شناسایی اصول و تدوین مدل بازآفرینی محله با رویکرد پایداری اجتماعی با بهره‌گیری از روش دلفی
محورهای موضوعی : شهرسازیماندانا ملک 1 , علیرضا عندلیب 2 , زهرا سادات سعیده زرآبادی 3 , حمید ماجدی 4
1 - دانشجوی دکترای شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
3 - دانشیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
4 - استاد گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: محلات ناکارآمد شهری, پایداری اجتماعی, بازآفرینی محله,
چکیده مقاله :
پایداری اجتماعی یکی از ابعاد سه گانه توسعه پایدار و بازآفرینی یکی از متأخرترین رویکردهای مواجهه با مسائل و مشکلات محلات شهری، است. هدف این مقاله، تبیین ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های بازآفرینی محلات شهری و اصول کلان و سیاست های پشتیبان آن با رویکرد ارتقاء پایداری اجتماعی است. روش تحقیق، بر مبنای مطالعات اسنادی بوده، ضمن بهره گیری از روش دلفی، با استفاده از دیدگاه خبرگان، امتیاز دهی به 4 بعد و 21 عامل مستخرج از مبانی نظری انجام، تحلیل و مدل بازآفرینی محله با رویکرد پایداری اجتماعی ارائه‌شده است. یافته های تحقیق حاکی از آن است اصول تبیین شده بازآفرینی محلات شهری با رویکرد پایداری اجتماعی در قالب چهار دسته کالبد و محیط‌زیست پایدار، اجتماع پایدار، اقتصاد پایدار و حکمروایی صورت‌بندی شده است. درنهایت سیاست های 32 گانه پشتیبان در راستای تحقق پایداری اجتماعی در فرآیند بازآفرینی محله و مدل پیشنهادی که ترتیب عامل‌های هر بعد آن معنی‌دار است، ارائه شد
Declined urban neighborhoods are those parts of cities that failed to establish a balanced economic, social, and functional relationship with the rest of the city during the industrialization and urban development process. Indicators of urban poverty and deteriorated quality of life are visible in such neighborhoods. Actually these declined areas do not have the ability to compete or exchange economic, social or cultural benefits with other part of cities and other urban areas without government support. Social sustainability is a manifestation of sustainable development, which in recent years has gained increased recognition as a fundamental component of sustainable development, beginning to receive political and institutional endorsement within the sustainable development agenda, and the sustainable urban regeneration discourse.Moreover, regeneration is considered as one of the most significant, most effective approaches to improve and renovate urban neighborhoods. Urban regeneration tackles "quality of life" issues in communities through working to narrow the gap between the most disadvantaged neighborhoods and the rest of society. In this policy debate often an areabased approach, integrating horizontal policies, with sustainable perspectives, collaborative inhabitants, is advocated. The aim of this analytical review is to establish the dimensions and components of urban community regeneration, its substantial principles, and supporting policies with an eye on social sustainability, and its conceptual framework. In line with its goals, this policy study is a library and document research involving content analysis of theoretical texts. Furthermore, drawing on the Delphi method and based on a conceptual model, an analysis concerned with community regeneration was carried out assuming a social sustainability approach.Also, the opinion of experts rating 4 aspects and 21 factors derived from theoretical principles were used to finalize the community regeneration model.The findings are suggesting that the principles extracted from an initial literature review comprised social participation, social capital, social composition, social coherence, sustainable policy (governance), welfare and quality of life, the environment, services and housing, preserving the identity and cultural heritage, security and wellbeing, being community-based, and equal access (to housing, services, open spaces, jobs, resources, etc.) can be classified into four groups (sustainable environment and space, sustainable community, sustainable economy, and governance). Of the 21 factors identified through the literature review, and according to the experts’ opinions, the sense of belonging, sustainable transportation, and information systems are the essential criteria, whereas the remaining ones except resilience received an acceptable score in the hierarchy of the criteria. Based on the nine principles extracted in this study, a conceptual model was presented in whose aspects the factors feature a significant order. At the conclusion this article presented, 32 supporting policies which can be used in the process of neighborhood regeneration in order to improve social sustainability. Concurrent attention to these strategies as a balanced set of issues is important. Because the fulfillment of each policy without considering the others will complicate the situation of the declined neighborhood and its local community. Moreover involvement of local communities during the process, is the key success point of the neighborhood regeneration programs.
بحرینی، حسین؛ ایزدی، محمدسعید؛ و مفیدی، مهرانوش. (1392). رویکردها و سیاستهای نوسازی شهری (از بازسازی تا بازآفرینی شهری پایدار). مطالعات شهری، (9)، 30-17.
پیران، پرویز. (1396). معرفی مفاهیم پیشاهنگ؛ کتاب دوم: محله. تهران: شرکت مادر تخصصی عمران و بهسازی شهری ایران.
شیعه، اسماعیل؛ دانشپور، سیدعبدالهادی؛ و روستا، مریم. (1396). تدوین مدل شاخصهای مکانی پایداری اجتماعی به کمک روش دلفی و تکنیک شانون. معماری و شهرسازی آرمان‌شهر، (19)، 129-119.
عالیزاده، عبدالرضا؛ فخرایی، مرضیه؛ و کیقبادی، مرضیه. (1393). نگاهی به روش‌های آینده‌پژوهی: معرفی شش تکنیک مهم و پرکاربرد در آینده‌پژوهی.آینده‌پژوه.
