• صفحه اصلی
  • تحلیلی بر روش‌های سنجش آسیب‌پذیری در محیط‌زیست ساحلی

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 6315 بازدید : 141 صفحه: 41 - 62

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

تحلیلی بر روش‌های سنجش آسیب‌پذیری در محیط‌زیست ساحلی

محورهای موضوعی : آب و محیط زیست

طهورا دهشور 1 , افشین دانه کار 2 , مسعود منوری 3 , برهان ریاضی 4 , مسعود خیرخواه زرکش 5

1 - دانشجوی دکتری محیط‌زیست، گروه ارزیابی و آمایش محیط‌زیست، دانشکده محیط‌زیست و انرژی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانشیارگروه محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران، واحد کرج.
3 - استادیار گروه ارزیابی و برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی، دانشکده محیط زیست و انرژی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران
4 - استادیار گروه تنوع زیستی، دانشکده محیط زیست و انرژی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران
5 - استادیار گروه GIS و سنجش از راه دور، دانشگده محیط زیست و انرژی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران

تاریخ دریافت : 1392/02/25 تاریخ پذیرش : 1392/08/09 تاریخ انتشار : 1393/01/01

کلید واژه: مناطق ساحلی, تنش, آسیب‌پذیری, محیط‌زیست ساحلی, مناطق حساس ساحلی,

چکیده مقاله :

این تحقیق تلاش دارد ضمن انعکاس سوابق و رویه های نوین تعیین آسیب پذیری و تنش هایی که منجر به ایجاد آسیب پذیری در محیط های طبیعی و بویژه مناطق ساحلی می شوند، مناسب ترین رویکرد را برای تصمیم گیری مدیریتی مناطق ساحلی پیشنهاد نماید. این مطالعه با تحلیل 49 تحقیق در خصوص تعیین میزان آسیب پذیری (70% مربوط به مناطق ساحلی)، 69 تحقیق در ارتباط با بررسی تنش ها حدود (70% ساحلی) و 10 تحقیق در ارتباط با بررسی منابع و مناطق حساس ساحلی به انجام رسید. این بررسی نشان داد در میان روش های مختلف تعیین آسیب پذیری پرکاربردترین روش، روش CVI [1] است، در محاسبه این روش هم متغیرها و هم تنش ها دخیل هستند. از میان تنش ها بالا آمدن سطح آب دریا و تغییرات تراز آب بیش از سایر تنش ها در پژوهش های صورت گرفته مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است، اما برخی تنش های دیگر مانند باران های نامنظم و کمیاب، سدسازی و برخی تنش های دیگر فقط در یک پژوهش مورد استفاده قرارگرفته اند؛ بنابراین می توان نتیجه گرفت تنش هایی که بیش تر مورد استفاده قرار گرفته اند اهمیت بیش تری برای محاسبه آسیب پذیری دارند. همچنین در بین منابع حساسیت در قسمت اکولوژیک معیار بکر بودن (طبیعی بودن) و در قسمت غیراکولوژیک معیار اقتصادی (زیر معیار وابستگی اقتصادی و منافع) بیش ترین درصد فراوانی را داراست، بنابراین این منابع حساسیت که در پژوهش مختلف بیش تر مورد استفاده قرار گرفته اند برای محاسبه حساسیت، اهمیت فراوان تری دارند. 6- Coastal Vulnerability Index

چکیده انگلیسی:

This research wants to reflect the results and methods of pervious researches in natural places and coastal areas and tries to find best method for decision making in coastal areas of Iran. This research has been done by investigating 49 researches about vulnerability which 70% of them were about vulnerability evaluation in coastal areas and 69 researches was about the stresses and 10 researches was about sensitive areas. Among various methods the most useful method is CVI. In this method both variables and stresses are used.  This survey also showed that sees level rise is the most used stress and Irregular and scarce rainfall and construction of dams is tow stresses that used only in one research. So stresses that used more than the others are more important. The survey also showed that among sensitivity resources, ecological criteria and economical criteria have the highest frequency. So for calculating sensitivity each sensitivity resources that used more than the others are more important

منابع و مأخذ:

 

