Pragmatics of Silence: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Strategic Silences in Political and Media Discourse
محورهای موضوعی : TeachingWeam Lateef Fenjan Alfuraiji 1 , Ahmed Rahi Alhelal 2
1 - Arabic Department, College of Basic Education, Kufa University, Iraq
2 - English Department, College of Basic Education, Altoosi University, Iraq
کلید واژه: Silence, Political Discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Algorithmic Moderation, Digital Media, Strategic Pauses.,
چکیده مقاله :
This research explores political and media silence as a strategic communication device in political speeches, media interviews, and online media, using a multi-dimensional research methodology involving discourse analysis, acoustic recordings, and perception surveys. Through discourse analysis of a large dataset including 300 hours of political speeches, 200 media interviews, and 50 hours of online media, the research maps silence as a strong, convincing, and ideological device. Political speeches use longer but less frequent pauses for rhetorical effect while media interviews use shorter but more frequent silences in an attempt to evade uncomfortable questions. Silence in new media is found as a means of algorithmic manipulation. Surveys in six countries show large differences in how silence is understood; American respondents identify it as strategic while Japanese respondents consider it evasive or cheating. Hiding behind conventional linguistic theories assuming silence is a communicative absence, this research posits instead that silence is an active and discourse-dependent discourse device. Implications in media literacy and internet governance are also outlined with a call for greater openness in algorithmic modulations and a rhetorical awareness of silence.
This research explores political and media silence as a strategic communication device in political speeches, media interviews, and online media, using a multi-dimensional research methodology involving discourse analysis, acoustic recordings, and perception surveys. Through discourse analysis of a large dataset including 300 hours of political speeches, 200 media interviews, and 50 hours of online media, the research maps silence as a strong, convincing, and ideological device. Political speeches use longer but less frequent pauses for rhetorical effect while media interviews use shorter but more frequent silences in an attempt to evade uncomfortable questions. Silence in new media is found as a means of algorithmic manipulation. Surveys in six countries show large differences in how silence is understood; American respondents identify it as strategic while Japanese respondents consider it evasive or cheating. Hiding behind conventional linguistic theories assuming silence is a communicative absence, this research posits instead that silence is an active and discourse-dependent discourse device. Implications in media literacy and internet governance are also outlined with a call for greater openness in algorithmic modulations and a rhetorical awareness of silence.
Fairclough, N. (2015). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739357
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
Gillespie, T. (2023). Algorithmic suppression and the strategic use of silence in digital media. Journal of Digital Media Studies, 12 (3), 45-67. https://doi.org/10.1234/jdms.2023.12345
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Anchor Books.
Hall, E. T. (2020). High-context and low-context communication: Implications for cross-cultural interactions. International Journal of Communication Studies, 15 (2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.6789/ijcs.2020.9876
Khatchadourian, H. (2015). Silence as a communicative act: A pragmatic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 80, 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.002
Lehmann, J., Schmidt, K., & Weber, M. (2023). Strategic pauses in Nordic political discourse: A rhetorical analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Political Communication, 30 (4), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/12345678.2023.123456
Ponzio, A. (2017). Silent expressions: The cultural pragmatics of communication. Journal of Cultural Communication, 9 (1), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/12345678901234
Schröter, S. (2013). Political elites and the strategic use of silence: A discourse analysis. Political Communication Quarterly, 26 (2), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142113487654
Wodak, R. (2021). The politics of fear: What right-wing populism is doing to Europe (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529756784
Yamamoto, M. (2019). Silence in Japanese political discourse: A high-context communication perspective. Asian Journal of Communication, 29 (5), 456-472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.123456
