تاثیر رهبری فراگیر و رفتار شهروندی سازمانی محیط زیستی با نقش میانجی سکوت رابطه‌ای
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت رفتار سازمانی
عباس قائدامینی هارونی
1
,
مریم کریمزاده مصطفی آبادی
2
1 - دکتری مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشکده مدیریت ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران
2 - دانشجوی کارشناسی، مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی، مرکز فارسان ، چهارمحال و بختیاری، ایران.
کلید واژه: رهبری فراگیر, رفتار شهروندی سازمانی محیط زیستی, سکوت رابطه‌ای,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر رهبری فراگیر و رفتار شهروندی سازمانی محیط زیستی با نقش میانجی سکوت رابطه‌ای بود. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر را کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه‌های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری به تعداد 2200 نفر تشکیل دادند که از طریق جدول مورگان تعداد 327 نفر به عنوان نمونه از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش پرسش‌نامه رهبری فراگیر کارملی و همکاران (2010)، پرسش‌نامه رفتار شهروندی سازمانی محیط زیستی بویرال و پیله ( 2012)و پرسش‌نامه سکوت رابطه‌ای برینزفیلد (2013)بود که روایی پرسش‌نامه‌ها بر اساس روایی محتوایی، صوری و سازه مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند و پس از اصطلاحات لازم روایی مورد تائید قرار گرفت و از سوی دیگرپایایی پرسش‌نامه‌ها با روش آلفای کرونباخ به ترتیب 85/0 ، 86/0 و 87/0 برآورد شد و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد رهبری فراگیر بر رفتار شهروندی سازمانی محیط زیستی تاثیر مثبت دارد که ضریب تاثیر آن 66/0 بود و سکوت رابطه‌ای در رابطه بین رهبری فراگیر با رفتار شهروندی سازمانی محیط زیستی ، به عنوان متغیر میانجی ایفای نقش کرد.
The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of inclusive leadership and environmental organizational citizenship behavior with the mediating role of relational silence. The present study was applied in terms of its purpose and descriptive in terms of correlational data collection. The statistical population of the present study consisted of all the employees of the universities of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces in the number of 2200 people, of which 327 people were selected as a sample through the stratified random sampling method through Morgan's table.The research tools were Carmeli et al.'s comprehensive leadership questionnaire (2010), Boyeral and Pilleh's environmental organizational citizenship behavior questionnaire (2012) and Brinsfield's relational silence questionnaire (2013). Validity was confirmed from the necessary terms, and on the other hand, the reliability of the questionnaires was estimated by Cronbach's alpha method as 0.85, 0.86, and 0.87, respectively, and data analysis was done using structural equation modeling. The findings showed that inclusive leadership has a positive effect on environmental organizational citizenship behavior, and its effect coefficient was 0.66, and relational silence played a role as a mediating variable in the relationship between inclusive leadership and environmental organizational citizenship behavior
Alingh, C. W., van Wijngaarden, J. D. H., van de Voorde, K., Paauwe, J.,Huijsman, R. (2019). Speaking up about patient safety concerns: the influence of safety management approaches and climate on nurses' willingness to speak up. BMJ Qual. Saf. 28, 39–48. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007163.
Abdou AH, Al Abdulathim MA, Hussni Hasan NR, Salah MHA, Ali HSAM, Kamel NJ. . (2023) From Green Inclusive Leadership to Green Organizational Citizenship: Exploring the Mediating Role of Green Work Engagement and Green Organizational Identification in the Hotel Industry Context. Sustainability; 15(20):14979. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014979
Aboramadan, M.; Crawford, J.; Turkmenoglu, M.A.; Farao, C. (2022) Green inclusive leadership and employee green behaviors in the hotel industry: Does perceived green organizational support matter? International Journal of Hospitality,107(10),103330. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103330.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology. 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.51.6.1173
Bansal, P., & Song, H.C. (2017). Similar but not the same: differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Acad. Manage. Ann. 11, 105–149. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0095.
Boiral, O., &Paillé, P. (2012). Organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: measurement and validation. J. Business Ethics 109, 431–445. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011- 1138-9
Brinsfield, C. T. (2013). Employee silence motives: investigation of dimensionality and development of measures. J. Organ. Behav. 34, 671–697. doi: 10.1002/job.1829
Brown, M. E., &Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: a review and future directions.Leadersh. Q. 17, 595–616. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 97, 117–134. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., &Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creat. Res. J. 22, 250–260. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
ÇINAR O., FatihKarcıoğlu&ZişanD.Alioğulları (2013). “The Relationship between Organizational Silence and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: a Survey Study in the Province of Erzurum”,Turkey, 9th International Strategic Management Conference.
