The Function of Metaphorical Language in Shaping Political Texts Based on Kövecses’ Framework: A CDA Perspective
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمه
Somayeh Jafarnezhad
1
(
English Language Department, Sarab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran
)
Bahloul Salmani
2
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
Hossein Sadegh Oghli
3
(
English Language Department, Sarab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarab, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), conceptual metaphor, source domains, political articles, critical metaphor analysis (CMA),
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed to examine the role of figurative language in shaping political texts based on the modern framework suggested by Kövecses. The research corpus comprised thirty thousand words selected as a text sample to see the source of the conceptual domain used. It was prepared through a systematic random sampling of various editorial articles in Western political journals on the relationship between Iran and the West in the period 2010-2019. Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) was used to specify patterns in political articles, usually providing support for previous research by authority figures in critical and political metaphor analysis that metaphors are used to shape political thought, aid political persuasion, and in directing circumstances and cognitive models to form the interpretation of the nation as a person or body metaphor. Finally, the study provides substantial support for the textual findings of conceptual metaphors used. The findings of the study provide EFL classrooms with a number of implications for future research.
این مطالعه با هدف بررسی نقش زبان مجازی در شکل‌دهی متون سیاسی بر اساس چارچوب مدرن پیشنهادی کووکسس انجام شد. مجموعه پژوهش شامل 30 هزار کلمه است که به عنوان نمونه متن انتخاب شده تا منبع حوزه مفهومی مورد استفاده را مشاهده کند. این مقاله از طریق نمونه‌گیری تصادفی سیستماتیک از مقالات مختلف سرمقاله مجلات سیاسی غرب در رابطه با روابط ایران و غرب در دوره زمانی 2019-2010 تهیه شده است. تحلیل استعاره انتقادی (CMA) برای مشخص کردن الگوها در مقالات سیاسی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت، که معمولاً از تحقیقات قبلی توسط شخصیت‌های معتبر در تحلیل استعاره‌ای انتقادی و سیاسی پشتیبانی می‌کرد که استعاره‌ها برای شکل‌دهی به تفکر سیاسی، کمک به اقناع سیاسی، و در جهت دادن به شرایط و مدل‌های شناختی استفاده می‌شوند. برای شکل دادن به تعبیر ملت به عنوان یک شخص یا استعاره بدن. در نهایت، این مطالعه از یافته‌های متنی استعاره‌های مفهومی مورد استفاده پشتیبانی می‌کند. یافته‌های این مطالعه، مفاهیم متعددی را برای تحقیقات آینده در اختیار کلاس‌های درس زبان انگلیسی قرار می‌دهد.
Arcimavičienė L. (2014), Presidential New Year greetings: What is implied by metaphors? Studies about languages. 24, 76-86.
Bednarek, M. (2005). Construing the world: Conceptual metaphors and event- construal in news stories. Metaphorik. De, 9, 6–32.
Bednarek, M. (2006a). Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text & Talk, 26(6), 635–60.
Bednarek, M. (2006b). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. A&C Black.
Beer, F. A., & Landtsheer, C. D. (2004). Metaphors, politics, and world politics. In F. A. Beer, & C. De Landtsheer (Eds.).
Journal of Language and Translation, Volume 13, Number 2, 2023 223
Metaphorical World Politics (pp. 5-55). Michigan State University Press.
Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
Cammaerts, B. (2012). The strategic use of metaphors by political and media elites: the 2007- 11 Belgian constitutional crisis. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 8 (2/3), 229-249.
Cap, P. (2006). Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in De-bates About Europe: by Andreas Musolff, Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, 2004, viii+ 211 pp., hb.
Charteris-Black, J. (2006a). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Charteris-Black, J. (2007). The Communication of leadership: The design of leadership style. London and New York: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, J. (2006b). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563-581.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Metaphor in political discourse. In Politicians and rhetoric (pp. 28- 51). Palgrave Macmillan, Lon-don.
Chiappe, D. L. (2000). Metaphor, modularity, and the evolution of conceptual integration. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3), 137-158.
Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (2005). Foreign policy by metaphor. In Language & Peace (pp. 61- 84). Routledge.
Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (1997). Discourse and politics. Discourse as social interaction, 2, 206-230.
Carston, R. (2002). Metaphor, ad hoc concepts and word meaning–more questions than answers. University College London, 83-105.
Crisp, P., Heywood, J., & Steen, G. (2002). Metaphor identification and analysis, classification and quantification. Language and literature, 11(1), 55-69.
Eubanks, P. (2000). A war of words in the discourse of trade: The rhetorical constitution of metaphor. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Farahani, A., & Adeli Jam, Z. (2019). The role of metaphorical language in the critical discourse analysis of Western political texts. Journal of Language and Translation, 9(1), 17-31.
Gibbs Jr, R. W., & Tendahl, M. (2006). Cogni-tive effort and effects in metaphor com-prehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind & Language, 21(3), 379-403.
Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: Meta-phor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. Metaphor in cog-nitive linguistics, 79-100.
Guttenplan, S. (2006). The transparency of metaphor. Mind & language, 21(3), 333-359.
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hellsten, I. (2002). The politics of metaphor: biotechnology and biodiversity in the media. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Heywood, J., Semino, E., & Short, M. (2002). Linguistic metaphor identification in two extracts from novels. Language and Literature, 11(1), 35-54.
Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2009). Metaphor, culture, and discourse: The pressures of coherence. In A. Musolff, & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 11–24). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
224 The Function of Metaphorical Language in Shaping Political …
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: the reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). How metaphor structures dreams: The theory of conceptual metaphor applied to dream analysis. Dreaming, 3(2), 77.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The meta-phorical structure of the human concep-tual system. Cognitive science, 4(2), 195-208.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. Leezenberg, M. (2001). Aristotle on Metaphor, Comparison and Similarity. Contexts of Metaphor. Amsterdam, New York: Elsevier, 31-42.
Levin, S. (1977). The Semantics of Metaphor. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins. LevinThe Semantics of Metaphor1977.
Low, G. (1988). On teaching metaphor. Applied Linguistics, 9 (2), 125-47.
McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. A. (2001). Topic—vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1209-1219.
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23– 38.
Musolff, A. (2010). Metaphor, nation and the holocaust: The concept of the body politics (Vol. 3). Routledge.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. John Benjamins. Musolff, A., & Zinken, J. (eds.) (2009). Metaphor and discourse. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Osgerby, J., Marriott, P., & Gee, M. (2018). Accounting students perceptions of using visual metaphor as part of personal development planning: an exploratory case study. Accounting Education, 27(6), 570-589.
Pinker, S. (1994). How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics? Lingua, 92, 377- 410.
Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. Metaphor and thought, 2, 137-163.
Shimko, K.L. (2004). The power of metaphors and the metaphors of power: The United States in the cold war and after. In F. A. Beer, & C. De Landtsheer (Eds.). Metaphorical world politics (pp. 199–215). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
Steen, G. J., & Gibbs Jr, R. W. (1999). Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, 1-233.
Stern, J. (2000). Metaphor in context. MIT Press.
Thompson, S. (1996). Politics without metaphors is like a fish without water. In J. Scott Mio, & A. N., Katz (Eds.). Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 185-201). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zinken, J. (2007). Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies.
Zinken, J., & Musolff, A. (2009). A discourse-centered perspective on metaphorical meaning and understanding. In Metaphor and discourse (pp. 1-8). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
