EFL Student Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice of Online Classroom Management
محورهای موضوعی : language teachingمحبوبه تقی زاده 1 , Fariba Khodabakhshi 2
1 - گروه زبانهای خارجی دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران. تهران. ایران
2 - Department of Foreign Languages, Iran University of Science and Technology, Hengam Street, Resalat, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: teacher belief, practice, online classroom management, teaching vocabulary, young learners,
چکیده مقاله :
The study investigated (a) pre-service teachers' strategy use in managing online classes of young learners in terms of six categories of time, interaction, assessment, behavior, instruction, and content; (b) the extent to which their practice matched their beliefs; and (c) their strengths and weaknesses in online classroom management. To collect the required data, the teaching practices of 26 pre-service teachers (f = 19, m = 7) who were MA students of TEFL (Teaching English as a foreign language) at Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST) were observed and then rated according to 40 strategies defined in a rating scale. The student teachers were also asked to rate their own online teaching, and then their scores were compared with those of the observers. They also answered three interview questions on their strategy use, strengths, and weaknesses in managing their class in the Adobe Connect. The results of this mixed methods research revealed that student teachers used time management strategies more than the other strategies in their practice and that the majority of whom overrated their strategy use. The results also indicated that their strengths in using the components of classroom management could be hierarchically ranked as time, interaction, content, instruction, behavior, and assessment. With regard to their weaknesses, assessment was found as the weakest component. This study can help teacher educators to offer pre-service teachers an appropriate instruction on their challenges of managing online classes of young learners.
The study investigated (a) pre-service teachers' strategy use in managing online classes of young learners in terms of six categories of time, interaction, assessment, behavior, instruction, and content; (b) the extent to which their practice matched their beliefs; and (c) their strengths and weaknesses in online classroom management. To collect the required data, the teaching practices of 26 pre-service teachers (f = 19, m = 7) who were MA students of TEFL (Teaching English as a foreign language) at Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST) were observed and then rated according to 40 strategies defined in a rating scale. The student teachers were also asked to rate their own online teaching, and then their scores were compared with those of the observers. They also answered three interview questions on their strategy use, strengths, and weaknesses in managing their class in the Adobe Connect. The results of this mixed methods research revealed that student teachers used time management strategies more than the other strategies in their practice and that the majority of whom overrated their strategy use. The results also indicated that their strengths in using the components of classroom management could be hierarchically ranked as time, interaction, content, instruction, behavior, and assessment. With regard to their weaknesses, assessment was found as the weakest component. This study can help teacher educators to offer pre-service teachers an appropriate instruction on their challenges of managing online classes of young learners.
Albaladejo Albaladejo, S., Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Songs, stories, and vocabulary acquisition in preschool learners of English as a foreign language. System, 76, 116–128.
Azizi, M., (2022). On the quality of an EAP course over four semesters of online education during Covid-19 pandemic. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11:1, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2021.53174.511
Bailey, A. (2008). Assessing the language of young learners. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 379–400). Springer.
Baker, C., Gentry, J., & Larmer, W. (2016). A model for online support in classroom management: Perceptions of beginning teachers. Connecting Education, Practice and Research, 6:1, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.5929/2016.6.1.3
Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2014). Tracing succesfull online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115:3, 1–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13558000110097055
Barbetta, P. M., Leong Norona, K., & Bicard, D. F. (2005). Classroom behavior management: A dozen common mistakes and what to do instead. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 49:30, 11–19.
Barker, P. (2002). On being an online tutor. Innovations In Education and Teaching International, 39:1, 3–13.
Bastedo, K., & Vargas, J. (2014). Assistive technology and distance learning: Making content accessible. In B. DaCosta & S. Seok (Eds.), Assistive technology research, practice and theory,(pp. 233–251). Hershey.
Bennet, S., Marton, K., & Kevin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39:5, 775–786.
Berge, Z. L. (1995). The role of the online instructor/facilitator. Educational Technology, 35:1, 22–30.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching language to young lerners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chesley, G. M., & Jordan, J. (2012). What’s missing from teacher prep?, Educational Leadership, 69:8, 41–45.
Chikasanda, V. K. M., Otrel-Cass, K., Williams, J., & Jones, A. (2013). Enhancing teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge and practices: A professional development model for technology teachers in Malawi. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23:3, 597–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9206-8
Chujo, K., & Nishigaki, C. (2004). Creating e-learning material to teach essential vocabulary for young EFL learners. Proceedings of IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning, 35–44. Waseda University.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Cohen, D., & Sasson, I. (2016). Online quizzes in a virtual learning environment as a tool for formative assessment. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6:3, 188–208. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.217
Cross, T., & Polk, L. (2018). Burn bright, not out: Tips for managing online teaching. Journal of Educators Online, 15:3, 11–15. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.3.1
Dawley, L. (2007). The tools for successful online teaching. Information Science Publishing.
Dashtestani, R., (2014). English as a foreign language–teachers’ perspectives on implementing online instruction in the Iranian EFL context. Research in Learning Technology, 22: 20142
Elgort, I., & Nation, P. (2010). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Familiar answers to new questions. In S. Walsh & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualizing learning in applied linguistics (pp. 89–104). Palgrave Macmillan.
Farrell, T. S. C., & Bennis, K. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices: A case study. RECL Journal, 44:2, 163–176.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Novice-service language teacher development: Bridging the gap between preservice and in-service education and development. TESOL Quarterly, 46:3, 435–449.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. New York: Continum Press.
