Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Learner Autonomy and their Beliefs about the Role of Textbooks in Fostering it: A Mixed-Methods Study
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش زبان انگلیسی
Amir Sarkeshikian
1
(
Department of English Language, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
)
Sahar Fallah
2
(
Department of English Language, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran
)
کلید واژه: EFL, Iranian EFL textbooks, learner autonomy, teacher's perceptions,
چکیده مقاله :
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of learner autonomy; however, the roles of teachers and language materials in fostering in have not received due attention. This mixed methods study investigated the association between what Iranian teachers perceived of LA and what they thought about the role of textbooks in fostering EFL learners’ LA, and to what extent they believed the principles of LA in their classrooms. The participating teachers were 200 male and female teachers that taught Iranian tenth-grade EFL textbook in senior high schools of Qom, Arak, and Karaj. The first instrument was a questionnaire developed by Borg and Al-Busaidi (2012), which primarily focused on the teachers’ perspectives and opinions about LA. The second questionnaire was used to investigate how Iranian EFL teachers think the EFL textbook Vision 1 helps foster LA. The questionnaire was developed based on the LA principles (Fenner & Newby, 2000). The last instrument was an interview protocol that was developed by the researcher to gain a deeper understanding of teachers’ promoting LA in their teaching. The interview protocol also was based on Fenner and Newbys’ (2000) principles. For this study, the questionnaire data were collected through two questionnaires. Moreover, an interview protocol was used to gather qualitative data from 12 teachers, who participated in the interviews (i.e., 2 face-to-face and 10 online interviews). The result of the bivariate correlation test showed that there was a significant relationship between teachers’ perception of learner autonomy and their opinions about the LA-fostering role of the Iranian 10th-grade EFL textbook. The results of the interview analysis showed that the principles of learner autonomy were largely approved of by the interviewees. The study has some implications for textbook developers, teachers trainers, and teachers.
In recent years, there has been a growing recognition of learner autonomy; however, the roles of teachers and language materials in fostering in have not received due attention. This mixed methods study investigated the association between what Iranian teachers perceived of LA and what they thought about the role of textbooks in fostering EFL learners’ LA, and to what extent they believed the principles of LA in their classrooms. The participating teachers were 200 male and female teachers that taught Iranian tenth-grade EFL textbook in senior high schools of Qom, Arak, and Karaj. The first instrument was a questionnaire developed by Borg and Al-Busaidi (2012), which primarily focused on the teachers’ perspectives and opinions about LA. The second questionnaire was used to investigate how Iranian EFL teachers think the EFL textbook Vision 1 helps foster LA. The questionnaire was developed based on the LA principles (Fenner & Newby, 2000). The last instrument was an interview protocol that was developed by the researcher to gain a deeper understanding of teachers’ promoting LA in their teaching. The interview protocol also was based on Fenner and Newbys’ (2000) principles. For this study, the questionnaire data were collected through two questionnaires. Moreover, an interview protocol was used to gather qualitative data from 12 teachers, who participated in the interviews (i.e., 2 face-to-face and 10 online interviews). The result of the bivariate correlation test showed that there was a significant relationship between teachers’ perception of learner autonomy and their opinions about the LA-fostering role of the Iranian 10th-grade EFL textbook. The results of the interview analysis showed that the principles of learner autonomy were largely approved of by the interviewees. The study has some implications for textbook developers, teachers trainers, and teachers.
Ahmadi M., & Izadpanah, S. (2019). The study of relationship between learning autonomy, language anxiety, and thinking style: The case of Iranian university students. IJREE, 4(2). http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-141-en.html
Al-Asmari, A.R. (2013). Practices and prospects of LA: Teachers’ perceptions. English Language Teaching 6(3), 1-10.
Alavi Moghaddam, S.B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, R. (2016). Vision 1. Iranian Ministry of Education.
Alibakhshi, G. (2015). Challenges in promoting EFL learners' autonomy: Iranian EFL teachers’ perspectives. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 4(1), 79-98.
Alibakhshi, G., & Rezaei, S. (2013). On the consequences of the violation of critical pedagogy principles from Iranian EFL teacher trainers’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 5(2), 1-28.
Almusharraf, N., & Martínez Agudo, J.D.D. (2020). Teachers’ perspectives on promoting learner autonomy for vocabulary development: A case study. Cogent Education, 7(1). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2020.1823154
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Longman.
Benson, P. (2005). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd ed.). Longman.
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers' beliefs and practices. British Council.
Chan, V. (2001) Readiness for LA: What do our learners tell us? Teaching in Higher Education 6(4), 505-18.
Chan, V. (2003). Autonomous language learning: The teachers’ perspectives. Teaching In Higher Education, 8(1). 33-54.
Cotteral, S. (2000). Promoting LA through the curriculum: principles for designing language courses. ELT Journal. 54(2) 109-115.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.
Daflizar, S. U., & Kamil, D. (2022). Language learning strategies and learner autonomy: The case of Indonesian tertiary EFL students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 257-281.
Dam, L., Eriksson, R., Little, D., Miliander, J., & Trebbi, T. (1990). Towards a definition of autonomy. In T. Trebbi (Ed.), Third Nordic workshop on developing autonomous learning in the FL classroom (pp. 102-103). University of Bergen.
Dickinson, L. (1987) Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Fenner, A., & Newby, D. (2000). Approaches to materials design in European textbooks: Implementing principles of authenticity, LA, cultural awareness. European Centre for Modern Languages.
Green, S. (2000). New perspectives on teaching and learning modern languages. Modern Languages in Practice.
Hashemi, M. R., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828–852. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12049.x
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Pergamon.
Johnson, R. B., Onwuengbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
Lacey, F. (2007). Autonomy, never, never, never! Independence, 42, 4-8.
Singh Negi J., & Laudari, S. (2022) Challenges of developing learner autonomy of English as a foreign language (EFL) learner in underprivileged areas. IJREE, 7(2).
http://ijreeonline.com/article-1-689-en.html
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions, issues and problems. Authentik.
Little, D. (2022). Language LA: Rethinking language teaching. Language Teaching, 55(1), 64-73. doi:10.1017/S0261444820000488
Littlejohn, A. (1985) Learner choice in language study. ELT Journal, 39(4). 253-261.
Martinez, H. (2008). The subjective theories of student teachers: Implications for teacher education and research on LA. In T. E. Lamb &H. Reinders (Eds.), Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses (pp. 103-124). John Benjamins.
Newby, P. (2010). Research methods for education. Pearson Education.
Nunan, D. (1997). Designing and adapting materials to encourage LA. In P. Benson & P. Voller (Eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 192-203). Longman.
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Reinders, H., & Balcikanli, C. (2011). Learning to foster autonomy: The role of teacher education materials. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2(1), 15-12.
Reinders, H., & Lazaro, N. (2011). Beliefs, identity and motivation in implementing autonomy: The teachers’ perspective. In G. Murray, X. Gao & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation, and autonomy in language learning (pp. 125-142). Multilingual Matters.
Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language education. Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, B. (2000). LA: The next phase? In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath & T. Lamb (Eds.), LA, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 4-14). Longman
Smith, R. (2008). LA. ELT Journal, 62(4), 395-397.
Zohrabi, M. (2011). Enhancing LA through reciprocal approach to curriculum development. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 120-127.
