V3SK Model Implementation and Iranian High School Students’ Grammar Achievement: An Explanatory Mixed-Methods Investigation
Shabnam Nasimi
1
(
Department of English, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
)
Valeh Valipour
2
(
Department of English, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
)
Mohammadreza Khodareza
3
(
Department of English, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran
)
کلید واژه: V3SK model, values, skills, knowledge, grammar achievement, EFL, teacher education ,
چکیده مقاله :
The tripartite V3SK model, integrating values, skills, and knowledge, has been explored in various educational contexts but remains underutilized in English language teaching. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the V3SK model on Iranian high school students’ grammar achievement using an explanatory mixed-methods design. Participants included 43 high school teachers and 452 pre-intermediate level students, selected based on standardized placement tests. Teachers were randomly divided into groups of experimental (N = 22) and control (N = 21). The experimental group participated in 15 training sessions focused on the V3SK model dimensions. Subsequently, students from both groups completed a researcher-designed grammar pretest and received 20 sessions of instruction over three months, followed by a posttest. Quantitative data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests, revealing significantly higher grammar achievement in the experimental group. Qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with 15 experimental group teachers identified 11 themes that explain the model's contributions, including enhanced motivation, innovative teaching, and differentiated instruction. These findings underscore the V3SK model's potential for improving grammar instruction in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) settings, offering valuable insights for teacher education and curriculum development.
چکیده انگلیسی :
The tripartite V3SK model, integrating values, skills, and knowledge, has been explored in various educational contexts but remains underutilized in English language teaching. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the V3SK model on Iranian high school students’ grammar achievement using an explanatory mixed-methods design. Participants included 43 high school teachers and 452 pre-intermediate level students, selected based on standardized placement tests. Teachers were randomly divided into groups of experimental (N = 22) and control (N = 21). The experimental group participated in 15 training sessions focused on the V3SK model dimensions. Subsequently, students from both groups completed a researcher-designed grammar pretest and received 20 sessions of instruction over three months, followed by a posttest. Quantitative data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests, revealing significantly higher grammar achievement in the experimental group. Qualitative thematic analysis of interviews with 15 experimental group teachers identified 11 themes that explain the model's contributions, including enhanced motivation, innovative teaching, and differentiated instruction. These findings underscore the V3SK model's potential for improving grammar instruction in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) settings, offering valuable insights for teacher education and curriculum development.
Andrews, R., Torgerson, C., Beverton, S., Freeman, A., Locke, T., Low, G., & Zhu, D. (2006). The effect of grammar teaching on writing development. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500401997
Boutrid, A., & Martin, S. (2023). A comparative study of teacher education programs embedding ethics education into curriculum. In S. E. Eaton & Z. R. Khan (Eds.), Ethics and Integrity in Teacher Education (pp. 55-69). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16922-9_5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, J. D. (2007). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher’s guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge University Press.
Bui, M. D., Nguyen, N. T., Dao, T. V. A., & Hoan, T. K. H. (2017). In the development of professional standards for Vietnamese teachers: Studies on Singapore’s experience. International Journal of Educational Science and Research (IJESR), 7(2), 149-154.
Celce-Murcia, M., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Williams, H. A. (2007). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course. Crane Resource Centre.
Chong, S., & Cheah, H. M. (2009). A values, skills and knowledge framework for initial teacher preparation programmes. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 34(3), 1-17.
Christison, M., Christian, D., Duff, P. A., & Spada, N. (Eds.). (2015). Teaching and learning English grammar: Research findings and future directions. Routledge.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487100051003002
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
Darrow L., Fisch L, Uhry K. J, & Ellsworth N, (1998). Knowledge, values and teaching practices needed for inclusive teaching. Educational Forum, 62(3), 226-233.
De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A. F., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Facets of speaking proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000489
Derakhshan, A., & Karimian Shirejini, R. (2020). An investigation of the Iranian EFL learners’ perceptions towards the most common writing problems. Sage Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919523
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512
Ellis, R. (2016). Grammar teaching as consciousness raising. In H. Eli (Ed.), Teaching English Grammar to speakers of other languages (pp. 128-150). Routledge.
Faikhamta, C., Ketsing, J., Tanak, A., & Chamrat, S. (2018). Science teacher education in Thailand: A challenging journey. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0021-8
Hilferty, F. (2008). Teacher professionalism and cultural diversity: skills, knowledge and values for a changing Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(3), 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03246289
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147665
Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Izadpanah, J., Sadighi, F., & Akbarpour, L. (2022). Comparing explicit oral and written corrective feedback to boost learners’ grammar. Journal of Language and Translation, 12(1), 49-61.
Izadpanah, J., Sadighi, F., & Akbarpour, L. (2023). Metalinguistic Feedback Use in Grammar Retention: A Case of Iranian High School Students. Journal of New Trends in English Language Learning, 2(1), 57-70.
Jones, S., Myhill, D., & Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation of the effects of contextualised grammar teaching on students’ writing. Reading and Writing, 26, 1241-1263.
