سنتزپژوهی روشهای تدریس زیستشناسی با تأکید بر یادگیری عمیق
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسیثریا میرشکاری 1 , نرگس کشتی آرای 2 , حمید عزیزی ملک آبادی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری رشته برنامه¬ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
2 - دانشیار برنامه¬ریزی درسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه علوم پایه دندان پزشکی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی اصفهان(خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: سنتزپژوهشی, روشهای تدریس, زیستشناسی, یادگیری عمیق.,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این پژوهش سنتزپژوهی روشهای تدریس زیستشناسی با تأکید بر یادگیری عمیق بود. این پژوهش با روش آمیخته طرح اکتشافی متوالی انجام شد. در بخش کیفی از روش سنتزپژوهی بر اساس مدل گاف و همکاران (2012) و در بخش کمی از روش توصیفی-پیمایشی استفاده شد. جامعه پژوهش مقالات در حوزهی شناسایی اصلاحات آموزشی در زمینهی بازنگری شیوههای تدریس زیستشناسی با تأکید بر یادگیری عمیق در سالهای 1386 تا 1400 بود که با روش هدفمند 67 منبع بهعنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. نتایج بر اساس سطوح چهارگانه نظریه یادگیری عمیق فولن کدگذاری، دستهبندی و در ادامه مدل طراحی شد. نتایج نشان داد روشهای تدریس موجود در چهار سطح نیازمند اصلاحات آموزشی هستند؛ سطح اول شایستگیهای جهانی و شامل پرورش شخصیت، ایجاد تابعیتو تعلق اجتماعی، تقویت خلاقیت/تخیل، تقویت تفکر انتقادی/حلمسأله، افزایش همکاری و بهبود ارتباطات است؛ سطح دوم عناصر طراحی آموزشی و شامل استفاده از شیوههای آموزشی مناسب، افزایش مشارکت یادگیری، اصلاح محیطهای یادگیری و استفاده از ابراز دیجیتال است. سطح سوم شرایط آموزشی و شامل شناسایی نقاط ضعف مدارس و تعیین مشکل در سیاستگذاریها است. در نهایت سطح چهارم تحقیقمشترک و شامل بررسی مشکلات معلمان در اجرا و ارزشیابی است. این مدل از اعتبار لازم برخوردار بود. به متخصصان پیشنهاد میشود تا بهمنظور اعمال اصلاحات آموزشی در تدریس زیستشناسی، از مدل طراحی شده استفاده نمایند.
The Aim of this research was to synthesize biology teaching methods with an emphasis on deep learning. This research was done with the mixed method of sequential exploratory design. In the qualitative part, the synthesis research method was used based on the model of Gough et al (2012) and in the quantitative part, the descriptive-survey method was used. The research community included articles in the field of identifying educational reforms in the field of revising biology teaching methods with an emphasis on deep learning in the years 2006 to 2021, and 67 sources were selected as samples using a targeted method. The results were coded and categorized based on the four levels of Fullan's deep learning theory, and the model was then designed. The results showed that the existing teaching methods at four levels need educational reforms; The first level of global competencies includes character development, citizenship and social belonging, creativity/imagination enhancement, critical thinking/ problem solving, collaboration enhancement, and communication enhancement; The second level is the elements of educational design and includes the use of appropriate educational methods, increasing learning participation, modifying learning environments and using digital expression and modern technologies. The third level of educational conditions includes identifying the weak points of schools and determining the problem in policy making. Finally, the fourth level of joint research includes investigating teachers' problems in implementation and evaluation. This model had the required validity. Therefore, experts are suggested to use the designed model in order to apply educational reforms in biology teaching
Ahmadigol, J. & Hatami, J. (2015). The effect of teaching through multimedia on the learning rate of biology course. Educational Technologies in Learning, 2(6): 3-18. https://doi.org/10.22054/ jti.2018.22598.1214 [Persian]
Alavian, F. (2020). Teaching genetics beyond the high school biology textbook. Research in Biology Education, 2(2): 37-53 https://dorl.net/ dor/20.1001.1.27172252.1399.2.3.4.5 [Persian]
Alavian, F & Mansouri, A. (2018). Examining the knowledge structure of biology teachers in accepting or rejecting the theory of evolution of species (case study). Research in Biology Education, 1(2): 15-26. https://journals. cfu.ac.ir/article_1015.html [Persian]
Alizadeh, B. (2018). A review of the application of brain-based education in the biology class. Research in Biology Education, 1(2): 57-68. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27172252.1398.1.2.5.7 [Persian]
