English Language Teachers’ Attitudes towards Instructional Technology and their Teaching Satisfaction
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمه
Mitra Moazam
1
(
English Department, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
)
Mostafa Zamanian
2
(
English Department, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
)
Firooz Sadighi
3
(
English Department, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Attitude, Job satisfaction, Instructional Technology,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigated Iranian EFL Teachers’ attitudes towards instructional technology in their classroom and its impact on their job satisfaction. Data were collected using the Media Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale and Teacher Job Satisfaction Questionnaire to examine teachers’ attitudes towards the use of instructional technology within the classroom and its effects on their job satisfaction. A sample of 80 teachers was asked to complete a survey detailing their job satisfaction and assessing attitudes towards technology integration in the classroom. Based on the present study’s findings, teachers’ job satisfaction slightly predicted the impacts of instructional technology. In addition, after analyzing the data using multiple regression analysis, it was further discovered that the use of a smartphone could highly predict the significant impacts of the use of integrated technology on teachers’ job satisfaction. The research suggested that teachers need support to better integrate the available technologies within the classroom.
هدف از این مطالعه بررسی نگرش معلمان)زبان انگلیسی به عنوان زبان خارجی)ایرانی نسبت به استفاده از فناوری آموزشی در کلاس و تأثیر آن بر رضایت شغلی آنها بود. از 80 معلم خواسته شد که یک نظرسنجی با جزئیات رضایت شغلی خود در کلاس و همچنین یک نظرسنجی ارزیابی نگرش نسبت به ادغام تکنولوژی در کلاس ، تکمیل کنند. داده ها با استفاده از مقیاس استفاده و نگرش فن آوری رسانه (MTUAS) و پرسشنامه رضایت شغلی معلمان (TJSQ) برای بررسی نگرش معلمان نسبت به استفاده از فناوری آموزشی در کلاس و تأثیرات آن بر رضایت شغلی آنها جمع آوری شد. بر اساس یافته های مطالعه حاضر ، رضایت شغلی معلمان تأثیرات استفاده از فناوری آموزشی را اندکی پیش بینی کرد. علاوه بر این ، پس از تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از تجزیه و تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه ، همچنین مشخص شد که استفاده از تلفن هوشمند می تواند تأثیرات قابل توجه استفاده از تکنولوژی یکپارچه بر رضایت شغلی معلم را پیش بینی کند. این تحقیق حاکی از آن است که معلمان برای ادغام بهتر تکنولوژی که در کلاس برای آنها در دسترس است ، به پشتیبانی نیاز دارند.
Agu L.U, (2014). Job Satisfaction Factors of Primary School Teachers – A case study of Nasarawa State. Nigeria –Vocational Association Journal (NVAJ). 19(2) 117 – 127.
Butler, D. L., &Sellborn, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology. Educause Quarterly, 2, 22-28.
Clark, C. (2013). A phenomenological study of the impact of pre-service and in-service training regarding the integration of twenty-first-century technologies into selected teachers’ instruction, (Doctoral Dissertation) Liberty University.
Colgan, C. (2004). Is there a teacher retention crisis? American School Board Journal, 8,
22-25.
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of
State policy evidence. Retrieved September 8, 2017, from www.epaa.asu.edu/eppaav8n1.
Ellis, N., & Bernhardt, R. (1992). Prescription for teacher satisfaction: Recognition
And responsibility. The Clearing House, 65(1), 179-186.
Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. (2000). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of good technology use to best practice. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Houchins, D., Shippen, M. &Cattret, J. (2004). The retention and attrition of juvenile justice teachers. (2004). Education and Treatment of Children, 27(4), 374-393.
Klassen, R., & Chiu, M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 741-756.
Latham, A. (1998). Teacher satisfaction. Educational Leadership, 55(5), 82-83.
Lester, P.E. (1982). Teacher job satisfaction questionnaire. Long Island University.
Brookville; New York.
Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
Mertler, C. (2002). Job satisfaction and perception of motivation among middle and high
School teachers. American Secondary Education, 31(1), 43-53.
Moore, B.M. (1987). Individual difference and satisfaction with teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D.C. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED282851).
Obineli, A (2013). Teachers’ Perception of the Factors Affecting Job Satisfaction in Ekwusigo Local Government of Anambra State. Department of Guidance and Counselling Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka Anambra State, Nigeri.
Okoye, A.U. (2011). Attitudes of Primary School Teachers Toward Introduction of Career Guidance in Primary Schools. A journal that cuts across all behavioural issues, 3 (2).
Okonkwo, M.C. &Obineli S. A. (2011). The Roles of Counselling in Promoting Good Leadership: Anambra State on the Focus. A journal that cuts across all behavioral issues. 3 (2).
Plecki, M. (2000). Economic perspectives on investments in teacher quality: Lessons
learned from research on productivity and human resource development.
Retreived April 12, 2017 from www.epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n33.html
Protheroe, N., Lewis, A., & Paik, S. (2002). Promoting teacher quality. Retrieved
January 18, 2017 from www.ers.org/spectrum/win02a/htm.
Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K. E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30.
Sari, H. (2005). How do principals and teachers in special schools in Turkey rate themselves on levels of burnout, job satisfaction, and locus of control? Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 51(2), 172-192.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and
technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp.97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shann, M. (1991). Professional commitment and satisfaction among teachers in urban
middle schools. Journal of Educational Research, 92(2), 67-75.
Sharma, R. D., & Jyoti, J. (2009). Job satisfaction of university teachers: An empirical study. Journal of Services Research, 9(2), 51-80.
Stockard, J. & Lehman, M. (2004). Influences on the satisfaction and retention of 1st-year teachers: The importance of effective school management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 742-771.
Tillman, W. R., & Tillman, C. J. (2008). Moreover, you thought it was the apple: A study of job satisfaction among teachers. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12(3), 1-18.
Vannatta, R. &Beyerbach, B. (2000). Facilitating a constructivist vision of technology integration among education faculty and preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 132-148.
Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36 (3), 231-250.
Weiqi, C. (2014) The structure of secondary school teacher job satisfaction and its relationship with attrition and work enthusiasm. Chinese Education & Society, 40(5), 17-31.
Wu, V. & Short, P. M. (1996). The relationship of empowerment to teacher job commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 23(1), 85-90.
Zembylas, M., &Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Modelling teacher empowerment: The role of job satisfaction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(5), 433-459.
