EFL Learners’ and Teachers’ Perceptions toward Corrective Feedback and Collaborative Writing: A Mixed-Methods Study
محورهای موضوعی : English Language Teaching (ELT)
Maryam Soleimani
1
,
Zahra Aghazadeh
2
1 - Department of Humanities, Farhangiyan University, Urmia, West Azarbaijan, Iran
2 - Ministry of Education
کلید واژه: Corrective Feedback, Collaborative Writing, EFL Learners, EFL Teachers, Perceptions ,
چکیده مقاله :
Perceptions have absorbed scholarly scrutiny within the domain of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) due to their potential to significantly impact learning behaviors. Hence, this study investigated female English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ and learners’ attitudes toward patterns of Corrective Feedback (CF) and Collaborative Writing (CW). This study involved 150 EFL female learners aged between 14 and 20 along with 40 EFL female instructors at Iran Language Institute (ILI) in Urmia, Iran. The learners filled out the adapted version of Loewen et al.’s (2009) CF scale that encompassed 24 items. Additionally, a CF questionnaire, developed by the researcher, was administered to the teachers that comprised of 14 items. Furthermore, a CW questionnaire adapted from Aghazadeh et al. (2022) involving 8 items were administered among the learners and the teachers. To supplement the quantitative data at the end of the study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants. The outcomes demonstrated that both teachers and learners had a positive attitude toward CF and CW. The theoretical and practical implications of the study were accordingly discussed.
Perceptions have absorbed scholarly scrutiny within the domain of Second Language Acquisition (SLA) due to their potential to significantly impact learning behaviors. Hence, this study investigated female English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ and learners’ attitudes toward patterns of Corrective Feedback (CF) and Collaborative Writing (CW). This study involved 150 EFL female learners aged between 14 and 20 along with 40 EFL female instructors at Iran Language Institute (ILI) in Urmia, Iran. The learners filled out the adapted version of Loewen et al.’s (2009) CF scale that encompassed 24 items. Additionally, a CF questionnaire, developed by the researcher, was administered to the teachers that comprised of 14 items. Furthermore, a CW questionnaire adapted from Aghazadeh et al. (2022) involving 8 items were administered among the learners and the teachers. To supplement the quantitative data at the end of the study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the participants. The outcomes demonstrated that both teachers and learners had a positive attitude toward CF and CW. The theoretical and practical implications of the study were accordingly discussed.
Aghazadeh, Z., Mohammadi, M., & Sarkhosh, M. (2022). Oral and written summarizing strategy training and reading comprehension: Peer-mediated vs. individualistic task performance. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.11157
Ahmadi Shirazi, M., & Shekarabi, Z. (2014). The role of written corrective feedback in enhancing the linguistic accuracy of Iranian Japanese learners’ writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 99-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2014.20426
Akoto, M. (2021). Collaborative multimodal writing via Google Docs: Perceptions of French FL learners. Languages, 6(3), 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030140
Ashoori Tootkaboni, A., & Khatib, M. (2014). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback on improving writing accuracy of EFL learners. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 7(3), 30-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.529
Bozorgian, H., & Yazdani, A. (2021). Direct written corrective feedback with metalinguistic explanation: Investigating language analytic ability. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 65-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2021.120976
Brown, D. (2016). The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168814563200
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267- 296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills: theory and practice. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Chen, W., & Liu, G. (2021). Effectiveness of corrective feedback: Teachers’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2021.120974
Corpuz, V. A. (2011). Error correction in second language writing: Teachers' beliefs, practices, And students' preferences. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Queenland University of Technology, Faculty of Education. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/49160/
Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 3-18). Routledge.
Fahim, M., & Haghani, M. (2012). Sociocultural perspectives on foreign language Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 693-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.4.693-699
Fernández-Dobao, A. (2020). Collaborative writing in mixed classes: What do heritage and second language learners think?. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12446
Ferris, D. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587804
Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588049
Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005
Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490
Ghandi, M., & Maghsoudi, M. (2014). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ spelling errors. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p53
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations.
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90006-B
Karimi, M. (2014). The impact of teacher’s implicit versus explicit corrective feedback on learning l2 grammar by Iranian English learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4), 223-234. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:223-234
Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. Oxford University Press.
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and
indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students'
perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 176-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/flan.12443
Khanlarzadeh, M., & Nemati, M. (2016). The Effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 55-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2016.20365
Komura, K. (1999). Student response to error correction in ESL classrooms. In Ferris, D. (2003), Response to student writing: Implications for second language students (105-128). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002a). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 343-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00009-0
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002b). Collaborative writing in L2: The effect of group interaction on text quality. In: G. Rijlaarsdam, M. L. Barbier, & S. Ransdell (Eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 168-187). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001
Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x
Li, S. (2018). Corrective feedback in L2 speech production. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL
encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-9). Wiley.
Loewen, S. Li, Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). L2 learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
Mahvelati, E. H. (2021). Learners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher
corrective feedback conditions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 1-21.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995
Maleki, A., & Eslami, E. (2013). The effects of written corrective feedback techniques on EFL students’ control over grammatical construction of their written English. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(7), 1250-1257. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.7.1250-1257
Schmidt, R. (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press.
Soleimani, M., & Modirkhamene, S. (2020). Various corrective feedback types in collaborative vs. individual writing conditions. International Journal of Research in English Education, 5(3). http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-352-en.html
Sorayaei Azar, A., & Molavi, S. (2012). Iranian EFL learners’ attitudes toward correction of oral errors. Retrieved from www.futureacademy.org.uk/files/menu_items/other/ejsbs52.pd
Shen, R., & Chong, S. W. (2022). Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL
and EFL contexts: a qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2072468
Stewart, D. C. (1988). Collaborative learning and composition: boon or bane? Rhetoric Review, 7(1), 58-83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/465535
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
Swain, M., (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In: Lantolf, J. (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000090
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zarei, A. A., & Rahnama, M. (2014). The effect of written corrective feedback modes on ELF learners’ grammatical and lexical writing accuracy: From perceptions to facts. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 1(3), 1-14. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:51859033
Zheng, Y., Yu, S., & Liu, Z. (2020). Understanding individual differences in lower-proficiency
students' engagement with teacher written corrective feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 28, 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1806225
Zheng, Y., Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2021). Implementing collaborative writing in Chinese EFL classrooms: Voices from tertiary teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 631561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631561
Zimmermann, R. (2000). L2 writing: Sub-processes, a model of formulating and empirical findings. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 73-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00019-5