  1. Yoo, G et al., 2011. Development and application of a methodology for vulnerability assessment of climate change in coastal cities. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54, pp.524-534
    2.
  2. Srinivasa Kumar, T., et al., 2010. Coastal Vulnerability Assessment for Orissa State, East Coast of India. Journal of Coastal Research, 26(3), pp.523–534
    3.
  3. Adger, W. N, 2006. Vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16, pp268–281
    4.
  4. Gallopın, Gilberto C., 2006, Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16, pp.293–303
    5.
  5. IMO/MEPC 46/23. 2001. Guidelines for the identification and design nation of particularly sensitive sea areas. ANNEX 6, Jan
    6.
  6. Angelidis, M and Kamizoulis, G, 2005. A Rapid Decision-Making Method for the Evaluation of Pollution-Sensitive Coastal Areas in the Mediterranean Sea. Environmental Management, 35(6), pp. 811-820
    7.
  7. Lures, A., et al., 2003. A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 13, pp. 255–267
    8.
  8. Szlafsztein, C, and Sterr, H, 2007. A GIS-based vulnerability assessment of coastal natural hazards, state of Pará, Brazil. J Coast Conserv, 11, pp.53–66
    9.
  9. Gravelle, G and Mimura, N, 2008. Vulnerability assessment of sea-level rise in Viti Levu, Fiji Islands. Sustain Sci, 3, pp.171–180
    10.
  10.  Nageswara Rao, K., et al., 2008. Sea-level rise and coastal vulnerability: an assessment of Andhra Pradesh coast, India through remote sensing and GIS. J Coast Conserv, 12, pp.195–207
    11.
  11.  Wang, X.D., et al., 2008. Regional assessment of environmental vulnerability in the Tibetan Plateau: Development and application of a new method. Journal of Arid Environments, 72, pp.1929– 1939
    12.
  12.  Almasri, N., 2008. Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability to contamination for Gaza coastal aquifer, Palestine. Journal of Environmental Management, 88,  pp. 577–593
    13.
  13.  Hinkel,J, Klein, R J.T., 2009. Integrating knowledge to assess coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise: The development of the DIVA tool. Global Environmental Change, 19, pp.384–395
    14.
  14.  Dwarakish, G.S, et al., 2009. Coastal vulnerability assessment of the future sea level rise in Udupi coastal zone of Karnataka state, west coast of India. Ocean & Coastal Management, 52, pp. 467–478
    15.
  15.  Li, L, et al., 2009. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Ecological Modelling, 220, pp. 3439–3447
    16.
  16.  Kattaa, B, et al., 2010. Groundwater vulnerability assessment for the Banyas Catchment of the Syrian coastal area using GIS and the RISKE method. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, pp. 1103–1110
    17.
  17.  Copeland,  H. et al.,2010, A geospatial assessment on the distribution, condition, and vulnerability of Wyoming’s wetlands, Ecological Indicators, 10, pp 869–879
    18.
  18.  Tran, T. Liem., et al., 2010. Spatial pattern of environmental vulnerability in the Mid-Atlantic region, USA. Applied Geography, 30, pp. 191–202
    19.
  19.  Mustelin, J., et al., 2010. Understanding current and future vulnerability in coastal settings: community perceptions and preferences for adaptation in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Popul Environ, 31, pp.371–398
    20.
  20. Andrade, M, et al., 2010. A socioeconomic and natural vulnerability index for oil spills in an Amazonian harbor: A case study using GIS and remote sensing. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, pp. 1972-1980
    21.
  21.  Sheik Mujabar, P. and Chandrasekar, N., 2011. Coastal erosion hazard and vulnerability assessment for southern coastal Tamil Nadu of India by using remote sensing and GIS. Nat Hazards, 14(4), pp. 282-293
    22.
  22.  Mahendra, R.S., et al., 2011. Assessment and management of coastal multi-hazard vulnerability along the Cuddalore-Villupuram, east coast of India using geospatial techniques. Ocean & Coastal Management, 54, pp.302-311
    23.
  23.  Sinaga, T. P. T., et al., 2011. GIS Mapping of Tsunami Vulnerability: Case Study of the Jembrana Regency in Bali, Indonesia. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 15(3), pp.537-543
    24.
  24.  Furlan, A., et al., 2011. Development of environmental and natural vulnerability maps for Brazilian coastal at Sa˜o Sebastia˜o in Sa˜o Paulo State. Environ Earth Sci, 64, pp.659–669
    25.
  25.  Khoshravan, H and Barimani, H, 2012. Seismic vulnerability, Caspian Sea southern coast. Quaternary International, 261, pp.9-13
    26.
  26.  Sousa, P, et al., 2012. Vulnerability assessment of Massaguaçú Beach (SE Brazil). Ocean & Coastal Management, 77, pp.24-30
    27.
  27.  Eckert, S, et al., 2012. Remote sensing-based assessment of tsunami vulnerability and risk in Alexandria, Egypt. Applied Geography, 32, pp 714-723
    28.
  28.  Yin, J, et al., 2012. National assessment of coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise for the Chinese coast. J Coast Conserv, 16, pp.123–133
    29.
  29. Frihy, O., and El-Sayed, M., 2012. Vulnerability risk assessment and adaptation to climate change induced sea level rise along the Mediterranean coast of Egypt, Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change,
    30.
  30.  Hassaan, M. A., and Abdrabo, M. A., 2012. Vulnerability of the Nile Delta coastal areas to inundation by sea level rise. Environ Monit Assess, 185(8), pp.6607-6616
    31.
  31.  Usha, T, et al., 2012. Tsunami vulnerability assessment in urban areas using numerical model and GIS. Nat Hazards, 60, pp.135–147
    32.
  32.  Arun Kumar, A. and Kunte, P., 2012. Coastal vulnerability assessment for Chennai, east coast of India using geospatial techniques. Nat Hazards, 64, pp.853-872
    33.
  33.  Farhan,A.R. and Lim,S., 2012. Vulnerability assessment of ecological conditions in Seribu Islands, Indonesia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 65, pp.1-14
    34.
  34.  Santos, C, et al., 2013. Quantitative assessment of the differential coastal vulnerability associated to oil spills. J Coast Conserv, 17, pp.25–36
    35.
  35.  Cooper, H., et al., 2013. Assessing vulnerability due to sea-level rise in Maui, Hawai‘i using LiDAR remote sensing and GIS. Climatic Change, 116, pp.547–563
    36.
  36. سعید صبایی، مریم و همکاران، بازبینی حریم قانونی سواحل دریای خزر به سبب تغییرات تراز آب دریا مطالعه نمونه : گیلان، آمایش سرزمین،1390، 4، ص136-115

