Relationship between EFL Teachers’ Efficacy and Productivity
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمهآزاده قربان زاده 1 , Seyyed Hassan Seyyedrezaei 2 , Behzad Ghonsooly 3 , Zari Sadat Seyyedrezaei 4
1 - گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه آزاد علی آباد کتول
2 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
3 - English Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
4 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
کلید واژه: adolescent students, English as Foreign Language (EFL) Teachers, Quality Education, Teachers’ Efficacy, Teachers’ Productivity,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study investigated the association between teachers’ efficacy and productivity among EFL teachers of adolescent students. On this premise, eighty high school English teachers from 34 public high schools in Mashhad were selected out of 100 English teachers through convenience sampling. Data were collected via two instruments, the Teachers’ Efficacy Questionnaire (Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk, 2001), and the Teachers’ productivity Questionnaire (Hersey & Goldsmith, 1980). Subsequently, the data analyzed through the Pearson correlation and regression toward the mean analysis. The results of the correlation tests uncovered that there was a critical connection between EFL teachers’ efficacy and productivity. Furthermore, the results of simple regression analyses confirmed that teachers’ efficacy was a noteworthy predictor of their productivity. Thusly, in light of the results of assessing teachers’ perception, policymakers and professionals might have the option to cultivate teachers’ competency by planning and determining their future professional paths and provide a clearer perspective for their professional growth and development.
پژوهش حاضر به بررسی رابطه بین اثربخشی و بهره‌وری معلمان در بین معلمان زبان انگلیسی دانش‌آموزان نوجوان پرداخته است. در این فرض، هشتاد معلم انگلیسی دبیرستان از 34 دبیرستان دولتی شهر مشهد از بین 100 معلم انگلیسی به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. داده ها از طریق دو ابزار، پرسشنامه کارآمدی معلمان (Tschannen-Moran & Woolfolk، 2001) و پرسشنامه بهره وری معلمان (Hersy & Goldsmith، 1980) جمع آوری شد. سپس داده ها با استفاده از همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون به سمت میانگین مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج آزمون‌های همبستگی ارتباط مهمی را بین اثربخشی و بهره‌وری معلمان زبان انگلیسی نشان داد. علاوه بر این، تحلیل‌های رگرسیون ساده تأیید کرد که کارآمدی معلمان پیش‌بینی‌کننده قابل توجهی برای بهره‌وری آنها بود. در پرتو نتایج ارزیابی ادراک معلمان، سیاستگذاران و متخصصان ممکن است این گزینه را داشته باشند که شایستگی معلمان را با برنامه ریزی و تعیین مسیرهای حرفه ای آینده آنها و ارائه چشم اندازی روشن تر برای رشد و توسعه حرفه ای آنها پرورش دهند.
Adu, E. O. (2015). Institutional, personal, and reward system factors as determinants of teachers’ productivity in public secondary schools in Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences (JSS), 45(1), 1-7.
Adu, F., Oshati, T., & Eze, I. (2012). Career advancement, school relation and support factors as determinants of teachers’ productivity in public schools in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education, 4(4), 27-28.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337).
Bharti, D. (2017). Adolescence education programme: Impact on the awareness level of secondary school students. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(7), 248-258.
Bozonelos, J. (2008). Retention in Special Education: Reducing Attrition through Supportive Administrative Interventi ons. International Journal of Learning, 15, 149-157.
Cloud, N., Lakin, J., Leininger, E., & Laura, M. (2010). Teaching adolescent English language learners: Essential strategies for middle and high school. Caslon Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4 ed.). Pearson.
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636-650.
Dibapile, W. T. S. (2012). A review of literature on teacher efficacy and classroom management. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 9(2), 79-92.
Emunemu, B., Oshati, T., & Adu, E. O. (2010). Quality of work life as determinants of teacher productivity in secondary schools in Oyo state, Nigeria. West African Journal of Management and Liberal Studies, 4(1), 131-144.
Ghonsooly, B., Khajavy, G. H., & Mahjoobi, F. M. (2014). Self-efficacy and metacognition as predictors of Iranian teacher trainees’ academic performance: A path analysis approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 590-598.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2016). Managing human resources (8 ed.). Pearson
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63-69.
Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(3), 404-420.
Hersey, H., & Goldsmith, M. (1980). A situational approach to performance planning. Training and Development Journal, 34(11), 38-49.
Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. (2003). Pursuing a “Sense of Success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581-617.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Lesiak, K. (2015). Teaching English to adolescents. World Scientific News, 1, 246-260.
Ozturk, I. (2001). The role of education in economic development: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Rural Development and Administration, 33(1), 39-47.
Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved March 16, 2009 from http://www. emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html
Parker, A. K. (2013). Understanding and supporting young adolescents during the transition into middle school. In P. G. Andrews (Ed.), Research to guide practice in middle grades education (pp. 495-510). Association for Middle Level Education.
Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of a randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50-60.
Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job stress and burnout: A mediation analysis. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 152-171.
Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1997). Efficacy and experience: Perceptions of efficacy among pre-service and practicing teachers. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(4), 214-221.
Taylor, F. W. (1997). The principles of scientific management. Dover Publications.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
Vera-Estay, E., Dooley, J. J., & Beauchamp, M. H. (2014). Cognitive underpinnings of moral reasoning in adolescence: The contribution of executive functions. Journal of Moral Education, 44(1), 17-33.
Williams, R. (2009). Gaining a degree: The effect on teacher self-efficacy and emotions. Professional Development in Education, 35(4), 601-612.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 407-415.
Woolfolk, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81-91.
Yusuf, M. A., & Adigun, J. T. (2010). The influence of school climate change on teachers’ productivity and students’ achievement. Journal of Research in National Development, 8(2), 32-45.
