تحلیل حق به شهر در فضاهای عمومی شهری با تأکید بر رویکرد عدالت جنسیتی.نمونه‌ی موردی:شهر ارومیه
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه
پخشان خضرنژاد
1
(دانشگاه تبریز)
محمد رضا پورمحمدی
2
(ریاست دانشگاه تبریز)
شهریور روستایی
3
(دانشگاه تبریز)
کلید واژه: فضای عمومی شهری, عدالت جنسیتی, حق به شهر,
چکیده مقاله :
این مقاله به بررسی اشکال جدیدی از حقوق ساکنان در شهرها از منظر جنسیتی و ارتباط آن به زندگی روزمره در فضاهای عمومی شهری میپردازد. به این منظور بر آن است تا با بررسی نظریهی حق به شهر به ردیابی انگاشت عدالت جنسیتی در شهرها بپردازد. روش مورد استفاده بر حسب هدف از نوع کاربردی و از نظر روش بررسی، توصیفی- تحلیلی و همبستگی میباشد. روش تحقیق، پیمایشی و ابزار سنجش، پرسشنامهی پنج گزینهای مبتنی بر مقیاس لیکرت است. در مراحل طراحی و تنظیم و با تأیید متخصصان، کمیت و کیفیت پرسشنامه مورد تأیید قرار گرفت. در بحث پایایی، روش آلفای کرونباخ مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. حجم نمونه با استفاده از فرمول کوکران برابر با 384 نفر بهدست آمد که با استفاده از ترکیب دو روش نمونهگیری خوشهای و شیوه طبقهبندی متناسب انتخاب شدند. تحلیل دادهها با استفاده از نرم افزارهای SPSS و AMOS صورت گرفت. با توجه به شاخصهای الگو سازی میتوان استدلال کرد که مدل ارائه شده از برازش خوبی برخوردار بوده است. نتایج نشان داد که رابطهی معنیداری بین شاخصهای متغیرهای مستقل حق به شهر با متغیر وابسته عدالت جنسیتی و اختلاف معنی داری در بهرهمندی زنان و مردان از حق به شهر وجود دارد.
This article reviews new forms of citizens' rights in cities from the perspective of gender and their relation to everyday life in urban public spaces. The method used in this research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of survey method is descriptive-analytical and correlation. The research method of this study is scrolling and measurement tool is a five-choice questionnaire based on Likert scale. Validity of the researcher-made questionnaire has been provided through visual and content validity. In the design and arrangement process and with the approval of experts, the quantity and quality of the questionnaire was confirmed. In the reliability discussion of the instrument, the Cronbach's alpha method was used which the results confirm that the values of all alpha coefficients are at a good level. The sample size was obtained using the Cochran formula equal to 267 people which were selected using a combination of cluster sampling and proportional classification. Data analysis was done using SPSS and AMOS 24 software. Regarding to model indices, it can be argued that the proposed model has a good conformity and a good conformity between the structured model and the experimental data. In the explanation section, the results of the research showed that There is a meaningful and direct relationship between the independent variables of the right to the city with the dependent variable of gender equity and the significant difference in the benefit of women and men from the right to the city.
-Aitken, S. (2001). Geographies of Young People: The Morally Contested Spaces of Identity, London and New York: Routledge.
-Asteria, Donna,Suyanti, EstiUtari, Dyah,Wisnu, Dewangga. (2014) .Model of Environmental Communication with Gender Perspective in Resolving Environmental Conflict in Urban Area (Study on the Role of Women's Activist in Sustainable Environmental Conflict Management), Procedia Environmental Sciences, Volume 20, 553-562
-Bagheri,A.(2013), The Role of Women in Urban Planning and Management,Shahrnegar y, Vol 62&63. pp48-60. (Persian)
-Buckingham, Shelly.)2010.( Examining the right to the city from a Gendre Perspective in Sugranyes and Mathivet(eds).pp57-63.
-Bondi, Liz, Domosh, Mona(1998). On the Contours of Public Space: A Tale of Three Women,A Radical journal of Geography, Volume 30, Issue 3, 270–289 Brown, A. (2006). Contested Space: Street trading,public space and livelihoods in developing cities. Rugby: ITDG Publishing.
-Capron G., (2002). Accessibility for ‘modern urban public spaces’ in Latin- American cities: Physical appearances and socio-spatial pertinences. Paper presented at a conference on Rights to the city, Rome, May.
-De Certeau, Michel. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, University of California Press.
-Dikeç, M., & Gilbert, L. (2002). Right to the city: homage or a new societal ethics? Capitalism Nature Socialism, 59-74.
-Fenster, T. (2005). Identity Issues and Local Governance: Women's Everyday Life in the City, Social Identities, 11:1, 23-39
-Fenster, T.(2005). The Right to the Gendered City: Different Formations of Belonging in Everyday Life, Journal of Gender Studies, 14:3, 217-231
-Gharai,F.(2012). Identification of environmental factors by relying on physical and aesthetic characteristics and its impact on the presence of women in public spaces of the city,1th Conference on Women and urban life.Tehran . (Persian)
-Greed, C. and Reeves, D. (2005). Mainstreaming equality into strategic spatial policymaking: are town planners losing sight of gender? Construction Management and Economics, 23, 1059–1070
-Habibi,M, Amiri,M.(2016) .Right to the City From Current to Ideal City, The Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research, Vol 5, Issue 2 - Issue Serial Number 10,pp 9-30.(Persian)
-Habibi ,M . Alipoor Shojaee,F.(2015).A Comparative Study between two Public Spaces, the Park of Behesht-e-Madaran, as a Specific Public Space for Women and the Park of Ab-o-Atash in Tehran. , Vol 20, Issue 1, pp 17-30. (Persian)
-Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the City, New Left Review 53: 23–40.
