پیشگیری از فساد، پروژه های عمرانی، فساد اداری

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت منابع انسانی

سید سعید خداپرست مقدم ¹ , حمید رضائی فر ² , مهدی محمودزاده ³ , محمد محمدی ⁴

1 - دانشجوی دکتری گروه مدیریت، واحد بیرجند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیرجند، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد بیرجند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیرجند، ایران.
3 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، واحد بیرجند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیرجند، ایران
4 - استادیار،گروه مدیریت، واحد بیرجند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بیرجند، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1404/04/02 تاریخ پذیرش : 1404/05/07 تاریخ انتشار : 1404/08/15

کلید واژه: پیشگیری از فساد, پروژه های عمرانی, فساد اداری,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: فساد، پدیده ای است که امروزه گریبان گیر اکثر کشورها شده است. به عبارت دیگر، هیچ کشوري، عاري از فساد در جهان وجود ندارد. هدف این تحقیق مدل پیشگیری از فساد در پروژه های عمرانی دستگاه های دولتی می باشد.

روش تحقیق: روش این پژوهش تحلیل مضمون بود. مشارکت کنندگان شامل اساتید رشته مدیریت و مدیران ارشد و  بازرسان دستگاه های دولتی خراسان جنوبی به روش نمونه گیری از نوع هدفمند و گلوله برفی بود. جهت اعتبار داده ها از ضریب توافق دو کدگذار با ضریب کاپا استفاده گردید.

یافته ها: یافته های تحقیق نشان داد مدل پیشگیری از فساد در طرح های عمرانی در سازمان های دولتی شامل 4 مضمون فراگیر به نام های سلامت تهیه طرح، سلامت اجرای طرح،نظارت بر اجرای طرح و ارزشیابی طرح های عمرانی می باشد. همچنین 14 مضمون سازمان دهنده به نام های سلامت مطالعات بنیادی و تحقیقاتی، سلامت معیارها و استانداردهای فنی، سلامت کیفیت پروژه، سلامت اجرای مناقصات و معاملات، سلامت تفویض اختیار، سلامت مشارکت عمومی، نظارت بر مواد و تجهیزات، نظارت بر عوامل اقتصادی، شفافیت و پاسخگویی، نظارت فنی و تکنیکی، نظارت حسابرسی، ارزشیابی اخلاقی، ارزشیابی منابع انسانی، ارزشیابی پایانی پروژه می باشد.

نتیجه گیری: معیارهای بدست آمده به عنوان عوامل موثربر پیشگیری از فساد در پروژه های عمرانی در سازمان های دولتی اهمیت قابل ملاحظه ایی دارد و با در نظر گرفتن آنها می توان از بروز فساد جلوگیری کرد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and purpose: Corruption has emerged as a pervasive issue affecting the majority of nations worldwide. To put it differently, no country remains entirely unaffected by corruption. The objective of this research is to develop a comprehensive model aimed at preventing corruption within government agency construction projects.

Research method: The methodology employed in this research was content analysis. The participants comprised professors specializing in management, senior managers, and inspectors from various government agencies in South Khorasan, selected through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. To ensure the reliability of the data, the inter-coder agreement was assessed using the kappa coefficient.

Findings: The research findings indicated that the model for preventing corruption in construction projects within governmental organizations comprises four overarching themes: the integrity of project preparation, the integrity of project implementation, the supervision of project execution, and the evaluation of construction projects. Additionally, fourteen organizational themes were identified, namely: the health of foundational and research studies, the health of technical criteria and standards, the health of project quality, the health of tendering and transaction processes, the health of delegation procedures, the health of public participation, supervision of materials and equipment, supervision of economic factors, transparency and accountability, technical supervision, audit oversight, ethical evaluation, human resource assessment, and final project evaluation.

Conclusion: The criteria identified hold significant importance as key factors in the prevention of corruption within construction projects conducted by government organizations. By taking them into account, corruption can be effectively mitigated.

منابع و مأخذ:

Adindu, C., Diugwu, I., Yusuf, S., & Musa, M. (2020). Issues of corruption in construction projects and infrastructure development in Nigeria: An empirical approach. Supporting Inclusive Growth and Sustainable Development in Africa-Volume I: Sustainability in Infrastructure Development, 191-200. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-41979-0_14
Al-Bayati, A. J., & Alanazy, S. (2024). Construction Anticorruption Measures: A Literature Review. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, 11, 1. DOI:10.14455/ISEC.2024.11(1).CPM-08
Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Agency theory, corporate governance and corruption: an integrative literature review approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2337893. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2337893
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Bertalanffy, L. (1967). General theory of systems: Application to psychology. Social Science Information, 6(6), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901846700600609
Bhagat, G., & Jha, K. N. (2023). Corruption risks in public construction. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 15(2), 04522062. https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-93
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Canton, H. (2021). Organisation for economic co-operation and development—OECD. In The Europa Directory of international organizations 2021 (pp. 677-687). Routledge.
Ebekozien, A., Samsurijan, M. S., Amadi, G. C., Awo-Osagie, A. I., & Ikuabe, M. (2022). Moderating effect of anti-corruption agencies on the relationship between construction corruption forms and projects delivery. International planning studies, 27(4), 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2021.1985658
Ebenezer, O., Oyetunde-Joshua, F., Omotoso, O. D., & Shapi, M. (2023). Benzimidazole and its derivatives: Recent Advances (2020–2022). Results in Chemistry, 5, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2023.100925
Forghani Bajestani, M., Moeini Gharagozloo, M. M., & Li, S. (2024). Digital Technologies: Anti or Pro Corruption?. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 27(3), 182-199. DOI:10.1080/1097198X.2024.2372553
Goldani, S. M. R., Pour Ezzat, A. A., Amir Kabiri, A., & Rezaeian, A. (2024). Conceptualizing integrity for controlling the phenomenon of administrative corruption. Public Management Perspective [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.48308/jpap.2024.234232.1366
Islamic Consultative Assembly Research Centerhttps://rc.majlis.ir/fa/news/show/1788327
Khooshbash, A., & Dehghani, M. (2024). Investigating corruption bottlenecks in economic and contracting centers. Motahar Auditing Studies , 2 (2), 109-147 [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/2109517
Langnel, Z. (2025). Public Ethics and Integrity Infrastructure in Ghana: Imperatives for Combating Corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2025.2478982.
Lino, A. F., de Azevedo, R. R., de Aquino, A. C. B., & Steccolini, I. (2021). Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102384.
Lucas, S. O. (2015). Factors perceived to influence financing of Build-operate-transfer projects in Kenya: the Case of Rift Valley Railways consortium (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi). http://hdl.handle.net/11295/92958
Masoumi, S. F., & Hekmati, M. (2024). Organizational transparency in preventing administrative-financial corruption (Case study: Hamadan Municipality). New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting Journal , 8 (28), 2383-2397 [In Persian]. https://majournal.ir/index.php/ma/article/view/2657
Maulidi, A., Girindratama, M. W., Soeherman, B., & Andono, F. A. (2024). Organizational culture, power distance and corruption: The mediating role of religiosity. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 14(2), 203-221. DOI:10.14414/tiar.v14i2.4795
Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.2307/3082428
Nordin, R. M., Ahnuar, E. M., Masrom, M. A. N., & Ali, N. A. (2023). Examining Corruption Issues In Malaysia Construction Industry: Partaker Perspectives. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 21. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v21i26.1259
Oloruntoba, Kayode., Garba, Umar., Johnson, Dele, Matthew. (2024). 1. Corruption Menace in Building Construction Industry in Nigeria: Causes and Remedies. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i3617.
Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P., & Shan, M. (2019). Causal factors of corruption in construction project management: An overview. Science and engineering ethics, 25, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-0002-4
Papadopoulos, T. (2023). The Microeconomics of Corruption: Literature review and theoretical analysis (Doctoral dissertation, DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS The Microeconomics of Corruption: Literature review and theoretical analysis by Theoklitos Papadopoulos (Student No 6160) Supervisor: Ass. Professor Konstantinos G. Papadopoulos A Master Thesis Submitted to the Department of Economics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki). https://doi.org/ 10.26262/heal.auth.ir.348482
Partovi, A., Moradi, A., & Rafiei, A. (2024). Prioritizing the structural components of administrative corruption in contemporary Iran. Strategic Studies Quarterly , 27 (1), 87-108 [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/srq.2024.267207.3631
Rahaei, A. (2020). The role of development projects in the country's progress. Asas Scientific-Research Quarterly , 22 (59), 3-4 [In Persian]. https://www.isceiran.org/article_127898.html
Ranjbar Kabootarkhani, M., & Zarandi, S. (2024). Ranking strategies to combat administrative corruption in governmental institutions of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Comparative Public Management , 2 (2), 1-18 [In Persian]. doi.org/10.22098/cpa.2024.15398.1046
Sahharon, H., Bolong, J., & Omar, S. Z. (2023). Exploring the evolution of social cohesion: interdisciplinary theories and their impact. In Forum Komunikasi (Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 58-73). Faculty of Communication and Media Studies (FCMS). https://forumkomunikasi.uitm.edu.my/
Shariati, S., Farhadi, A., Zandi, J., & Ayoubi, A. (2023). Main reasons for the occurrence of administrative corruption in municipalities. New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting Journal , 7 (27), 917-942. .(in persian) https://civilica.com/doc/1902450.
Tawbehi, Sh. S., & Shafagh, Sh. (2017). The position of administrative corruption in Iranian governmental organizations (Case study: Alborz Province Tejarat Bank) . Scientific Conference on Management, Applied Economics, and Trade. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/680304.
Zhai, Z., Shan, M., Darko, A., & Chan, A. P. (2021). Corruption in construction projects: Bibliometric analysis of global research. Sustainability, 13(8), 4400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084400