Amini Tehrani, M. (2016). Creativity in teaching biology. Biology Education Development Quarterly, 104: 1-12. https://www.magiran. com/p1631491 [Persian]
Amiri, M., Jamshidian Mujar, M. & Farzin, H. (2018). Investigating the attitude of high school students towards biotechnology (a case study of students in the 9th education district of Mashhad). Research in Biology Education, 1(3): 1-12. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1. 27172252.1398.1.3.1.5 [Persian]
Askari, M. & Seif, A. (2007). Comparison of the effect of written assignments on the critical thinking of male students of the first year of Malair secondary school in biology and social studies. Educational Psychology Quarterly, 3(10): 1-33. https://jep.atu.ac.ir/article_2115. html [Persian]
Avesta, M., Imani, F. & Alavian, F. (2018). Analysis of the content of the biology book of the tenth grade of the second year of high school in the field of experimental sciences from the perspective of being active and passive based on William Rumi's model. Research in Biology Education, 1(1): 50-61. https://sid.ir/paper/269425/fa [Persian]
Basu, A., Aglira, D., & Spotila, J. R. (2017). Learning High School Biology in a Social Context. Creative Education, 8: 2412-2429 doi:10.4236/ ce.2017.815165
Behrangi, M. & Nasiri, R. (2015). The effect of teaching experimental sciences with the education management model on the self-directed learning of third year middle school students. A New Approach in Educational Management, 7(4): 1-12. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1. 20086369.1395.7.28.6.1 [Persian]
Black, P. (2020). A revolution in biochemistry and molecular biology education informed by basic research to meet the demands of 21st century career paths. J Biol Chem, 295(31):10653-10661 https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(17) 50104-0/fulltext
Brahui Moghadam, N. (2021). A review of common misunderstandings in concepts related to plants in general education. Research in Biology Education, 2(3): 15-28. https://sid.ir/paper/ 416470/fa [Persian]
Barkhan, M. & Keypour, S. (2022) Examining new methods of teaching biology in recent years in Iran and other countries, 7th National Conference on Innovation and Research in Management, Psychology and Education, Tehran [Persian]
Brahuni Moghadam, N. (2019). The necessity of familiarizing biology course teachers and biology students with the ethical principles (3RS principles) of research on laboratory animals. Research in Biology Education, 2(6): 49-64. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1. 27172252.1399.2.2.4.3 [Persian]
Brahuni Moghadam, N. (2019). Analysis of the content of the biology section of experimental science books of the first high school course based on Merrill's educational design model. Research in Biology Education, 2(1): 1-17. https://bioedu.cfu.ac.ir/article_1444.html [Persian]
Chen, Y., So, W.M. (2017). An investigation of mainland china high school biology teachers’ attitudes toward and ethical reasoning of three controversial bioethics issues. Asia Pac. Sci. Educ, 3(1): https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-016-0012-6
Ching, T., Himmelstein, D. S., Beaulieu-Jones, B. K., Kalinin, A. A., Do, B. T., Way, G. P., et al. (2018). Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15(141): [20170387]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0387
Cimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students' views. Educational Research and. Reviews, 7(3): 61. DOI: 10.5897/ERR11.205
Davidesco, I., & Tanner, K.D. (2020). Cross-Disciplinary Research in Biology Education: Challenges and Opportunities [Editorial]. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 19(3): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-07-0150
Dehwari, M. & Rudini, A. (2017). Investigating factors affecting the learning of biology topics in the second year of high school. 11th International Conference of Psychology and Social Sciences, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/777627 [Persian]
DeVon, HA., Block, ME., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, DM., Hayden, SJ., Lazzara, DJ., et al. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing scholarship, 39(2):155-64. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007. 00161.x.
