Syntactic Devices of Information Structure in Persian Spoken Genres: Political, Scientific, and Everyday Conversation in Focus

محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمه

Fatemeh Aghaei ¹ (English Department, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran)
Bahram Hadian ² (English Department, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran)
Vali Rezaei ³ (Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Foreign Languages, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/02/25 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/04/20 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/04/10

کلید واژه: information structure, passive, genres, Clefting, Preposing, Pseudo-clefting, Syntactic devices,

چکیده مقاله :

This descriptive and corpus-based study examined the role of genres and their discourse features in information structure and its syntactic representations in Persian. It aimed to investigate three genres of Persian spoken language, that is, political, scientific, and everyday conversation, in terms of their information structure as realized through four syntactic devices of clefting, pseudo-clefting, passive, and preposing. For this purpose, 1000 utterances related to each of the mentioned genres were extracted based on Lambrecht’s theoretical framework for modeling the information structure. The collected data were then transcribed, and the most frequently-used syntactic structures of information structure in each genre were identified. Finally, the Mann-Whitney U test and descriptive statistics were used to see which of the three genre types has higher values than the other two in terms of the four syntactic devices. The results of data analysis revealed that there is a significant difference among the three genres in terms of the frequency of use of syntactic devices. In fact, preposing occurred most frequently in everyday conversations, passives in scientific texts, and clefting and pseudo-clefts in political texts. This finding has supportive implications for linguistic and educational experts as well as language theoreticians.

چکیده انگلیسی:

درتحقیق پیکره-محو حاضرنقش گونه های زبانی و ویژه گی های گفتمانی ساخت اطلاع و نمود نحوی آن در زبان فارسی بررسی می شود. به بیانی دیگر، در این تحقیق مطالعه تجلی گونه های سیاسی، علمی و محاوره ای در قالب ابزارهای نحوی مختلف مورد نظراست. بدین منظور، بر اساس چارچوب نظری "لمبرشت" تعداد هزار عبارت از هر یک از این سه گونه زبانی از منابع مختلف جمع آوری شده، ساختارهای دستوری فراوان-کاربرد هر یک شناسایی گردید. سپس از طریق آزمون "من وایتلی یو" مشخص گردید کدام ابزار نحوی ساخت اطلاع در این سه گونه بیشترین کاربرد را دارد. تحلیل داده ها نشان داد تفاوت معنا داری بین این گونه ها از نظر فراوانی کاربرد ابزار نحوی وجود دارد. در واقع، معلوم گردید ابزارنحوی "پیش آیند ساز"، "مجهول" و "اسنادی" بیشترین کاربرد را بترتیب درگونه های محاوره ای، علمی و سیاسی دارند. این یافته برای متخصصین زبانشاسی، آموزش زبان و نظریه پردازان زبان قابل استفاده خواهد بود.                                         

منابع و مأخذ:

Banon, J. A., & Martin, C. (2019). Anticipating information structure: An event-related potentials study of focus assignment via the it-cleft. Neuropsychologia, 134, 107203.

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style, Cambridge, CUP. In.

Brown, G., Brown, G. D., Brown, G. R., Gillian, B., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis: Cambridge university press.

Büring, D. (2006). Focus projection and default prominence. In The architecture of focus (pp. 321-346): de Gruyter Mouton.

Büring, D. (2007). Semantics, intonation and information structure. The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 445474.

Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. Subject and topic.

Dik, S. C. (1997). The theory of functional grammar: the structure of the clause: Walter de Gruyter.

Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure: The syntax-discourse interface (Vol. 3): Oxford University Press.

Féry, C., & Ishihara, S. (2014). The Oxford handbook of information structure: Oxford University Press.

Gundel, J. K., & Fretheim, T. (2004). Topic and focus. InHorn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gergory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 175–196. In: Oxford: Blackwell.

Hadian, B., Tavangar-rizi, M., & Amouzade, M. (2013). A Functional Analysis of the Passive Structure in Persian. International Journal of Linguistics, 5(4), 22-37.

Halliday, M. (1985). AK An Introduction tO Functional Grammar [MJ. Lond: Edwa~ Amold, 1, 994.

Halliday, M. A. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of linguistics, 3(2), 199-244.

Herdiana, H., Hidayat, D. N., Alek, A., & Husna, N. (2020). GIVEN AND NEW INFORMATION IN BARACK OBAMA’S REMARKS: A SYNTACTIC FORM ANALYSIS. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 8(4), 458-464.

Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition (Vol. 8): MIT press.

Jackendoff, R. S. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT press

Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L. (2020). Syntax-information structure interactions in the sentential, verbal and nominal peripheries: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3-4), 243-276.

Lambrecht, K. (1986). Topic, focus, and the grammar of spoken French, Benjamins Amsterdam

Lambrecht, K. (1987). Presentational cleft constructions in spoken French. Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 135, 179.

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents (Vol. 71): Cambridge university press.

Lambrecht, K. (1996). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents (Vol. 71): Cambridge university press.

Lambrecht, K. (2001). A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics, 39(3), 463-516.

Mathesius, V. (1882). O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových. nákl. Královské České Společnosti Náuk.

Mathesius, V. (1945). Řeč a sloh [Speech and style]. Čtení o jazyce a poesii. Praha: Družstevní práce v Praze, 13-102.

Modaresi, B. (2007). Information Structure and its Representation in Persian. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation. University of Tarbiyat Modares.

Rasekhi, V. (2018). Ellipsis and information structure: Evidence from Persian. State University of New York at Stony Brook.

Rezai, V., & Hooshmand, M. (2012). Focus Structure in Persian Interrogative Sentences: An RRG Analysis. English Language Teaching, 5(8), 130-145.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar (pp. 281-337): Springer.

Roberts, C. (2012). Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, 6-1-69.

Samko, B. (2016). Syntax & information structure: The grammar of English inversions. UC Santa Cruz.

Shafiei, S. (2014). Postposing and Information Structure in English and Farsi/Persian. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 1(11), 48-55.

Sousa, V. D., Driessnack, M., & Mendes, I. A. C. (2007). An overview of research designs relevant to nursing: Part 1: quantitative research designs. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 15(3), 502-507.

Vallduví Botet, E., & Engdahl, E. (1996). The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics. 1996; 34 (3): 459-519. DOI: 10.1515/ling. 1996.34. 3.459.

Vallduví, E. (1992). The information component. University of Pennsylvania. PhD Dissertation dissertation,

Van Valin Jr, R. D. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface: Cambridge University Press.

Von der Gabelentz, H. C., & Loebe, J. (1843). Ulfilas: Veteris et Novi Testamenti versionis gothicae fragmenta quae supersunt ad fidem codd. castigata, latinitate donata, adnotatione critica instructa, cum glossario et grammatica linguae gothicae coniunctis curis (Vol. 2): apud FA Brockhaus.