-Hurubeana, Alina(2013). Gender Equality Policies, Social Citizenship and Democratic Deficit in the Post-communist Romanian Society - Lumen International Conference Logos Universality
-Iranmanesh,M. Mokhtari,B (2016). Ekbatanians are looking for the right to the city: A glance at a newfound urban interactin in Ekbatan Town . Haft Shahr ., Volume 4, 49,50, pp 239-247 (Persian)
-Judi Gollor,P, Zamanian,R, Fath,H ,(2016),Tracking the notin of justie in city and urbanizatin theories: critial urban theory and the theory of the right to the city, Haft Shahr, Vol 4, 49,50,pp 100-113. (Persian)
-Lefebvre, Henri, (1996). he Urban Revolution, translated by Robert Bononno,New York, University of Minnesota press.
-Lefebvre, Henry (1991). The Poduction of Space. Oxford: Blackwell
-Isin E. (2000). “Introduction: democracy, citizenshipand the city”. In: Isin E.(ed.), Democracy, citizenshipand the global city, pp. 1–21. Routledge, New York
-Maroufi,H, Borji,G.2015. Space and Realiability of Urban Law: Identifying the Constituents of Space Obtained from the Right Urban to analyze and evaluate Nawab project in Tehran and El- Dafans in Paris .iVol 4, Issue 16(Persian)
-Massey, D. (1994) Space, Place and Gender (Cambridge: Polity Press).
-Mehdizadeh, J. (2008). An Introduction to City and Gender Theories. Searching for more humane cities.Jostar-haye-shahrsazi.No24-25(Persian)
-Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: The Guilford Press.
-Mousavi, M. Zahedian, E. (2013). Factors Influencing Women's Social Interactions in Urban Spaces.Journal of Woman and Family Studies. Vol. 6 – No. 21 .pp145-174. (Persian)
-Purcell, M (2014). Possible Worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the Right to The City. Journal of Urban Affairs.
-Purcell,M (2003). “Citizenship and the Right to theGlobal City: Reimagining the Capitalist World Order”,International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,27(3): 564-90.
-Purcell, M. (2002) Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58: 99–108
-Rafeeyan,M. Nastaran,M. AzizPoor,S.(2014).Assessment of the SatismctionJrom th e quality of UrbanSpace Based on Gender as a Variable: Case Study of Karaj Family Garden. Quarterly Journal of Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. Volume 11, Issue 4.pp 35-58. (Persian)
-Rafiyans, M, Alvandipour,N.(2014). Conceptualization of thought right to the city; seeking a
-conceptual model, IranianJournal of Socioligy. , Vol 16, 2,pp 25-47. ( Persian)
-Rahbari, L. Sharepour.M.(2011). Iranian Sociological Association Ciender and Right to the City: A Test of Lefebvre’s Theory. Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 116-141(Persian)
-Rezazadeh,R.Mohammadi,M.(2008). Designing a Neighborhood Space Based on the Gender Equality Approach and the Framework of Caring Ethics Journal of Iranian Architecture and Urbanism. Vol 1.pp15-26. (Persian)
-Rezazadeh,R.Mohammadi,M.(2009). An investigation on the factors limiting women’s presence in urban space. Honar – ha – ye – Ziba-Memari-Va-Shahrsazi. Vol 1, Issue 38.pp105-114. (Persian)
-Taghvaee,A Azizi,D. Yazdanian,A (2016) .Investiate the role of “the right to the city” theoty in the productin and reproductin of urban space, , Haft Shahr, Vol 4, 49,50,pp 88-99. (Persian)
- Taqvaee,A. Bemanian ,M. Poor Jafar ,M .Bahram Poor,M.(2015). Assessment of spatial justice theory of justice; Case: 22 districts of Tehran. Urban Management, Volume:14 Issue:38.pp391-423(Persian)
- Tiglao T, DelRosario,D.(1994). Gender and development making the bureaucracy gender-responsive. translated by Javad Yosefian.Tehran,Banoo publisher. (Persian)
-Sharepour M, Rafatjah M, Rahbari L.)2015.( Citizens Position in Arnestein's Ladder: Gender Analysis of Participatory Dimentsion of Right ti the city. Social Welfare. Vol 15 (57) .pp177-203( Persian)
-Sharifpour, M.Rahbari, L. (2013). Gender and Spatial Affinity: The Impact of Modern Architecture on Removing Private Spaces, Paper presented at the Conference of Women, Architecture and the City, International Institute of Strategic Studies of Iran. (Persian)
-Whyte, William H (1980). the Social Life of Small Urban Spaces Conservation Foundation, Washington D.C.
-Zayari,K. Torkamanniya,N. (2019). Evaluating women use of urban transport system (Case study: 6th
-district of Tehran).Urban - Regional Studies and Research Journal. Vol. 5 – No. 19 .pp149-168(Persian)
_||_