Faghforian, M. & Hosseini, Kh. (2014). A comparative study of traditional and modern teaching methods in biology education. The 3rd National Conference of Madrasah Farda, Chalus. https://civilica.com/doc/403258 [Persian]
Farhadi-Moghadam, B. & Jami-Ahmadi, H. (2021). Examining the challenges of the first stage of the student Biology Science Olympiad exam and approaches to its improvement in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Research in Biology Education, 2(3): 13-3https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27172252. 1399.2.3.1.2 [Persian]
Farrokhi, A. & Akbarpour, M. (2019). A review of research-based teaching method (IBSE) in biology education. Research in Biology Education, 2(6): 77-86. https://dorl.net/dor/ 20.1001.1.27172252.1399.2.2.6.5 [Persian]
Farrokhi, A & Najafi, A. (2019). Investigation of teaching and learning based on cognitivism in biology education. Research in Biology Education, 2(5): 29-40. https://dorl.net/dor/ 20.1001.1.27172252.1399.2.1.3.0 [Persian]
Farrokhi, A. & Lohrasbi, M. (2018). Teaching biology with a technological approach. Research in Biology Education, 1(3): 31-42. https://www.sid.ir/paper/269429/fa [Persian]
Farzin, H., Jamshidian Mozhar, M., Amiri, M. & Gharin, A. (2019). Evaluation of the status of virtual education of biology among 11th grade female students in Bojnord city. Research in Biology Education, 2(1): 19-28. https://dorl. net/dor/20.1001.1.27172252.1399.2.1.2.9 [Persian]
Fathullahzadeh Ilvanaq, A., Ansarirad, P. & Zare, Z. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of teaching method E 5 in the cognitive field of learning biology. Research in Biology Education, 1(1): 31-49. https://www.sid.ir/ paper/269428/fa [Persian]
Fauzi, A., Rosyida, A. M., Rohma, M., & Khoiroh, D. (2021). The difficulty index of biology topics in Indonesian Senior High School: Biology undergraduate students’ perspectives. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2): 149-158 https://doi.org/ 10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.16538
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., McEachen, J. (2017). Deep Learning: Engage the World Change the World. Kindle Edition. https://www.amazon. com/Deep-Learning-Engage-World-Change/dp/1506368581
Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. (2013). Great to Excellent: Launching the Next Stage of Ontario’s Education Agenda. Retrieved from: http://www.edu. gov.on.ca/ eng/document/reports/FullanReport_EN_07.pdf
Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: the change imperative for whole system reform. The United States of America, Corwin (A SAGE Company) https://www.amazon.com/All-Systems-Go-Change-Imperative/dp/1412978734
Gharibi, F., Natghi, F., Mousavipour, S & Seifi, M. (2019). Phenomenology of Augmented Reality based teaching method in biology course. Research in Biology Education, 2(6): 18-3. https://www.sid.ir/paper/386147/fa [Persian]
Gough, D., Thomas, J. & Oliver, S. (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Syst Rev 1, 28. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/2046-4053-1-28
Grogans, S., Bliss-Moreau, E., Buss, K., Clark, L., Fox, A & Keltner, D. (2023). The nature and neurobiology of fear and anxiety: State of the science and opportunities for accelerating discovery. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 151: 105237. doi:10.1016/j. neubiorev.2023.105237.
