Integrating Critical Thinking and Dynamic Assessment in Teaching Speaking and Writing Strategies: Iranian EFL Learners’ Productive Skills in Focus
محورهای موضوعی :
Raheleh Taheri
1
,
Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi
2
,
omid tabatabaei
3
,
Hadi Salehi
4
1 - Islamic Azad University, Shahreza Branch, Shahreza, Iran
2 - English Department, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
3 - English Department, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad Branch, Najafabad
4 - Assistant Professor, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
کلید واژه: Critical thinking, dynamic assessment, intermediate EFL learners, speaking and writing strate-gies,
چکیده مقاله :
The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of teaching speaking and writing strat-egies based on critical thinking and dynamic assessment on the development of the speaking and writing abilities of Iranian language learners. For this purpose, among about 200 language learners of an accredited language institute with several active branches, 80 intermediate-level learners were selected through the OQPT test and were divided into a treatment and control group with an equal number of learners. The treatment group learned speaking and writing strategies through the application of critical thinking principles via dynamic assessment. The control group learned speaking and writing strategies based on the common school method without receiving critical thinking or dynamic assessment strategies. At the beginning of the re-search, a speaking and writing pre-test was administered to all the participants to check their performance, and at the end of the treatment, the same speaking and writing test was adminis-tered as a post-test. Also, appropriate statistical instruments were exploited to gauge the partici-pants’ speaking and writing development due to the applied treatment. The obtained results were finally analyzed using SPSS software and related statistical tests to answer the research questions of the study. The results revealed that the integration of dynamic assessment and critical think-ing strategies significantly impacts the participants’ performance in speaking and written com-munication. The findings obtained from this investigation have promising implications for EFL instructors and learners, designers of educational materials, and developers of curricula.
The purpose of this research was to investigate the effect of teaching speaking and writing strat-egies based on critical thinking and dynamic assessment on the development of the speaking and writing abilities of Iranian language learners. For this purpose, among about 200 language learners of an accredited language institute with several active branches, 80 intermediate-level learners were selected through the OQPT test and were divided into a treatment and control group with an equal number of learners. The treatment group learned speaking and writing strategies through the application of critical thinking principles via dynamic assessment. The control group learned speaking and writing strategies based on the common school method without receiving critical thinking or dynamic assessment strategies. At the beginning of the re-search, a speaking and writing pre-test was administered to all the participants to check their performance, and at the end of the treatment, the same speaking and writing test was adminis-tered as a post-test. Also, appropriate statistical instruments were exploited to gauge the partici-pants’ speaking and writing development due to the applied treatment. The obtained results were finally analyzed using SPSS software and related statistical tests to answer the research questions of the study. The results revealed that the integration of dynamic assessment and critical think-ing strategies significantly impacts the participants’ performance in speaking and written com-munication. The findings obtained from this investigation have promising implications for EFL instructors and learners, designers of educational materials, and developers of curricula.
Aljaafreh, I. J. A. R. (2013). The effect of using the directed inquiry strategy on the development of critical thinking skills and achievement in physics of the tenth-grade students in Southern Mazar. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(27), 191-197.
Alnufaie, M., & Grenfell, M. (2012). EFL students' writing strategies in Saudi Arabian ESP writing classes: Perspec-tives on learning strategies in self-access language learning. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(4), 407-422.
Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learn-ers. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576-598.
Bailey, E. P., & Powell, P. A. (2015). Prac-tical Writer with Readings.
Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Integrating critical thinking in-to the classroom: A teacher’s perspec-tive. Thinking Skills and Creativi-ty, 37, 100674.
Canale, M. (1983). On some dimensions of language proficiency. Centre de re-cherches en éducation franco-ontarienne, Institut d'études pédagog-iques de l'Ontario= The Ontario Insti-tute for Studies in Education.
Dewey, J. (1910) How We Think, D. C Heath & Co Publishers: Chicago.
El-Aswad, A. A. A. (2002). A study of the L1 and L2 writing processes and strategies of Arab learners with spe-cial reference to third-year Libyan university students (Doctoral disserta-tion, Newcastle University).
Embretson, S. E. (1987). Toward the devel-opment of a psychometric approach.
Fahim, M., & Eslamdoost, S. (2014). Criti-cal Thinking: Frameworks and Mod-els for Teaching. English Language Teaching, 7(7), 141-151.
Freeley Austin, J., & Steinberg David, L. (2000). Argumentation and Debate. Wadsworth, Thomson Learning, 22-30.