قدمی، مصطفی؛ تولایی، سیمین؛ و فاطمی، محمدمهدی. (1389). ارزیابی استراتژیک قابلیتهای توسعه گردشگری: مطالعه موردی شهر فریدون‌کنار. تحقیقات کاربردی علوم اجتماعی، (19)، 128-111.
Boussaa, D. (2017). Urban Regeneration and the Search for Identity in Historic Cities. Sustainability, 10(1), 48-64.
Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2006). What is ‘social sustainability’, and how do our existing urban forms perform in nurturing it. Proceeding of the Sustainable Communities and Green Futures’ Conference. April 5. London: Bartlett School of Planning, University College London.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Chan, E., & Lee, G. K. (2008). Critical factors for improving social sustainability of urban renewal projects. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 243-256.
Colantonio, A. (2007). Social sustainability: an exploratory analysis of its definition, assessment methods metrics and tools. Oxford Brooks University. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD).
Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2011). Urban regeneration and social sustainability: Best practice from European cities. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Couch, C., Fraser, C., & Percy, S. (2008). Urban regeneration in Europe. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Deakin, M. (2009). A community-based approach to sustainable urban regeneration. Journal of Urban Technology, 16(1), 91-112.
Deakin, M. (2012). The case for socially inclusive visioning in the community-based approach to sustainable urban regeneration. Sustainable Cities and Society, 3, 13-23.
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable development, 19(5), 289-300.
DFID (Department for international development), (2002). Indicators for Socially Sustainable Development, Retrieved 2017 from http://www.livelihood.org/info/docs/wssd-indbr.pdf.
Galster, G. (2001). On the nature of the neighborhood, Urban studies, 38(12), 2111-2124.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of business ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71.
Harris, C., McLaughlin, W., Brown, G., & Becker, D. R. (2000). Rural communities in the inland Northwest: an assessment of small rural communities in the interior and upper Columbia River basins. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report PNW.
Hemphill, L., Berry, J., & McGreal, S. (2004). An indicator-based approach to measuring sustainable urban regeneration performance: part 1, conceptual foundations and methodological framework. Urban Studies, 41(4), 725-755.
Horik, M, B. (2017). Rotterdam as a Flexible City. Unpublished master’s thesis, Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication, Rotterdam.
Hull, A. (2006). Facilitating structures for neighbourhood regeneration in the UK: the contribution of the Housing Action Trusts. Urban studies, 43(12), 2317-2350.
Hutchins, M. J., & Sutherland, J. W. (2008). An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1688-1698.
Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban studies, 37(5-6), 995-1017.
Landry, C. (2012). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. London: Routledge.
Lawson, L, Kearns, A. (2014). Rethinking the purpose of community empowerment in neighbourhood regeneration: the need for policy clarity. Local Economy, 29(1-2), 65–81.
Leary, M. E., & McCartyy, J. (2013). The Routledge companion to urban regeneration. London:Routledge.
Lehtonen, M. (2004). The environmental–social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecological economics, 49(2), 199-214.
Lichfield, D. (2010). Integrated evaluation of regeneration plans. Journal of Urban Regeneration &Renewal, 4(2), 126-134.
Littig, B., &Grießler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International journal of sustainable development, 8(1-2), 65-79.
Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society and Natural Resources, 23(5), 401-416.
Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Jones, T. L., & Allen, J. (Eds). (2010). Social sustainability in urban areas: Communities, connectivity and the urban fabric. Routledge.
ODPM, (2006). UK Presidency. EU Ministerial Informal on Sustainable Communities. European Evidence Review papers. office of the deputy Prime Minister, London.
Omann, I., Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Assessing social sustainability. In Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics, (7), (pp, 304). Sousse, Tunisia.
Paumier, C. B. (2004), Creating a vibrant City Center: Urban design and regeneration principals, Washington: Urban Land Institute.
Pepperdine, S. (2000). Social indicators of rural community sustainability: an example from the Woady Yaloak Catchment. In Future of Australia Country Towns Conference. June, Bendigo.
Ravetz, J. (2001). City- region 2020: integrated planning for a sustainable environment. London: Routledge.
Roberts, P., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban regeneration: A handbook. London: SAGE Publications.
Robert, P. (2005). Urban and Regional Regeneration: Principles, Practice and Lessons from Experience in the United Kingdom In Hulsbergen, E. D., Klaasen, I.T., & Kriens, I., Shifting Sense (Looking back to the future in Spatial Planning), Delft University of Technology, Techne.
Smit, E. (2014). Neighborhood regeneration in a declining city: the case of Detroit, Unpublished Master's thesis, Utrecht University.
Squires, G., & Booth, C. (2015), Dysfunctional neighbourhoods: A conceptual framework for urban regeneration and renewal, Journal of urban regeneration and renewal, 8(3), 301-313.
Tallon, A. (2013). Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Routledge.
Weingaertner, C., & Moberg, Å. (2014). Exploring social sustainability: Learning from perspectives on urban development and companies and products. Sustainable Development, 22(2), 122-133.
Woodcraft, S. (2015). Underestanding and measuring social sustainability, Journal of urban regeneration and renewal, 8(2), 133-144.
_||_