    1. Antonakos, A.K. and Lambrakis, N.J., 2007. Development and testing of three hybrid methods for the assessment of aquifer vulnerability to nitrates, based on the drastic model, an example from NE Korinthia, Greece. Journal of Hydrology, 333, pp.288– 304
      2.
    2. Kaynia, A.M., et al., 2008. Probabilistic assessment of vulnerability to landslide: Application to the village of Lichtenstein, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Engineering Geology, 101, pp.33–48
      3.
    3.   Castanedo, S., et al., 2009. Oil spill vulnerability assessment integrating physical, biological and socio-economical aspects: Application to the Cantabrian coast (Bay of Biscay, Spain). Journal of Environmental Management, 91, pp.149–159
      4.
    4.  Abuodha, P and Woodroffe, C., 2010. Assessing vulnerability to sea-level rise using a coastal sensitivity index: a case study from southeast Australia, J Coast Conserv. 14, pp.189–205
      5.
    5.  Skondras, N, et al., 2011. Application and assessment of the Environmental Vulnerability Index in Greece. Ecological Indicators, 11, pp.1699-1706
      6.
    6.  Bjarnadottir, S, et al., 2011. Social vulnerability index for coastal communities at risk to hurricane hazard and a changing climate. Nat Hazards, 59, pp.1055–1075
      7.
    7.  Balica, S. F., et al., 2012. A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Nat Hazards, 64, pp.73–105
      8.
    8.  Tran, T., et al., 2012. A watershed-based method for environmental vulnerability assessment with a case study of the Mid-Atlantic region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, pp.58-64
      9.
    9.  Cinner, J. E., et al., 2012. Vulnerability of coastal communities to key impacts of climate change on coral reef fisheries. Global Environmental Change, 22, pp.12-20
      10.
    10.  Das, A, et al., 2012. Vulnerability assessment using hazard potency for regions generating industrial hazardous waste. Journal of Hazardous Materials 209– 210, pp.308– 317
      11.
    11. شمسی پور، علی اکبر و شیخی، محمد،  پهنه بندی مناطق حساس و آسیب پذیری محیطی در ناحیه غرب فارس، با روش طبقه بندی فازی و فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی، پژوهش های جغرافیای طبیعی، 1389،شماره 73 ، ص68-53