Harmer, J. (2008). How to teach Eng-lish (Vol. 62, No. 3, pp. 313-316). Oxford University Press.
Kamali, M., Abbasi, M., & Sadighi, F. (2018). The effect of dynamic as-sessment on L2 grammar acquisition by Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(1), 72-78.
Kanik, F. (2010). An assessment of teach-ers’ conceptions of critical thinking and practices for critical thinking de-velopment at the seventh-grade level.
Kellerman, E. (1991). Compensatory strate-gies in second language research: A critique, a revision, and some (non-) implications for the class-room. Foreign/second language ped-agogy research, 142-161.
Khorasani, M. M., & Farimani, M. A. (2010). The Analysis of critical think-ing in Fariman's teachers and factors influencing it. Journal of Social Sci-ence of Ferdowsi University, 6(1), 197-230.
Khorami Fard, S., & Derakhshi, Z. (2019). On the role of dynamic assessment on the promotion of writing linguistic ac-curacy among EFL learners: interven-tionist model, International Journal of Research in English Education, 4(2), 14-28.
Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Lan-guage Teaching, 42(1), 355-268.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 15(11), 11-33.
Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. Vygotsky’s edu-cational theory in cultural context, 99-116.
Maarof, N., & Murat, M. (2013). Writing strategies used by ESL upper second-ary school students. International Ed-ucation Studies (6) 47-55. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n4p47.
Mohite, M. (2014). An investigation into the English language writing strategies used by Polish EFL secondary school learners MA TESOL & Applied Lin-guistics), London Metropolitan Uni-versity.
Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL speaking and lis-tening.
O'malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second lan-guage acquisition. Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
Peeravudhi, T. (2006). Use of writing strat-egies among first-year students in the MA (English for Careers) Programme (No. 112521). Thammasat University.
Petrić, B., & Czárl, B. (2003). Validating a writing strategy questionnaire. Sys-tem, 31(2), 187- 215.
Pishghadam, R., Barabadi, E., & Kamrood, A. M. (2011). The differing effect of computerized dynamic assessment of L2 reading comprehension on high and low achievers. Journal of Lan-guage Teaching and Research, 2(6), 1353.
Reed, J. H., & Kromrey, J. D. (2001). Teaching critical thinking in a com-munity college history course: Empir-ical evidence from infusing Paul's model. College Student Jour-nal, 35(2), 201-201.
Sadeghi, K., & Khanahmadi, F. (2011). Dy-namic assessment of L2 grammar of Iranian EFL learners: The role of the mediated learning experi-ence. International Journal of Aca-demic Research, 3(2).
Safrianti, R. (2018). Reading Teaching Strategies Used by English Teachers at Senior High School 1 Ampek Angkek. In 7th International Confer-ence on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT 2019) (pp. 356-363). Atlantis Press.
Shen, M., & Chiu, T. (2019). EFL learners’ English-speaking difficulties and strategy use. Education and Linguis-tics Research, 5(2), 88-102.
Shrestha, P., & Coffin, C. (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and aca-demic writing development. Assessing writing, 17(1), 55-70.
Šolcová, P. (2011). Teaching speaking skills. Czech Republic: Masaryk Uni-versity, 152.
Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social re-sponsibility: whether or how? California Management Re-view, 45(4), 52-76.
Tajabadi, A., Ahmadian, M., Dowlatabadi, H., & Yazdani, H. (2020). EFL learn-ers’ peer negotiated feedback, revi-sion outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.Org/10.1177/136216 8820951207
Thornbury, S. (2005). How to teach speak-ing. Longman.
Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (1994). The writing strategies of graduate research students in the so-cial sciences. Higher educa-tion, 27(3), 379-392.
Widyaningsih, D., & Robiasih, R. H. (2018). TEACHER’ S STRATEGIES IN TEACHING SPEAKING SKILL FOR ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMA BOPKRI 2 YOGYAKARTA. JELLT (Journal of English Language and Language Teaching), 2(1), 46-58.
Wijayanti, N. (2018). Improving Students Speaking Ability Through Infor-mation Gap Teaching. At-Ta’dib. Journal, 38-48.
Zare, M., Shooshtari, Z. G., & Jalilifar, A. (2020). The interplay of oral correc-tive feedback and L2 willingness to communicate across proficiency lev-els. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820928967
Zarrinabadi, N., Rezazadeh, M., & Shir-inbakhsh, S. (2022). “I Can Learn How to Communicate Appropriately in This Language” Examining the Links between Language Mindsets and Understanding L2 Pragmatic Be-haviours. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 51(3), 309-325.