Chen C, Rasheed A, Ayub A. (2023)Does Green Mindfulness Promote Green Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model. Sustainability.; 15(6):5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065012
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice:is the door really open. Acad. Manag. J. 50, 869–884. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
ElAdawi, F.M.I., Elnaggar, M.K., Hashad, M.E., Awad, A.H.I., & Abd El-Halim, .A.E.K.G. (2024). EFFECT OF GREEN INCLUSIVE LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEES' GREEN WORK ENGAGEMENT IN HOTELS AND TRAVEL AGENCIES: THE ROLE OF GREEN INTRINSIC MOTIVATION. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 54(2spl), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.542spl12-1263
FarghalyAbdelaliem, S. M., &AbouZeid, M. A. G. (2023). The relationship between toxic leadership and organizational performance: the mediating effect of nurses' silence. BMC Nurs. 22:4. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01167-8
Galpin, T., &Whittington, J. L. (2012). Sustainability leadership: from strategy to results.
J. Business Strategy. 33, 40–48. doi: 10.1108/02756661211242690
Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M. M. R., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., &Tayyeb, H. H. (2017). Impact of inclusive leadership on innovative work behavior: the role of psychological safety– CORRIGENDUM. J. Manage. Org. 23, 472–472. doi: 10.1017/jmo.2017.17
Jahanzeb, S., Bouckenooghe, D., &Mushtaq, R. (2021). Silence and proactivity in managing supervisor ostracism: implications for creativity. Leadersh. Org. Dev. J. 42, 705–721. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-06-2020-0260Jolly, P. M., & Lee, L. (2021). Silence is not golden:motivating employee voice through inclusive leadership. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 45, 1092–1113. doi: 10.1177/1096348020963699
Kura, K. M. (2016). Linking environmentally specific transformational leadership and environmental concern to green behaviour at work. Global Business Rev. 17, 1S−14S. doi: 10.1177/0972150916631069
Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, C. E. (2015). Empowering employee sustainability: perceived organizational support toward the environment. J. Business Ethics 128, 207–
220. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2093-z
Lee, S. E., &Dahinten, V. S. (2021). Psychological safety as a mediator of the relationship between inclusive leadership and nurse voice behaviors and error reporting. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 53, 737–745. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12689
Lee, W.-R., Kang, S.-W., & Choi, S. B. (2022). Abusive supervision and employee's creative performance: a serial mediation model of relational conflict and employee silence. Behav. Sci. 12, 1–14. doi: 10.3390/bs12050156
Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: a barrier to chang and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Manag. Rev. 25, 706–725. doi: 10.2307/259200
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 27,941–966. doi: 10.1002/job.413
ÖZDEVECİOĞLU,M. (2003). Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışıile Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bazı Demografik Özelliklerive Akademik Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkilerin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadive İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı 20, Ocak-Haziran, 117-135.
Paillé, P., &Mejía-Morelos, J. H. (2014). Antecedents of pro-environmental behaviours at work: the moderating influence of psychological contract breach. J. Environ. Psychol. 38, 124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.004
Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Chen, Y. (2013). Linking environmental management practices and organizational citizenship behaviour for the environment: a social exchange perspective. Int. J. Human Resource Manage. 24, 3552–3575. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.777934
Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Stahl, G. K. (2011). Developing responsible global leaders through international service-learning programs: the Ulysses experience. Acad. Managem. Learning Educ. 10, 237–260. doi: 10.5465/amle.10.2.zqr237
Ramus, C. A., & Steger, U. (2000). The roles of supervisory support behaviors and environmental policy in employee “ecoinitiatives” at leading-edge European companies. Acad. Manage. J. 43, 605–626. doi: 10.2307/1556357
Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G.,& Dean, M. A., (2018). Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Manage. Rev. 28, 190–203. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
Robertson, J. L., &Barling, J. (2017). Toward a new measure of organizational environmental citizenship behavior. J. Bus. Res. 75, 57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.007
ŞEHİTOĞLU, Y. (2010). “Örgütsel Sessizilk Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışıve Algılanan Çalışan Performansıİlişkisi.” Yayınlanmamış DoktoraTezi, GYTE, Kocaeli.
Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh,
G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research. J. Manage. 37, 1262–1289. doi: 10.1177/0149206310 385943
Sugiyama, K., Cavanagh, K. V., van Esch, C., Bilimoria, D., & Brown, C. (2016). Inclusive leadership development: drawing from pedagogies of women’s and general leadership development programs. J. Manage. Educ. 40, 253–292. doi: 10.1177/1052562916632553
Temminck, E., Mearns, K., &Fruhen, L. (2015). Motivating employees towards sustainable behaviour. Business Strategy Environ. 24, 402–412. doi: 10.1002/bse.1827
Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation. Empl. Relat. 27, 441–458. doi: 10.1108/01425450510611997
Whiteside, D. B., and Barclay, L. J. (2013). Echoes of silence: employee silence as a mediator between overall justice and employee outcomes. J. Bus. Ethics 116, 251–266. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1467-3
Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W. (2015). The bad boss takes it all: how abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. Leadersh. Q. 26, 763–774. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.002
Ye, Q., Wang, D., &Guo, W. (2019). Inclusive leadership and team innovation: the role of team voice and performance pressure. Eur. Manag. J. 37, 468–480. doi: 10.1016/j. emj.2019.01.006
Zhang, J., Chen, Y., & Liu, J. (2016). Ethical leadership and OCBE: The influence of prosocial motivation and self accountability. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings (Briarcliff Manor, NY), 10510. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2016.15588abstract