Francis, O. B., & Oluwatoyin, F. C. (2019). Principals’ personnel characteristic skills: A predictor of teachers’ classroom management in Ekiti state secondary school. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7:1, 72–103.
Freiberg, H. J., Stein, T. A., & Huang, S. Y. (1995). Effects of a classroom management intervention on student achievement in inner-city elementary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1:1, 36–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/1380361950010103
Garton, S., & Copland, F. (2019). The Routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners. Oxford: Routledge.
Genc, Z., & Aydin, F. (2017). An analysis of learners’ motivation and attitudes toward learning English language at tertiary Level in Turkish EFL context. 10:4, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n4p35
Good, B., & Brophy, J. (2000). Looking in classroom. New York: Educational Publisher.
Gunawan, I., (2017). The application of instructional management based lesson study and its impact with student learning achievement. Advances in Econimic, Business and Management Research, 45, 4–12. https://doi.org/10.2991/coema-17.2017.2
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18:4, 311–326.
Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8:2, 30–42.
Kelly, S., & Gaytan, J., (2019). The effect of instructor’s immediate behaviors and clarity on student writing apprehension. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 83:1, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619868822
Lewis, M., (2004). Establishing a service: A whole population approach. Child: Care, Health and Development, 30:3, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00415.x
Lindberg, J. O., & Olofsson, A. D. (2010). Online learning communities and teacher professional development: Methods for improved education delivery (3rd ed.). Information Science Reference. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI-gobal.
Linse, C., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching:Young learners. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lourenço, M., & Raquel Simões, A. (2021). Teaching and learning for global citizenship in the EFL classroom: Towards a pedagogical framework. In S. Saude, M. A. Raposo, N. Pereira, & A. I. Rodrigues (Eds.), Teaching and learning practices that promote sustainable development and active citizenship (pp. 86-106). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Ward-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning, 23:1, 184–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329
Martin, N. K., Yin, Z., & Baldwin, B. (1998). Construct validation of the attitudes & beliefs on classroom control inventory. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33:2, 6–15.
Marzano, R. J. (2003). Classroom management that works. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Moser, K. M., Wei, T., & Brenner, D., (2021). Remote teahcing during Covid-19: Implications from a national survey of language educators. System, 97, 102431.
Nation, P. I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another languge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nikolov, M., & Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2021). Assessing young learners’ foreign language abilities. Language Teaching, 54, 1–37.
Nunan, D. (2011). Teaching English to young learners. California: Anaheim University Press.
Omoteso, B. A., & Semudara, A. (2011). The relationship between teachers’ effectiveness and management of classroom misbehaviours in secondary schools. Psychology, 2:9, 902–908. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.29136
Oral, B. (2012). Student teachers’ classroom management anxiety: A study on behavior management and teaching management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42:12, 2901–2916.
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2021). The role of expert feedback in the development of pre-service teachers’ professional vision of classroom management in an online blended learning environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99:4, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103276
Ritter, J. T., & Hancock, D. R. (2007). Exploring the relationship between certification sources, experience levels, and classroom management orientations of classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23:7, 1206–1216.
Salehizadeh, S., Shabani, M., & Malmir, A. (2020). Professionalism: The perceptions of Iranian English teachers of competence and performance in language teaching. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9:1, 1–14. http://doi.org/ 20.1001.1.24763187.2020.9.1.1.8
Salmon, G. (2011). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (3rd ed.). Oxford: Routledge.
Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native–myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Prespectives, 61:4, 364–379.
Shaha, S., & Ellsworth, H. (2013). Predictors of success for professional development: Linking student achievement to school and educator successes through on-demand, online professional learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 40:1, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v11i1.9096
Shepperd, J. A., & Mcnulty, J. K., (2002). The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes. Psychological Science, 13:1, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-9280.00416
Shi, M., Bonk, C. J., & Magjuka, R. J. (2006). Time management strategies for online teaching. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3:2, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1724773
Shin, J., & Crandall, J. (2014). Teaching young learners English (1st ed.). National Geographic learning.
Snae, C., & Brueckner, M. (2008.). A learner-centered multimedia-enhanced system with online assessment for young learners. Internation Journal of the Computer, 16:3, 44.1–44.6. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15345a
Spiri, J. (2008). Online study of frequency list vocabulary with the WordChamp website. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 7:1, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.520675
Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9053z
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1:3, 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302814
Voss, T., Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates’ general pedogogical/psychological knowledge: Test construction validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103:4, 952–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025125
Wang, Y. M. (2002). When technology meets beliefs: Pre-service teachers’ perception of the role of the teacher’s role in the classroom with computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35:1, 150-161.
Weber, K. E., Gold, B., Prilop, C. N., & Kleinknecht, M. (2018). Promoting pre-service teachers’ professional vision of classroom management during practical school training: Effects of a structured online- and video-based self-reflection and feedback intervention. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.008
Whitelock, D. (2009). Editorial: E-assessment: Developing new dialogues for the digital age. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40:2, 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00932.x
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2017). See and tell : Differences between expert and novice teachers ’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015
Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., van den Bogert, N., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Teacher vision: Expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instructional Science, 44:3, 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9367-z4
Wolff, C. E., van den Bogert, N., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2015). Keeping an eye on learning: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ representations of classroom management events. Journal of Teacher Education, 66:1, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114549810
Yasin, B., & Mustafa, F. (2020). The effect of English teacher’s instructional management skills on beginner students’ achievement and perception. International Journal of Instruction, 13:4, 49–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1344a