      1. Smit, B., and Wandel, J, 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16, pp.282–292
        2.
      2. صفائیان،نصرت الله و همکاران،، تعیین آسیب پذیری اکولوژیک اکوسیستم های حاشیه جنوب دریای خزر، محیط شناسی، 1377، شماره 29

        1. Wang, X., et al., 2012. Water Resources Vulnerability Assessment based on the Parametric-system Method: a Case Study of the Zhangjiakou Region of Guanting Reservoir Basin. North China, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 8, pp.1231–1239
          2.
        2. Farzipour Saein, A and Farzipoor Saen, R, 2012. Assessment of the site effect vulnerability within urban regions by data envelopment analysis: A case study in Iran. Computers & Geosciences, 48, pp. 280–288
          3.
        3. Bunce, M, et al., 2010,. Policy misfits, climate change and cross-scale vulnerability in coastal Africa: how development projects undermine resilience. environmental science & policy, 13, pp. 485–497
          4.
        4. Chu-Agor, M. L., et al., 2011. Exploring vulnerability of coastal habitats to sea level rise through global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, pp. 593-604
          5.
        5. شریف زادگان،محمدحسین و فتحی،حمید،  ارزیابی آسیب پذیری زیست محیطی برای برنامه ریزی منطقه ای در حوزه های سه گانه زیست محیطی البرز به روش سلسله مراتبی، علوم محیطی،1384، 10، ص20-1

