Integrated Impact of Communicative and Pragmatic Language Teaching on Language Proficiency, Pragmatic Awareness, and Cultural Competence of Advanced University EFL Learners
محورهای موضوعی : Teaching
1 - Department of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Payam-e- Noor University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), Pragmatic Language Teaching (PLT), technology integration, pragmatic awareness,
چکیده مقاله :
This research sought to assess the integrated impact of CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) and PLT (Pragmatic Language Teaching) on language competency, pragmatic awareness, and cultural competence. The study used a mixed-methods methodology, integrating both pre- and post-tests, questionnaires, interviews, and classroom observations, in addition to technological tools to enhance learning experiences in 150 advanced EFL students from five Iranian universities. The results obtained from repeated measures ANOVA and t-tests demonstrated that the integrated use of CLT and PLT approach leads to a considerable enhancement in language proficiency, pragmatic awareness, and cultural competence, when compared to the utilization of either method individually. Qualitative findings demonstrated a notable rise in student self-assurance, enhanced comprehension of different cultures, and heightened levels of involvement. The results highlight the efficacy of combining Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Pragmatic Language Teaching (PLT) through the use of technology to improve global language training. The study's findings emphasize the necessity of providing instructor training in both strategies, developing a curriculum that effectively combines communicative and pragmatic features, and doing additional research to understand the long-term effects of integrated language teaching approaches. The research enhances our understanding of how the integration of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Pragmatic Language Teaching (PLT) might optimize language learning consequences and better equip students for real-life communication.
This research sought to assess the integrated impact of CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) and PLT (Pragmatic Language Teaching) on language competency, pragmatic awareness, and cultural competence. The study used a mixed-methods methodology, integrating both pre- and post-tests, questionnaires, interviews, and classroom observations, in addition to technological tools to enhance learning experiences in 150 advanced EFL students from five Iranian universities. The results obtained from repeated measures ANOVA and t-tests demonstrated that the integrated use of CLT and PLT approach leads to a considerable enhancement in language proficiency, pragmatic awareness, and cultural competence, when compared to the utilization of either method individually. Qualitative findings demonstrated a notable rise in student self-assurance, enhanced comprehension of different cultures, and heightened levels of involvement. The results highlight the efficacy of combining Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Pragmatic Language Teaching (PLT) through the use of technology to improve global language training. The study's findings emphasize the necessity of providing instructor training in both strategies, developing a curriculum that effectively combines communicative and pragmatic features, and doing additional research to understand the long-term effects of integrated language teaching approaches. The research enhances our understanding of how the integration of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Pragmatic Language Teaching (PLT) might optimize language learning consequences and better equip students for real-life communication.
Barron, A. (2008). Acquisition of interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. John Benjamins Publishing.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Byram, M. (2012). Language awareness and (critical) cultural awareness-relationships, comparisons and contrasts. Language Awareness, 21(1-2), 5-13.
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Longman.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Kim, Y. Y. (2007). Ideology, identity, and intercultural communication: An analysis of differing academic conceptions of cultural identity. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 237-253.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1-9). Wiley.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to post-method. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Littlewood, W. (2001). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.
Ushioda, E. (2014). Motivation, autonomy and metacognition: Exploring their interactions. In D. Lasagabaster, A. Doiz, & J. M. Sierra (Eds.), Motivation and foreign language learning: From theory to practice (pp. 31-49). John Benjamins.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and second language teaching. In J. W. Rosenthal (Ed.), Handbook of Undergraduate Second Language Education (pp. 303-318). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
