E. (2005). Relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction: a longitudinal study of individuals in long-term relationships. Journal of Sex Res, 42(2), 113-118.
Berger, R. & Hanna, M. T. (2013).Preventive Approaches in Couples Therapy.Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis group.
Ito, Y., & Sagara, J. (2016). Marital commitment between couples in child-rearing period and in middle-aged and elderly period. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 618.
Casado-Kihoe, M. & Carson, D. K. (2011). Case studies in couple therapy. New York: Taylor and Francis group, LLC.
Duba, J. D. Hughey, A. W. Lara, T., & Burke, M. G. (2012). Areas of marital dissatisfaction among long-term couples. Adult span Journal, 11(1), 39-54.
Fletcher, G. J. Simpson, J. A. & Thomas, G. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340-354.
Gehlerta, N. C, Schmidtb, CH. D. Giegerichc,V. & Luquet,W. (2017). Randomized controlled trial of imago relationship therapy: exploring statistical and clinical significance. John Carroll University. Carroll Collected. Faculty Bibliography.17,187-209.
Hasson-Ohayon, I., Ben-Pazi, A., Silberg, T., Pijnenborg, G. H., & Goldzweig, G. (2019). The mediating role of parental satisfaction between marital satisfaction and perceived family burden among parents of children with psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry research, 271, 105-110.
Hendrix, H., Hunt, H. L. Luquet, W, & Carlson, J. (2015). Using the imago dialogue to deepen couples therapy. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71, 253–272.
Hendrix, H, & Hunt, HL. (2013). Making marriage simple: 10 truths for changing the relationship you have into the one you want. New York: Crown Archetype.
Hendrix, H. (2008). Getting the love you want: A guide for couples. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.
Hoshyar, P., Nazary, A. M., Zahrakar, K, & Poormalek, M, M. (2015). Comparison of Marital Quality of Life among Housewives and Employed Women of Tehran City. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research. 4(1), 53-57 .
John, N. A., Seme, A., Roro, M. A., & Tsui, A. O. (2017). Understanding the meaning of marital relationship quality among couples in peri-urban Ethiopia. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19(2), 267-278.
Lavner, J. A. Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples' communication pridict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction pridict communication? Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680-694.
Lankveld,J., V.,Jacobs, N., Thewissen, V., Dewitte, M., &Verboon, P. (2018). The associations of intimacy and sexuality in daily life: Temporal dynamics and gender effects within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(4),557–576.
Luquet, W, & Muro, L. (2018). Imago Relationship Therapy Alignment With Marriage and Family Common Factors. The Family Journal, 26(4), 405-410.
Luquet, w. (2007). Short-term couples therapy: the Imago model in action.
Matin, H, & Hayati, M. (2018). The Effectiveness of Imago relationship therapy group training on Defensive Mechanisms and Women's Problems. Quarterly of Counseling Culture and Psychotherapy, 8(32), 63-87. [Persian].
Muro, L. Holliman, R, & Luquet, W. (2015). Imago relationship therapy and accurate empathy development. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy.
Martin, T. L. &Bielawski, D. M. (2011).What Is the African American’s Experience Following Imago Education? Journal of Humanistic Psychology.51, 216-228.
Miller, R. B. Yorganson, J. B., Sandberg, J. G., &White, M. B. (2003). Problems that Couple bring to therapy: A View across the family life cycle. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(5), 395-407.
Mosavian, E., & Bayrani, M. (2015). The relationships between commitment and intimacy of couple. Journal of Psycology and Behavioural Research, 1(5): 62- 71.
McNulty, J. K. Wenner, C. A. & Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 85–97.
Mesbah, I. (2019). A Study on the Relationship between components of love and marital satisfaction among married students of Male & Female. journal of Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi, 8(1), 21-30. [Persian].
Nilforooshan, P., Ahmadi, A., Fatehizadeh, M., Abedi, M. R, & Ghasemi, V. (2014). The Simultaneous Effects of General Factor of Personality and Attachment Dimensions on Marital Quality. counseling and Family psychotherapy, 4(3), 473-507. [Persian].
Rose, A., Anderson, S., Miller, R., Marks, L., Hatch, T., & Card, N. (2019). Longitudinal Test of Forgiveness and Perceived Forgiveness as Mediators between Religiosity and Marital Satisfaction in Long-Term Marital Relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 1-19.
Sadat Fatemi, M., Karbalai, A., Meygoni, M., Kakavand, A. (2015). The effect of imago therapy on marital intimacy among couples. Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology. 17(1): 51-9. [Persian].
Song, J,A. (2006). Validity of imago couple therapy's contents and effects of application of the imago couple therapy. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association. 44(4); 44, 87-99.
Shakarami, M., Davarniya, R., Zahrakar, K, & Talaeian, R. (2015). Effectiveness of brief solution-focused group couple therapy on improving marital quality in women. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences, 22(131), 1-13. [Persian].
Shafiee, Z, & Mohamadi, R. (2018). Forecast The quality of marital relationship based on the dimensions of emotional intelligence in married men and women and their spouses. Scientific journal of the womenand families cultural-educational, 12(41), 91-106. [Persian].
Schmidt, C. Luquet, W. & Gehlert, N. (2015). Evaluating the impact of the Getting the Love You Want Couples workshop on relational satisfaction and communication patterns. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 1-18.
Sheydanfar, N., Navabinejad, S, & Farzad, V. (2018). Comparing the effectiveness of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy (EFCT) and Imago Relation Therapy (IRT) in couple’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 4(2), 75-88. [Persian].
Tilghman-Osborne, C., Cole, D. A., Felton, J. W., & Ciesla, J. A. (2008). Relation of guilt, shame, behavioral and character logical self-blame to depressive symptoms in adolescents over time. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 27(8), 809–842.
Weigle, J. B. (2006). The effect of participating in an Imago therapy workshop on marital satisfaction. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Vowels, L. M. & Mark, K. P. (2018). Relationship and sexual satisfaction: a longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model approach. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 1-14.
Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R., & Gangamma, R. (2013).Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 40(4), 275-293.
_||_