          1. Simeoni, U, and Corbau, C, 2009. Coastal vulnerability related to sea-level rise. Geomorphology, 107, pp1-2
            2.
          2. Varis,O., et al., 2012, Ten major rivers in monsoon Asia-Pacific: An assessment of vulnerability, 32, pp.441-454
            3.
          3. Alpar, B, 2008. Vulnerability of Turkish coasts to accelerated sea-level rise. Geomorphology, 107, pp.58–63
            4.
          4. Ceia, F, et al., 2010. Coastal vulnerability in barrier islands: The high risk areas of the Ria Formosa (Portugal) system. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53, pp. 478-486
            5.
          5. Nicholls, R., et al., 2008. Climate change and coastal vulnerability assessment: scenarios for integrated assessment. Sustain Sci, 3, pp.89–102
            6.
          6. Chust, G, et al., 2009. Human impacts overwhelm the effects of sea-level rise on Basque coastal habitats (N Spain) between 1954 and 2004, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science, 84, pp.453–462
            7.
          7. Mitsova, D., et al., 2012. Using enhanced dasymetric mapping techniques to improve the spatial accuracy of sea level rise vulnerability assessments. J Coast Conserv, 16, pp.355–372
            8.
          8. Jabed Abdul Naser Bhuiyan, Md. and Dutta, D., 2012. Analysis of flood vulnerability and assessment of the impacts in coastal zones of Bangladesh due to potential sea-level rise. Nat Hazards, 61, pp.729–743
            9.
          9. Parkinson, R. and McCue, T., 2011. Assessing municipal vulnerability to predicted sea level rise: City of Satellite Beach, Florida. Climatic Change, 107, pp.203–223
            10.
          10. Demirkesen, A., et al., 2008. Quantifying coastal inundation vulnerability of Turkey to sea-level rise. Environ Monit Assess, 138, pp.101–106
            11.
          11. Marfai, M. and King, L., 2008. Potential vulnerability implications of coastal inundation due to sea level rise for the coastal zone of Semarang city, Indonesia. Environ Geol, 54, pp.1235–1245
            12.
          12. Nuno Martins, V., et al., 2012. Modelling of coastal vulnerability in the stretch between the beaches of Porto de Mós and Falésia, Algarve (Portugal). J Coast Conserv, 16, pp.503–510
            13.
          13.  Gabriel, A. O. and Kreutzwiser, R. D., 2000. Conceptualizing Environmental Stress: A Stress–Response Model of Coastal Sandy Barriers. Environmental Management, 25(1), pp. 53–69
            14.
          14.  Snoussi, M., et al., 2008. Vulnerability assessment of the impact of sea-level rise and flooding on the Moroccan coast: The case of the Mediterranean eastern zone, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science, 77, pp. 206-213
            15.
          15.  Zou, L., and Wei, Y., 2010. Driving factors for social vulnerability to coastal hazards in Southeast Asia: results from the meta-analysis. Nat Hazards, 54, pp.901–929
            16.
          16. Munji, C., et al, 2013. Vulnerability to coastal flooding and response strategies: The case of settlements in Cameroon mangrove forests. Environmental Development, 5, pp.54–72
            17.
          17.  Dutta,   D., et al., 2011. Synthetic impact response functions for flood vulnerability analysis and adaptation measures in coastal zones under changing climatic conditions: a case study in Gippsland coastal region, Australia. Nat Hazards, 59, pp.967–986
            18.
          18.  Das, S., 2012. The role of natural ecosystems and socio-economic factors in the vulnerability of coastal villages to cyclone and storm surge. Nat Hazards, 64, pp.531–546
            19.
          19.  Brakenridge, G. R., et al., 2012. Global mapping of storm surges and the assessment of coastal vulnerability. Nat Hazards, 66(3), pp. 1295-1312
            20.
          20.  Omira, R., et al., 2010. Tsunami vulnerability assessment of Casablanca- Morocco using numerical modelling and GIS tools. Nat Hazards, 54, pp.75–95
            21.
          21.  Anfuso, G., and Pozo, 2009. Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability Through the Use of GIS Tools in South Sicily (Italy). Environmental Management, 43, pp.533–545
            22.
          22.  Cochard, R., et al., 2008. The 2004 tsunami in Aceh and Southern Thailand: A review on coastal ecosystems, wave hazards and vulnerability, Perspectives in Plant Ecology. Evolution and Systematics, 10, pp.3–40
            23.
          23.  IUCN/WCPA. 1999. Guidelines for Marine Protected Areas. Edited & coordinated by Graeme Kelleher
            24.
          24.  NOAA, 2002. Environmental Sensitivity Index Guidelines, Version3,National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administation
            25.
          25. دانه کار، افشین، مجنونیان، هنریک، معیارهای پیشنهادی برای ارزیابی مناطق ساحلی- دریایی ایران به منظور تحسین مناطق تحت حفاظت ساحلی- دریایی ایران، مطالعه موردی: ترازیابی مناطق تحت حفاظت سواحل دریای خزر، فصلنامه محیط شناسی،1383، شماره 35، پائیز، ص 9-32.

            1.  Salm, R.V. and Price, A., 1995. Selection of Marine Protected Areas: Principles of Techniques for Management, Edited by Susan Gubby Chapman and Hall, London
              2.
            2.  Roberts, C., and Hawkins, J., 2000. Fully-protected marine reserves: a guide, WWF, Endangered Seas Campaign
              3.
            3. Guidelines for the Identification and Selection of Marine Protected Areas in the OSPAR Maritime Area, 2003. OSPAR Convention for the protection of the Marine environment of the North-East Atlantic, ANNEX 10, JUNE.
              4.
            4. Overview of Scientific findings and criteria relevant to identifying Spamis in the Mediterranean open seas including the deep sea, 2010. Mediterranean Action plan, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Istanbul, Turkey.
              5.
            5. ASEAN (The Association of Southeast Asian Nations) criteria for National Marine Protected Areas, 2010. (www.aseansec.org)
              6.
            6. ASEAN (The Association of Southeast Asian Nations) Criteria for Marine Heritage Areas, 2010. (www.aseansec.org)
              7.






 



 

 

سکوی نشر دانش

سند یا سکوی نشر دانش ،سامانه ای جهت مدیریت حوزه علمی و پژوهشی نشریات دانشگاه آزاد می باشد

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]