Hadiprayitno, G., Muhlis, G & Kusmiyati, G. (2019). Problems in learning biology for senior high schools in Lombok Island. The International Seminar on Bioscience and Biological Education, 1241: 12-54. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/ 012054
Hajibabaei, M. & Paredeli, M. (2020). The effect of virtual lessons of biology course on the creativity of experimental science students (a case study of 10th grade students in the 9th education district of Tehran). Research in Biology Education, 2(6): 65-76. https:// journals.cfu.ac.ir/article_1700.html [Persian]
Hosseini, F. (2018). The principles and methods of teaching biology, the first national conference of Farda School, Ardabil https://civilica.com/ doc/1013210/ [Persian]
Imani, F., Avesta, M. & Rajaei, M. (2018). A review of new methods of teaching biology. Research in Biology Education, 1(4): 43-56. https://dorl. net/dor/20.1001.1.27172252.1398.1.4.4.0 [Persian]
Kaveh, M. & Hedayati, F. (2015). Meta-analysis of the content of the biology book of the second year of the new high school system based on the Plesk model of creativity. Educational Innovations, 16(61): 91-110. https://noavaryedu.oerp.ir/article _79113.html [Persian]
Kordian, P.; Zare, Z. & Ansari Rad, P. (2018). The effect of teaching biology through the teachers' lesson study method on increasing students' grades (a case study of secondary school students in Tehran). Research in Biology Education, 1(3): 43-52. https://www. sid.ir/paper/269433/fa [Persian]
Koc-januchta, M., schonborn, K., Tibell, L., Chaudhri, V & Heller, C. (2020). Engaging With Biology by Asking Questions: Investigating Students’ Interaction and Learning with an Artificial Intelligence-Enriched Textbook. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6): 1190-1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0735633120921581
Kovač, V., Nome, D., Jensen, A & Skreland, L. (2023). he why, what and how of deep learning: critical analysis and additional concerns. Education Inquiry, 26: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2194502
Krenn, M., Pollice, R., Guo, S.Y. Aldeghi, M., Cervera-Lierta, A., Friederich, P. (2022). On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nat Rev Phys, 4: 761–769 https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00518-3
Li, K., Zhao, J., Kang, Q & Wang, S. (2022). Academician Wen-Rui Hu — Eminent Pioneer and Prominent Leader of Microgravity Science in China. Microgravity Science and Technology, 34 (19): 15-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12217-022-09934-7
McComas, W., Reiss, M., Dempster, E., Chung, Y., Olander, C. (2018). Considering Grand Challenges in Biology Education: Rationales and Proposals for Future Investigations to Guide Instruction and Enhance Student Understanding in the Life Sciences. The American Biology Teacher, 80(7):483-492 https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10057320/1/Reiss_McComas%20et%20al%202018%20Grand%20Challenges%20in%20Biology%20Education.pdf
Mehrmohammadi, M & Hosseini, M. (2018). Changing and implementing the curriculum. Tehran: Samt. [Persian]
Mesbah, Z. & Behrangi, M. (2018). The effect of the application of the educational management model in the transformational leadership style of biology teachers on the responsibility and academic progress of students in the biology course. Research in Biology Education, 1(2): 35-56 https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1. 27172252.1398.1.2.4.6 [Persian]
Mesrabadi, J., Hosseini Nasab, D., Fathi-Azer, A. & Moghadam, M. (2007). Investigating the effectiveness of the concept map teaching-learning strategy on cognitive-emotional efficiency in learning biology. New Psychological Research, 2(8): 105-128. https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4356.html?lang=fa
Moghadasi, R. (2015). Teaching biology in Iranian schools. Development of Biology Education, 30(2): 4-8. https://www.magiran. com/p1631495 [Persian]
Mohebi, F. (2018). "Augmented reality" technology and its application in biology education. Research in Biology Education, 1(3): 73-84. https:// ensani.ir/file/download/ article/66eaae7379bdf-10414-33-6.pdf [Persian]
Moradi, Kh. (2016). New method of teaching biology and comparison with traditional methods. The second national conference of new approaches in education and research, Mahmudabad. https://civilica.com/doc/ 702146 [Persian]