Khatib, F., & Chalak, A. (2022). Utilizing scaffolding strategies to improve Iranian intermediate EFL students’ grammatical knowledge. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Translation Studies, 7(1), 61-80.
Kheirābādi, R. (2017). The impact of flipped classroom model on teaching English grammar at 10th grade of high school. Educational Innovations, 16(4), 141-162.
Ko, C. J. (2022). Online individualized corrective feedback on EFL learners’ grammatical error correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022, 1-29.
Kumayas, T., & Lengkoan, F. (2023). The Challenges of Teaching Grammar at the University Level: Learning from the Experience of English Lecturer. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 11(1), 98-105.
https://doi.org/10.53682/eclue.v11i1.6058
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Thomson Heinle.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 48(2), 263-280.
Li, J. (2023). Pre-service teacher education policy development in Singapore. In Pre-service Teacher Education Policy Development: A Global Perspective (pp. 57-72). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5865-8_5
Lim, K. M., & Tay, E. G. (2016). Preparing teachers for the 21st century. AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education, 1(1), 1-7.
Limoudehi, M. M., Mazandarani, O., & Arabmofrad, A. (2018). The impact of focused mini grammar lessons on Iranian EFL learners' most frequent grammatical errors in writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1740-1747.
Lin, C. J., Hwang, G. J., Fu, Q. K., & Cao, Y. H. (2020). Facilitating EFL students’ English grammar learning performance and behaviors: A contextual gaming approach. Computers & Education, 152, 103876.
Liu, L. A., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Effects of metalinguistic corrective feedback on novice EFL students' digital game‐based grammar learning performances, perceptions and behavioral patterns. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13400
Liu, W. C., Chin, I. T. G., & Salleh, H. (2014). Developing teacher competency through practice in Singapore. In Practical Knowledge in Teacher Education (pp. 109-126). Routledge.
Low, E. L. (2021). Rethinking Teacher Education in the Singapore Context. In Recruiting and Educating the Best Teachers: Policy, Professionalism and Pedagogy (pp. 189-208). Brill.
Low, E. L. (2023). Education in a democratic and meritocratic society: Moving beyond thriving to flourishing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31.
Mansouri, B., & Jami, P. Y. (2022). A Survey Study of Secondary Students' Beliefs and Preferences about Grammar Instruction: An Investigation of Iranian EFL Context. MexTesol Journal, 46(2), 2.
Mirosław, P., Derakhshan, A., Mehdizadeh, M., & Kruk, M. (2023). Yet another look at strategies for learning grammar: Validating the Grammar Learning Strategy Inventory in the Iranian EFL context. System, 118, 103139.
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
Nazari, M., Boustani, A., & Sheikhi, M. (2022). A case study of the impact of a teacher education course on two Iranian EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about grammar teaching. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 7(1), 1-19.
Nisperos, J. N. S. (2022). Teaching Performance Associated to V3SK Model of a 21st Century Teaching Professional. Balkan & Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2). https://www.ibaness.org/bnejss/2022_08_02/07_Nisperos.pdf
Pallant, J. S. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows. Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest.
Quines, Z. M. (2023). Grammatical Competence and its Impact to Listening and Speaking Proficiency: An Analysis. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 11(2), 1-12.
Rajandiran, D. (2021). Singapore’s teacher education model for the 21st century (TE21). In Reimers, F. M. (Ed.), Implementing Deeper Learning and 21st Century Education Reforms: Building an Education Renaissance after a Global Pandemic (pp. 59-77). Springer.
Ratnavadivel, N., Hoon, C. L., Salih, M., Karuppiah, N., Omar, A., Yassin, S. M., ... & Hashim, A. T. M. (2014). Curriculum framework for preparing quality teachers for the future: Developing guiding principles. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 4(2), 32-44.
Sacal, P. G. Y., & Potane, J. D. (2023). Students’ Mastery of English Grammar towards Effective Writing and Speaking Competence. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(8), 2894-2904.
Sato, M., & Oyanedel, J. C. (2019). “I think that is a better way to teach but…”: EFL teachers’ conflicting beliefs about grammar teaching. System, 84, 110-122.
Seng, T. O. (2019). Teacher’s Professional Development. In 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018) (pp. 1-5). Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125910336.pdf
Shahi, M. B. (2021). Teacher Management in Federal System of Nepal: Policy Perspectives (Doctoral dissertation). Department of English Education.
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson Education.
Tan, O. S. (2012). Fourth way in action: Teacher education in Singapore. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11, 35-41.
Tan, O. S., & Chua, J. J. E. (2023). Reflections on the teacher education model for the twenty-first century (TE21) and V3SK: legacy and lessons. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09361-4
Tan, O. S., Liu, W. C., & Low, E. L. (Eds.). (2017). Teacher education in the 21st century: Singapore’s evolution and innovation. Springer.
Xia, X., & Radio, Z. (2020). Empowerment: The teacher training model in primary and secondary schools-A case study of Singapore. Open Access Library Journal, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106329
