Psycho-dynamics of EFL Learners’ Writing Skills Development: Do Dynamic Assessment Modalities Matter?
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمهSeyed Hamed Etemadi 1 , Gholam-Reza Abbasian 2 , Abdollah Baradaran 3
1 - Department of Foreign Languages, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English, Imam Ali University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Foreign Languages, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Dynamic Assessment, writing skills, intervention, Psycho-dynamics,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study tries to explore psycho-dynamics of Iranian EFL learners under the functions of dynamic assessment intervention modalities (i.e., facilitative vs. authoritative) modalities in developing their writing skills. To this end, this qualitative study ran on the basis of semi-structured interviews and written protocols data collected from 120 Iranian advanced EFL learners was designed to elicit an in-depth understanding of the participants’ thoughts during performing writing tasks. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data from both sources (i.e., interviews and written protocols) revealed that: 1) authoritative modality works more effectively in facilitating the processes of opinion expression and effective revision and correction, 2) facilitative modality contributes more to developing critical and reflective thinking processes while writing. In the light of the facilitative modality, the learners can easily switch from their individualistic focus to a collaborative culture among teachers and learners. So, the learners become more self-regulated and can move from object-regulation through other-regulation towards self-regulation. Then, EFL learners’ psycho-dynamic actions are a function of DA-modalities. The findings offer theoretical and pedagogical insights for both researchers and practitioners in addressing language learning and learners.
مطالعه حاضر تلاش می کند تا روان پویایی زبان آموزان ایرانی زبان انگلیسی را در قالب روش های مداخله ارزیابی پویا (یعنی تسهیل کننده در مقابل آمرانه) درپیشرفت مهارت های نوشتاری خود بررسی کند. برای این منظور، این مطالعه کیفی بر اساس مصاحبه های نیمه ساختار یافته و داده های پروتکل های مکتوب جمع آوری شده از 120 زبان آموز پیشرفته ایرانی طراحی شد تا درک عمیقی از افکار شرکت کنندگان در حین انجام کارهای نوشتاری ایجاد کند. تجزیه و تحلیل موضوعی داده های کیفی از هر دو منبع ( مصاحبه ها و پروتکل های مکتوب) نشان داد که: 1) روش آمرانه در تسهیل فرایند بیان نظرات و بازنگری و تصحیح موثرتر عمل می کند ، 2) شیوه تسهیل کننده بیشتر درپیشرفت انتقادی و فرآیند تفکر بازتابی هنگام نوشتن ایفای نقش میکند و در پرتو شیوه تسهیل گر ، یادگیرندگان می توانند به راحتی از تمرکز فردگرایانه خود به فرهنگ مشارکتی بین معلمان و زبان آموزان تغییر وضعیت دهند. بنابراین ، یادگیرندگان به سمت خودتنظیمی حرکت کنند.
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing, Oxford university press.
Barzegar, R. and R. Azarizad (2013). Using dynamic assessment to improve L2 learners’ knowledge of grammar: Evidence from the tenses. Class-room-oriented Research: Achievements and Challenges, Springer: 219-227.
Besharati, F. (2018). "An Interactionist Dynamic Assessment of essay writing via Google Docs: A case of three Iranian EFL university students." Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 96-114.
Black, P. and D. Wiliam (1998). "Assessment and classroom learning." Assessment in Education: Principles, policy & practice 5(1): 7-74.
Ferris, D. R. and J. Hedgcock (2013). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice, Routledge.
French, J. N. and C. Rhoder (1992). Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice, Taylor & Francis.
Gibbons, P. (2003). "Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content‐based classroom." TESOL Quarterly 37(2): 247-273
Guba, E. G. and Y. S. Lincoln (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches, Jossey-Bass.
Guo, Z., et al. (2009). "A novel androgen receptor splice variant is up-regulated during prostate cancer progression and promotes androgen depletion–resistant growth." Cancer research 69(6): 2305-2313.
Han, P., et al. (2007). "Dopaminergic modulation of spinal neuronal excitability." Journal of Neuroscience 27(48): 13192-13204.
Hassaskhah, J. and M. J. Haghparast (2012). "A comparative study of the impact of DA models on the writing ability and attitude of Iranian EFL learners." The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics 5: 38-51.
Hidri, S. (2019). "Static vs. dynamic assessment of students’ writing exams: a comparison of two assessment modes." International Multilingual Research Journal 13(4): 239-256.
Khwaileh, F. M. (1991). A Comparative Study of the Effect of Some Selected Prewriting Activities on the Quantity and Quality of Paragraphs Written Byninth Grade Students in Ramtha, Yarmouk University.
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). "Second language learning as a mediated process." Language teaching, 33(2): 79-96.
Lantolf, J. P. and M. E. Poehner (2004). "Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future." Journal of applied linguistics 1(1).
Lidz, C. S. (2002). "Mediated learning experience (MLE) as a basis for an alternative approach to assessment." School Psychology International 23(1): 68-84.
Malmeer, E. and M. Zoghi (2014). "Dynamic Assessment of Grammar with Differ-ent Age Groups." Theory & Practice in Language Studies 4(8).
Mendonsa, N. S., et al. (2018). "Develop-ment of poloxamer gel formulations via hot-melt extrusion technology." International journal of Pharmaceutics 537(1-2): 122-131.
Miao, T. and L. Mian (2013). Dynamic assessment in ESL writing classroom. 2013 Conference on Education Tech-
208 Psycho-dynamics of EFL Learners’ Writing Skills Development: …
nology and Management Science (ICETMS 2013), Atlantis Press.
Nassaji, H. and M. Swain (2000). "A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles." Language awareness 9(1): 34-51.
Negari, G. M. and O. T. Rezaabadi (2012). "Too nervous to write? The relationship between anxiety and EFL writing." Theory and practice in language studies 2(12): 2578-2586.
Negueruela, E. and J. P. Lantolf (2006). "Con-cept-based instruction and the acquisition of L2 Spanish." The art of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis: 79-102.
Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development, Springer Science & Business Media.
Rahimi, M., et al. (2015). "Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing." Language and sociocultural theory 2(2): 185-208.
Richards, J. C. (2008). "Second language teacher education today." RELC journal 39(2): 158-177.
Rieber, R. W. and J. Wollock (1997). "The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation." The Collected Works of LS Vygotsky: Problems of the Theory and History of Psychology: 233-343.
Safa, M. A. and F. Jafari (2017). "The washback effect of dynamic assessment on grammar learning of Iranian EFL learners." The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching 7(1): 55-68.
Safdari, M. and J. Fathi (2020). "Investigating the role of dynamic assessment on speaking accuracy and fluency of pre-intermediate EFL learners." Cogent Education 7(1): 1818924.
Saxena, P., et al. (2018). "Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial." Endoscopy 50(05): 497-504.
Shabani, K. (2018). "Group dynamic assessment of L2 learners' writing abilities." Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 6(1): 129-149.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). "Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects." Education for information 22(2): 63-75.
Shrestha, P. (2013). "Dynamic assessment and academic writing: Evidence of learning transfer?".
Shrestha, P. and C. Coffin (2012). "Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development." As-sessing writing 17(1): 55-70.
Thorndike, E. L. (1913). An introduction to the theory of mental and social measurements, Teacher's College, Columbia University.
Yaghchi, M. A., et al. (2016). "The effects of authoritative vs. facilitative interventions on EFL learnersʼ willingness to communicate." Journal of Instruction and Evaluation 9(35): 177-194.