Naseri, N. (2019). A look at two new approaches in teaching biology: constructivism and the use of creativity. Research in Biology Education, 2(3): 65-74. https://www.sid.ir/ paper/416185/fa [Persian]
Nasirpour, A & Zare, Z. (2019). Comparison of the effectiveness of the concept map teaching method with the lecture method in learning biology. Research in biology education. 28-19 (6)2. https://sid.ir/paper/408730/fa [Persian]
O'Brien, T., Stremmel, J., Pio-Lopez, L., McMillen, P., Rasmussen-Ivey, C et al. (2024). Machine learning for hypothesis generation in biology and medicine: exploring the latent space of neuroscience and developmental bioelectricity. Digital Discovery, 3:249-263 https://doi.org/ 10.1039/ D3DD00185G
Ong, S.G.T., & Quek, G.C.L. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environ Res, 26: 681–707 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-02209447-5
Ordu, U. (2021). The Role of Teaching and Learning Aids/Methods in a Changing World. New Challenges to Education: Lessons from Around the World, 19: 210-217. https://files. eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED613989.pdf
Peradley, M., Maboudi, A. & Salem Naderi, M. (2018). Comparative assessment of the students' and teachers' views of high schools in the 9th district of Tehran about the challenges of using technology in biology education. Research in Biology Education, 1(4): 71-81. https://bioedu.cfu.ac.ir/article_ 1254.html?lang=fa [Persian]
Peradley, M., Rabiei, M. & Zainalzad, M. (2018). Comparative content analysis of motor system section of biology book 2 and muscle system section of natural science book of American schools using Guilford's creativity method. Research in Biology Education, 1(1): 72-82. https://sid.ir/paper/269424/fa [Persian]
Parishani, N., Neely, M., Mirshah Jafari, A. & Agha Mohammadi, S. (2012). The effect of self-efficacy training on students' behavioral performance in biology. Teaching Research, 1(2): 81-89. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24765686. 1392.1.2.8.6 [Persian]
Parishani, N., Mirshah Jafari, A. & Abedi, A. (2010). The effect of technological active education (TEAL) in biology course on students' academic perception. Studies in Teaching and Learning, 3(1): 1-12. https:// jsli.shirazu.ac.ir/article_213.html [Persian]
Paul, U. (2018). Constructivist Approach in Teaching Life Science – an Innovative Practice in Classroom at School level. Reg. No. S/IL/86866 of 2011-2012 All India Science Teachers’ Association, W.B., India.
Plutzer, E., Branch, G. & Reid, A. (2020). Teaching evolution in U.S. public schools: a continuing challenge. Evo Edu Outreach 13(14): https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12052-020-00126-8
Porozovs, J & Dudkina, A. (2019). Secondary School and University Students’ Interest in Science Subjects in Connection to the Choice of Profession. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. 1(2): 432-441 https:// journals.ru.lv/index.php/SIE/article/view/3741
Quinn, J., McEachen, J., Fullan, M., Gardner, M., & Drummy, M. (2019). Dive into deep learning: Tools of engagement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. https://eric.ed. gov/?id=ED597945
Rajaei, M. (2018). Examining the strengths and weaknesses of the new curriculum in the field of biology education of Farhangian University in comparison with the previous curriculum. Research in Biology Education, 1(1): 5-14. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27172252.1398.1.1.2.2 [Persian]
Reiss, M. J. (2018). Biology Education: The Value of Taking Student Concerns Seriously. Education Sciences, 8(3): 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci8030130
Saadati, A. & Abbasi Manas, Q. (2019). Analysis of the content of the 12th grade biology book based on William Rumi's method. Research in Biology Education, 2(5): 63-76. https://www.sid.ir/ paper/398355/fa [Persian]
Samadi, A. (2018). Challenges in biology education and the role of creativity in increasing its learning. Research in Biology Education, 1(1): 15-30. https://dorl.net/dor/ 20.1001.1.27172252.1398.1.1.3.3 [Persian]
Samadi, A. & Beheshti, H. (2019). Effective teaching strategies according to the goals of the fundamental transformation document in biology education. National Biology Education Conference. https://eaceb.cfu.ac.ir/ paper?manu= 10730 [Persian]
Scott, F. J. (2016). An investigation into students' difficulties in numerical problem-solving questions in high school biology using a numeracy framework. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2): 115-128. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ1107794. pdf
Smith, A. (2017). An investigation in note-taking strategies. A professional paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree. https://scholarworks.montana.edu/ bitstreams/10aae2a4-1695-4464-acce-0a062ded2555/downlo
Stasinakis, P. K., & Athanasiou, K. (2016). Investigating Greek biology teachers’ attitudes towards evolution teaching with respect to their pedagogical content knowledge: Suggestions for their professional development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(6): 1605–1617. https://www. ejmste.com/article/investigating-greek-biology-teachers-attitudes-towards-evolution-teaching-with-respect-to-their-4563
Savabkar, A., Mahdavi, L. & Qudousi, F. (2018). Investigating the effect of the new structure of the 10th biology book on teachers' educational performance. Research in Biology Education, 1(4): 57-70. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1. 27172252.1398.1.4.5.1 [Persian]
Seif, S. (2020). Psychology of growth. Tehran: Organization for Studying and Compiling Humanities Books of Universities. [Persian]
Seif, M., Rabiei, M. & Lotfi Panah, S. (2018). Comparison of lecture teaching method with group discussion teaching method in biology education at Farhangian University of Tehran. Research in Biology Education, 1(2): 27-34. https://www.sid.ir/paper/269422/fa [Persian]
Selvakumar, B & Brown, A. (2021). How can high school students explore biology to challenge the concept of race? racial health equity.org https://www.racialhealthequity.org/blog/2021/7/26/how-can-high-school-students-explore-biology-to-challenge-the-concept-of-race
Showakhi, A., Naderi, A. & Abedi, A. (2007). Comparing the effect of three teaching-learning approaches on students' learning performance in biology course. Daneshvar Behavat, 14(24): 1-10. https://www.sid.ir/ paper/46427/fa [Persian]
Tajik, F. & Jalilpour, J. (2018). Effectiveness of teaching using the Instagram social network in teaching the topic of musculoskeletal problems in the 12th grade health and hygiene book. Research in Biology Education, 1(1): 62-71. https:// journals.cfu.ac.ir/article_829. html [Persian]
Taqavi, M. (2016). A comparative study of teaching biology using traditional methods and modern teaching methods. The second national conference of new approaches in education and research, Mahmudabad. https://civilica.com/ doc/701729 [Persian]
Veisi Kohra, S., Kurdnoqabi, R. & Farhadi, M. (2014). The effect of teaching biology by inductive thinking method on the learning levels of biology lesson of second grade male high school students. Research in Curriculum Planning, 12(17): 99-109 https://journals. iau.ir/article_534368.html [Persian]
Veisi Kohra, S., Imani, P., Kurdenoqabi, R., Farhadi, M & Behrouz, B. (2013). Investigating the effect of teaching biology by inductive thinking method on increasing students' creativity. Research in curriculum planning, 11(16): 14-23. https:// journals.iau.ir/article_534349.html [Persian]
Viadero, D & Sparks, S. (2021). 6 Challenges for Science Educators. https://www.edweek.org/ teaching-learning/6-challenges-for-science-educators/2021/11
Weng, C., Chen, C. & Ai, X. (2023). A pedagogical study on promoting students' deep learning through design-based learning. Int J Technol Des Educ 33: 1653–1674 https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10798-022-09789-4
Yan, P., Liu, Y., Jia, Y., Zhao, T. (2024). Deep Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Biomedicine. Appl. Sci, 14: 307. https:// doi.org/10.3390/app14010307
Zare, F. & Rezaiyan, L. (2018). Analysis of the content of the 10th grade biology textbook by Flash, McLaughlin and Close method. Research in Biology Education, 1(4): 1-14. https://www.sid.ir/paper/361665/fa [Persian]
Zare, Z., Hosnifar, J. & Ansari Rad, P. (2018). Evaluation of the quality of the curriculum of the undergraduate biology education course of Farhangian University from the point of view of student teachers. Research in Biology Education, 1(4): 15-32. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1. 27172252.1398.1.4.2.8 [Persian]